TSTP Solution File: SWW815_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW815_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:51:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 32.81s 5.47s
% Output   : Proof 47.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.18  % Problem  : SWW815_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.15/0.19  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.15/0.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 21:07:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 1.52/0.95  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.52/0.95  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.52/0.96  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.52/0.96  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.52/0.96  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.52/0.96  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.83/0.97  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 9.71/2.10  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.10  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.10  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.11  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.11  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.11  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 9.71/2.13  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 27.32/4.71  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 27.32/4.74  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 29.12/4.77  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 29.68/4.83  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.68/4.85  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.68/4.86  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.36/5.06  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 31.36/5.07  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 32.81/5.45  Prover 0: proved (4829ms)
% 32.81/5.46  
% 32.81/5.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 32.81/5.47  
% 32.81/5.47  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 32.81/5.49  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 33.40/5.49  Prover 3: stopped
% 33.40/5.50  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 33.40/5.51  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 33.40/5.51  Prover 6: stopped
% 33.40/5.52  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 33.40/5.52  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 37.34/5.91  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 37.34/5.91  Prover 5: stopped
% 37.34/5.91  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 37.75/5.93  Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 38.00/6.27  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 39.03/6.28  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 41.02/6.41  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 42.05/6.52  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 42.86/6.68  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 42.86/6.68  Prover 2: stopped
% 43.35/6.73  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 43.35/6.74  Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 43.35/6.75  Prover 4: Found proof (size 15)
% 43.35/6.76  Prover 4: proved (6133ms)
% 43.35/6.76  Prover 1: stopped
% 43.35/6.76  Prover 10: stopped
% 43.95/6.76  Prover 11: stopped
% 45.13/7.00  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 45.97/7.11  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 45.97/7.12  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 46.39/7.18  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 46.39/7.19  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 46.39/7.20  Prover 8: stopped
% 46.74/7.23  Prover 7: stopped
% 46.94/7.29  Prover 13: stopped
% 46.94/7.29  
% 46.94/7.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 46.94/7.29  
% 46.94/7.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 46.94/7.31  Assumptions after simplification:
% 46.94/7.31  ---------------------------------
% 46.94/7.31  
% 46.94/7.31    (formula_101)
% 47.33/7.35    c_type(type_global) & c_type(c_int) & c_type(type_alloc_table) &  ? [v0:
% 47.33/7.35      c_type] :  ? [v1: c_type] :  ? [v2: c_unique] :  ? [v3: c_unique] :  ? [v4:
% 47.33/7.35      c_ssorted] :  ? [v5: c_ssorted] :  ? [v6: c_unique] :  ? [v7: c_ssorted] : 
% 47.33/7.35    ? [v8: int] :  ? [v9: int] :  ? [v10: int] :  ? [v11: c_unique] :  ? [v12:
% 47.33/7.35      c_ssorted] :  ? [v13: c_unique] : ($lesseq(v9, v8) & $lesseq(1, v9) &
% 47.33/7.35      $lesseq(v8, 2800) & %(v8, 14) = 0 & type_memory(c_int, type_global) = v1 &
% 47.33/7.35      valid_range(v4, v5, 0, 2800) = 0 & type_pointer(type_global) = v0 &
% 47.33/7.36      c_sort(v1, v11) = v12 & c_sort(v1, v6) = v7 & c_sort(v0, v3) = v5 &
% 47.33/7.36      c_sort(type_alloc_table, v2) = v4 & c_unique(v13) & c_unique(v11) &
% 47.33/7.36      c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v3) & c_unique(v2) & c_type(v1) & c_type(v0) &
% 47.33/7.36      c_ssorted(v12) & c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v5) & c_ssorted(v4) &  ! [v14:
% 47.33/7.36        c_ssorted] : ( ~ (c_sort(v0, v13) = v14) |  ? [v15: c_unique] :  ? [v16:
% 47.33/7.36          c_ssorted] :  ? [v17: int] :  ? [v18: int] :  ? [v19: int] :  ? [v20:
% 47.33/7.36          c_unique] :  ? [v21: c_ssorted] :  ? [v22: c_unique] :  ? [v23: int] : 
% 47.33/7.36        ? [v24: int] : (v9 = 1 & $lesseq(v8, 13) & whydivide(v19, 10000) = v23 &
% 47.33/7.36          whydivide($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v19 & %(v19, 10000) =
% 47.33/7.36          v24 & %($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v18 & upd(v12, v14, v21) =
% 47.33/7.36          v22 & acc(v12, v14) = v15 & shift(v5, 1) = v13 & valid(v4, v14) = 0 &
% 47.33/7.36          int2U(v18) = v20 & ss2Int(v16) = v17 & c_sort(c_int, v20) = v21 &
% 47.33/7.36          c_sort(c_int, v15) = v16 & c_unique(v22) & c_unique(v20) & c_unique(v15)
% 47.33/7.36          & c_ssorted(v21) & c_ssorted(v16))) &  ? [v14: c_ssorted] :  ? [v15:
% 47.33/7.36        c_unique] :  ? [v16: c_ssorted] :  ? [v17: int] :  ? [v18: int] :  ? [v19:
% 47.33/7.36        int] :  ? [v20: c_unique] :  ? [v21: c_ssorted] :  ? [v22: c_unique] :  ?
