TSTP Solution File: SWW824_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW824_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:18:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 1.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SWW824_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 04:17:09 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.41 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.17/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.38/1.07 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/1.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 ------ iProver source info
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 0.38/1.07 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 0.38/1.07 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 ------ Parsing...
% 0.38/1.07 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f3,axiom,(
% 0.38/1.07 f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = 0.0),
% 0.38/1.07 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',formula_3)).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f4,axiom,(
% 0.38/1.07 ? [X0 : $real] : ((~$less(X0,0.0) => 1.0 = X0) & ($less(X0,0.0) => $uminus(X0) = 1.0) & f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = X0)),
% 0.38/1.07 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',formula_4)).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f803,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 ? [X0 : $real] : ((1.0 = X0 | $less(X0,0.0)) & ($uminus(X0) = 1.0 | ~$less(X0,0.0)) & f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = X0)),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f912,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 ? [X0 : $real] : ((1.0 = X0 | $less(X0,0.0)) & ($uminus(X0) = 1.0 | ~$less(X0,0.0)) & f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = X0) => ((1.0 = sK0 | $less(sK0,0.0)) & (1.0 = $uminus(sK0) | ~$less(sK0,0.0)) & f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = sK0)),
% 0.38/1.07 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f913,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 (1.0 = sK0 | $less(sK0,0.0)) & (1.0 = $uminus(sK0) | ~$less(sK0,0.0)) & f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = sK0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f803,f912])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f1364,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = 0.0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f1365,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = sK0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f913])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 tff(f1367,plain,(
% 0.38/1.07 1.0 = sK0 | $less(sK0,0.0)),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f913])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_85,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product_real(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = 0.0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1364])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_86,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (sK0 = 1.0|$less_real(sK0,0.0)),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1367])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_88,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (f3(f4,f3(f5(f6,$product_real(2.0,f7)),f8(f9,f10))) = sK0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1365])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_1007,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 ($less_real(sK0,0.0)|sK0 = 1.0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_86])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_1008,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (sK0 = 1.0|$less_real(sK0,0.0)),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_1007])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_3342,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (sK0 = 0.0),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_85])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_3344,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 (0.0 = 1.0|$less_real(0.0,0.0)),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1008,c_3342])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 cnf(c_3345,plain,
% 0.38/1.07 ($false),
% 0.38/1.07 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3344])).
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/1.07
% 0.38/1.07
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------