TSTP Solution File: SWW816_1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWW816_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:51:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 21.80s 3.68s
% Output : Proof 25.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWW816_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 20:51:03 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.63 ________ _____
% 0.21/0.63 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.63 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.21/0.63 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.21/0.63 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.63 (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.63 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.63 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.63 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.64 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.75/0.95 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.95 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.95 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.95 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.95 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.96 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.75/0.96 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 7.64/1.78 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.79 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.79 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.79 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.80 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.80 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 7.96/1.81 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 21.80/3.64 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.80/3.65 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.80/3.68 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.80/3.68 Prover 0: proved (3023ms)
% 21.80/3.68
% 21.80/3.68 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.80/3.68
% 21.80/3.68 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 21.80/3.70 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 22.51/3.75 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.51/3.76 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.51/3.77 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1)
% 22.51/3.77 Prover 4: proved (3116ms)
% 22.51/3.77 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 22.51/3.77 Prover 6: stopped
% 22.51/3.78 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 22.97/3.80 Prover 1: stopped
% 22.97/3.80 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.97/3.81 Prover 3: stopped
% 23.79/3.93 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 24.66/4.04 Prover 7: stopped
% 25.01/4.13 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 25.01/4.13 Prover 5: stopped
% 25.79/4.29 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 25.79/4.29 Prover 2: stopped
% 25.79/4.29
% 25.79/4.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 25.79/4.29
% 25.79/4.29 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 25.79/4.30 Assumptions after simplification:
% 25.79/4.30 ---------------------------------
% 25.79/4.30
% 25.79/4.30 (formula_101)
% 25.79/4.30 $false
% 25.79/4.30
% 25.79/4.30 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 25.79/4.30 --------------------------------------------
% 25.79/4.30 formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95,
% 25.79/4.30 formula_96, formula_97, formula_98, formula_99
% 25.79/4.30
% 25.79/4.30 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 25.79/4.30 ---------------------------------
% 25.79/4.30
% 25.79/4.30 Begin of proof
% 25.79/4.30 |
% 25.79/4.30 | CLOSE: (formula_101) is inconsistent.
% 25.79/4.30 |
% 25.79/4.30 End of proof
% 25.79/4.31 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 25.79/4.31
% 25.79/4.31 3675ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------