% 47.33/7.36      [v23: int] :  ? [v24: int] : (v9 = 1 & $lesseq(v8, 13) & whydivide(v19,
% 47.33/7.36          10000) = v23 & whydivide($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v19 &
% 47.33/7.36        %(v19, 10000) = v24 & %($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v18 &
% 47.33/7.36        upd(v12, v14, v21) = v22 & acc(v12, v14) = v15 & shift(v5, 1) = v13 &
% 47.33/7.36        valid(v4, v14) = 0 & int2U(v18) = v20 & ss2Int(v16) = v17 & c_sort(v0,
% 47.33/7.36          v13) = v14 & c_sort(c_int, v20) = v21 & c_sort(c_int, v15) = v16 &
% 47.33/7.36        c_unique(v22) & c_unique(v20) & c_unique(v15) & c_ssorted(v21) &
% 47.33/7.36        c_ssorted(v16) & c_ssorted(v14)) &  ? [v14: int] :  ? [v15: c_unique] :  ?
% 47.33/7.36      [v16: c_ssorted] :  ? [v17: c_unique] :  ? [v18: c_ssorted] :  ? [v19: int]
% 47.33/7.36      : (acc(v7, v16) = v17 & shift(v5, v14) = v15 & ss2Int(v18) = v19 &
% 47.33/7.36        c_sort(v0, v15) = v16 & c_sort(c_int, v17) = v18 & c_unique(v17) &
% 47.33/7.36        c_unique(v15) & c_ssorted(v18) & c_ssorted(v16) & (v19 = 2000 |  ~
% 47.33/7.36          ($lesseq(v14, 2799)) |  ~ ($lesseq(0, v14)))))
% 47.33/7.36  
% 47.33/7.36    (formula_99)
% 47.33/7.36     ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, 13)) |  ~ ($lesseq(1, v0)) |  ~ (%(v0, 14) =
% 47.33/7.36        0))
% 47.33/7.36  
% 47.33/7.36  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 47.33/7.36  --------------------------------------------
% 47.33/7.36  formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95,
% 47.33/7.36  formula_96, formula_97, formula_98
% 47.33/7.36  
% 47.33/7.36  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 47.33/7.36  ---------------------------------
% 47.33/7.36  
% 47.33/7.36  Begin of proof
% 47.33/7.37  | 
% 47.33/7.37  | ALPHA: (formula_101) implies:
% 47.54/7.38  |   (1)   ? [v0: c_type] :  ? [v1: c_type] :  ? [v2: c_unique] :  ? [v3:
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_unique] :  ? [v4: c_ssorted] :  ? [v5: c_ssorted] :  ? [v6:
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_unique] :  ? [v7: c_ssorted] :  ? [v8: int] :  ? [v9: int] :  ?
% 47.54/7.38  |        [v10: int] :  ? [v11: c_unique] :  ? [v12: c_ssorted] :  ? [v13:
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_unique] : ($lesseq(v9, v8) & $lesseq(1, v9) & $lesseq(v8, 2800) &
% 47.54/7.38  |          %(v8, 14) = 0 & type_memory(c_int, type_global) = v1 &
% 47.54/7.38  |          valid_range(v4, v5, 0, 2800) = 0 & type_pointer(type_global) = v0 &
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_sort(v1, v11) = v12 & c_sort(v1, v6) = v7 & c_sort(v0, v3) = v5 &
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_sort(type_alloc_table, v2) = v4 & c_unique(v13) & c_unique(v11) &
% 47.54/7.38  |          c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v3) & c_unique(v2) & c_type(v1) & c_type(v0)
% 47.54/7.38  |          & c_ssorted(v12) & c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v5) & c_ssorted(v4) &  !
