TSTP Solution File: SWW861+1 by Nitpick---2016

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SWW861+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n191.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.5MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 15:18:54 EST 2019

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 59.89s
% Output   : FiniteModel 59.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWW861+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.04/0.26  % Computer : n191.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.04/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.04/0.26  % Memory   : 32218.5MB
% 0.04/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.04/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.26  % DateTime : Mon Feb 25 18:28:14 CST 2019
% 0.04/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 15.32/4.73  Building HOL-TPTP ...
% 45.10/24.18  Finished HOL-TPTP (0:00:16 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.71)
% 45.15/24.27  0:00:22 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.21
% 59.89/39.39  Nitpicking formula...
% 59.89/39.39  Timestamp: 18:28:49
% 59.89/39.39  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 59.89/39.39  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 59.89/39.39  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 59.89/39.39    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 59.89/39.39    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 59.89/39.39    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 59.89/39.39    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 59.89/39.39    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 59.89/39.39  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 59.89/39.39  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 59.89/39.39  
% 59.89/39.39    Skolem constants:
% 59.89/39.39      V_27A_27 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      V_27B_27 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      V_27C_27 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      V_27D_27 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      V_27f_27 = i2
% 59.89/39.39    Constants:
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_cF__00 = i2
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_cT__00 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2elist_2eMAP_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2elist_2eNIL_27__00 = i2
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2enamespace_2eBind_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2enamespace_2ensEmpty_27__00 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2enamespace_2ensMap_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2epair_2eUNCURRY_27__01 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27type_2enamespace_2enamespace_27__03 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1)))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_cbool__00 = i1
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_cfun__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_chapp__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_p__01 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 59.89/39.39      bnd_s__02 =
% 59.89/39.39        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 59.89/39.39        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1),
% 59.89/39.39         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1))
% 59.89/39.39  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 59.89/39.39  Total time: 3.4 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------