TSTP Solution File: SWW862+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW862+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 287.67s 287.85s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW862+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 12:22:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.38 Sat Jun 4 12:22:10 2022
% 0.21/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21506.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=6.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.21/0.38 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.21/0.38 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.21/0.38 22 back subsumes 20.
% 0.21/0.38 22 back subsumes 19.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,1] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.21/0.38 56 back subsumes 6.
% 0.21/0.38 56 back subsumes 5.
% 0.21/0.38 61 back subsumes 54.
% 0.21/0.38 61 back subsumes 23.
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 71 during input processing: 0 [copy,62,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,B).
% 0.21/0.38 62 back subsumes 53.
% 0.21/0.38 62 back subsumes 7.
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 71 during input processing: 0 [copy,71,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.38 71 back subsumes 62.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 41
% 0.21/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 54
% 0.21/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.21/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.21/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 96
% 0.21/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 55
% 0.21/0.46 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.21/0.46 distinct function count: 39
% 0.21/0.46 distinct constant count: 14
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Changing weight limit from 60 to 96.
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Resetting weight limit to 96 after 5 givens.
% 0.21/0.46
% 73.54/73.75
% 73.54/73.75
% 73.54/73.75 Changing weight limit from 96 to 81.
% 73.54/73.75
% 73.54/73.75 Resetting weight limit to 81 after 80 givens.
% 73.54/73.75
% 100.86/101.07
% 100.86/101.07
% 100.86/101.07 Changing weight limit from 81 to 77.
% 100.86/101.07
% 100.86/101.07 Resetting weight limit to 77 after 85 givens.
% 100.86/101.07
% 173.91/174.13
% 173.91/174.13
% 173.91/174.13 Changing weight limit from 77 to 68.
% 173.91/174.13
% 173.91/174.13 Resetting weight limit to 68 after 90 givens.
% 173.91/174.13
% 243.40/243.56
% 243.40/243.56
% 243.40/243.56 Changing weight limit from 68 to 64.
% 243.40/243.56
% 243.40/243.56 Resetting weight limit to 64 after 95 givens.
% 243.40/243.56
% 268.16/268.35
% 268.16/268.35
% 268.16/268.35 Changing weight limit from 64 to 62.
% 268.16/268.35
% 268.16/268.35 Resetting weight limit to 62 after 100 givens.
% 268.16/268.35
% 287.67/287.85
% 287.67/287.85
% 287.67/287.85 Changing weight limit from 62 to 59.
% 287.67/287.85
% 287.67/287.85 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 105 givens.
% 287.67/287.85
% 300.08/300.25 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------