% 47.54/7.38  |          [v14: c_ssorted] : ( ~ (c_sort(v0, v13) = v14) |  ? [v15: c_unique] :
% 47.54/7.38  |             ? [v16: c_ssorted] :  ? [v17: int] :  ? [v18: int] :  ? [v19: int]
% 47.54/7.38  |            :  ? [v20: c_unique] :  ? [v21: c_ssorted] :  ? [v22: c_unique] : 
% 47.54/7.38  |            ? [v23: int] :  ? [v24: int] : (v9 = 1 & $lesseq(v8, 13) &
% 47.54/7.38  |              whydivide(v19, 10000) = v23 & whydivide($sum($product(10000,
% 47.54/7.38  |                    v17), v10), 1) = v19 & %(v19, 10000) = v24 &
% 47.54/7.38  |              %($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v18 & upd(v12, v14, v21)
% 47.54/7.38  |              = v22 & acc(v12, v14) = v15 & shift(v5, 1) = v13 & valid(v4, v14)
% 47.54/7.39  |              = 0 & int2U(v18) = v20 & ss2Int(v16) = v17 & c_sort(c_int, v20) =
% 47.54/7.39  |              v21 & c_sort(c_int, v15) = v16 & c_unique(v22) & c_unique(v20) &
% 47.54/7.39  |              c_unique(v15) & c_ssorted(v21) & c_ssorted(v16))) &  ? [v14:
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_ssorted] :  ? [v15: c_unique] :  ? [v16: c_ssorted] :  ? [v17:
% 47.54/7.39  |            int] :  ? [v18: int] :  ? [v19: int] :  ? [v20: c_unique] :  ?
% 47.54/7.39  |          [v21: c_ssorted] :  ? [v22: c_unique] :  ? [v23: int] :  ? [v24: int]
% 47.54/7.39  |          : (v9 = 1 & $lesseq(v8, 13) & whydivide(v19, 10000) = v23 &
% 47.54/7.39  |            whydivide($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v19 & %(v19, 10000)
% 47.54/7.39  |            = v24 & %($sum($product(10000, v17), v10), 1) = v18 & upd(v12, v14,
% 47.54/7.39  |              v21) = v22 & acc(v12, v14) = v15 & shift(v5, 1) = v13 & valid(v4,
% 47.54/7.39  |              v14) = 0 & int2U(v18) = v20 & ss2Int(v16) = v17 & c_sort(v0, v13)
% 47.54/7.39  |            = v14 & c_sort(c_int, v20) = v21 & c_sort(c_int, v15) = v16 &
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_unique(v22) & c_unique(v20) & c_unique(v15) & c_ssorted(v21) &
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_ssorted(v16) & c_ssorted(v14)) &  ? [v14: int] :  ? [v15:
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_unique] :  ? [v16: c_ssorted] :  ? [v17: c_unique] :  ? [v18:
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_ssorted] :  ? [v19: int] : (acc(v7, v16) = v17 & shift(v5, v14) =
% 47.54/7.39  |            v15 & ss2Int(v18) = v19 & c_sort(v0, v15) = v16 & c_sort(c_int,
% 47.54/7.39  |              v17) = v18 & c_unique(v17) & c_unique(v15) & c_ssorted(v18) &
% 47.54/7.39  |            c_ssorted(v16) & (v19 = 2000 |  ~ ($lesseq(v14, 2799)) |  ~
% 47.54/7.39  |              ($lesseq(0, v14)))))
% 47.54/7.39  | 
% 47.54/7.39  | DELTA: instantiating (1) with fresh symbols all_190_0, all_190_1, all_190_2,
% 47.54/7.39  |        all_190_3, all_190_4, all_190_5, all_190_6, all_190_7, all_190_8,
% 47.54/7.39  |        all_190_9, all_190_10, all_190_11, all_190_12, all_190_13 gives:
% 47.54/7.40  |   (2)  $lesseq(all_190_4, all_190_5) & $lesseq(1, all_190_4) &
% 47.54/7.40  |        $lesseq(all_190_5, 2800) & %(all_190_5, 14) = 0 & type_memory(c_int,
% 47.54/7.40  |          type_global) = all_190_12 & valid_range(all_190_9, all_190_8, 0,
% 47.54/7.40  |          2800) = 0 & type_pointer(type_global) = all_190_13 &
% 47.54/7.40  |        c_sort(all_190_12, all_190_2) = all_190_1 & c_sort(all_190_12,
% 47.54/7.40  |          all_190_7) = all_190_6 & c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_10) = all_190_8 &
% 47.54/7.40  |        c_sort(type_alloc_table, all_190_11) = all_190_9 & c_unique(all_190_0)
% 47.54/7.40  |        & c_unique(all_190_2) & c_unique(all_190_7) & c_unique(all_190_10) &
% 47.54/7.40  |        c_unique(all_190_11) & c_type(all_190_12) & c_type(all_190_13) &
% 47.54/7.40  |        c_ssorted(all_190_1) & c_ssorted(all_190_6) & c_ssorted(all_190_8) &
% 47.54/7.40  |        c_ssorted(all_190_9) &  ! [v0: c_ssorted] : ( ~ (c_sort(all_190_13,
% 47.54/7.40  |              all_190_0) = v0) |  ? [v1: c_unique] :  ? [v2: c_ssorted] :  ?
% 47.54/7.40  |          [v3: int] :  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: c_unique] :  ? [v7:
% 47.54/7.40  |            c_ssorted] :  ? [v8: c_unique] :  ? [v9: int] :  ? [v10: int] :
% 47.54/7.40  |          (all_190_4 = 1 & $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(v5, 10000) = v9 &
% 47.54/7.40  |            whydivide($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v5 & %(v5,
% 47.54/7.40  |              10000) = v10 & %($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v4 &
% 47.54/7.40  |            upd(all_190_1, v0, v7) = v8 & acc(all_190_1, v0) = v1 &
% 47.54/7.40  |            shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9, v0) = 0 &
% 47.54/7.40  |            int2U(v4) = v6 & ss2Int(v2) = v3 & c_sort(c_int, v6) = v7 &
% 47.54/7.40  |            c_sort(c_int, v1) = v2 & c_unique(v8) & c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v1)
% 47.54/7.40  |            & c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v2))) &  ? [v0: c_ssorted] :  ? [v1:
% 47.54/7.40  |          c_unique] :  ? [v2: c_ssorted] :  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4: int] :  ?
% 47.54/7.40  |        [v5: int] :  ? [v6: c_unique] :  ? [v7: c_ssorted] :  ? [v8: c_unique]
% 47.54/7.40  |        :  ? [v9: int] :  ? [v10: int] : (all_190_4 = 1 & $lesseq(all_190_5,
% 47.54/7.40  |            13) & whydivide(v5, 10000) = v9 & whydivide($sum($product(10000,
% 47.54/7.40  |                v3), all_190_3), 1) = v5 & %(v5, 10000) = v10 &
% 47.54/7.40  |          %($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v4 & upd(all_190_1, v0,
% 47.54/7.40  |            v7) = v8 & acc(all_190_1, v0) = v1 & shift(all_190_8, 1) =
% 47.54/7.40  |          all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9, v0) = 0 & int2U(v4) = v6 & ss2Int(v2) =
% 47.54/7.40  |          v3 & c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_0) = v0 & c_sort(c_int, v6) = v7 &
% 47.54/7.40  |          c_sort(c_int, v1) = v2 & c_unique(v8) & c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v1) &
% 47.54/7.40  |          c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v2) & c_ssorted(v0)) &  ? [v0: int] :  ?
% 47.54/7.40  |        [v1: c_unique] :  ? [v2: c_ssorted] :  ? [v3: c_unique] :  ? [v4:
% 47.54/7.40  |          c_ssorted] :  ? [v5: int] : (acc(all_190_6, v2) = v3 &
% 47.54/7.40  |          shift(all_190_8, v0) = v1 & ss2Int(v4) = v5 & c_sort(all_190_13, v1)
% 47.54/7.40  |          = v2 & c_sort(c_int, v3) = v4 & c_unique(v3) & c_unique(v1) &
% 47.54/7.40  |          c_ssorted(v4) & c_ssorted(v2) & (v5 = 2000 |  ~ ($lesseq(v0, 2799)) |
% 47.54/7.40  |             ~ ($lesseq(0, v0))))
% 47.54/7.40  | 
% 47.54/7.40  | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 47.54/7.40  |   (3)  $lesseq(all_190_4, all_190_5)
% 47.54/7.40  |   (4)  %(all_190_5, 14) = 0
% 47.54/7.41  |   (5)   ! [v0: c_ssorted] : ( ~ (c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_0) = v0) |  ? [v1:
% 47.54/7.41  |            c_unique] :  ? [v2: c_ssorted] :  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4: int] :  ?
% 47.54/7.41  |          [v5: int] :  ? [v6: c_unique] :  ? [v7: c_ssorted] :  ? [v8:
% 47.54/7.41  |            c_unique] :  ? [v9: int] :  ? [v10: int] : (all_190_4 = 1 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(v5, 10000) = v9 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            whydivide($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v5 & %(v5,
% 47.54/7.41  |              10000) = v10 & %($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v4 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            upd(all_190_1, v0, v7) = v8 & acc(all_190_1, v0) = v1 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9, v0) = 0 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            int2U(v4) = v6 & ss2Int(v2) = v3 & c_sort(c_int, v6) = v7 &
% 47.54/7.41  |            c_sort(c_int, v1) = v2 & c_unique(v8) & c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v1)
% 47.54/7.41  |            & c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v2)))
% 47.54/7.41  |   (6)   ? [v0: c_ssorted] :  ? [v1: c_unique] :  ? [v2: c_ssorted] :  ? [v3:
% 47.54/7.41  |          int] :  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: c_unique] :  ? [v7:
% 47.54/7.41  |          c_ssorted] :  ? [v8: c_unique] :  ? [v9: int] :  ? [v10: int] :
% 47.54/7.41  |        (all_190_4 = 1 & $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(v5, 10000) = v9 &
% 47.54/7.41  |          whydivide($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v5 & %(v5,
% 47.54/7.41  |            10000) = v10 & %($sum($product(10000, v3), all_190_3), 1) = v4 &
% 47.54/7.41  |          upd(all_190_1, v0, v7) = v8 & acc(all_190_1, v0) = v1 &
% 47.54/7.41  |          shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9, v0) = 0 &
% 47.54/7.41  |          int2U(v4) = v6 & ss2Int(v2) = v3 & c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_0) = v0
% 47.54/7.41  |          & c_sort(c_int, v6) = v7 & c_sort(c_int, v1) = v2 & c_unique(v8) &
% 47.54/7.41  |          c_unique(v6) & c_unique(v1) & c_ssorted(v7) & c_ssorted(v2) &
% 47.54/7.41  |          c_ssorted(v0))
% 47.54/7.41  | 
% 47.54/7.41  | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbols all_200_0, all_200_1, all_200_2,
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_3, all_200_4, all_200_5, all_200_6, all_200_7, all_200_8,
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_9, all_200_10 gives:
% 47.54/7.41  |   (7)  all_190_4 = 1 & $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(all_200_5, 10000) =
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_1 & whydivide($sum($product(10000, all_200_7), all_190_3), 1) =
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_5 & %(all_200_5, 10000) = all_200_0 & %($sum($product(10000,
% 47.54/7.41  |              all_200_7), all_190_3), 1) = all_200_6 & upd(all_190_1,
% 47.54/7.41  |          all_200_10, all_200_3) = all_200_2 & acc(all_190_1, all_200_10) =
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_9 & shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9,
% 47.54/7.41  |          all_200_10) = 0 & int2U(all_200_6) = all_200_4 & ss2Int(all_200_8) =
% 47.54/7.41  |        all_200_7 & c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_0) = all_200_10 & c_sort(c_int,
% 47.54/7.41  |          all_200_4) = all_200_3 & c_sort(c_int, all_200_9) = all_200_8 &
% 47.54/7.41  |        c_unique(all_200_2) & c_unique(all_200_4) & c_unique(all_200_9) &
% 47.54/7.41  |        c_ssorted(all_200_3) & c_ssorted(all_200_8) & c_ssorted(all_200_10)
% 47.54/7.41  | 
% 47.54/7.41  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 47.54/7.42  |   (8)  all_190_4 = 1
% 47.54/7.42  |   (9)  c_sort(all_190_13, all_190_0) = all_200_10
% 47.54/7.42  | 
% 47.54/7.42  | REDUCE: (3), (8) imply:
% 47.54/7.42  |   (10)  $lesseq(1, all_190_5)
% 47.54/7.42  | 
% 47.54/7.42  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (formula_99) with all_190_5, simplifying with (4)
% 47.54/7.42  |              gives:
% 47.54/7.42  |   (11)   ~ ($lesseq(all_190_5, 13)) |  ~ ($lesseq(1, all_190_5))
% 47.54/7.42  | 
% 47.54/7.42  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_200_10, simplifying with (9) gives:
% 47.54/7.42  |   (12)   ? [v0: c_unique] :  ? [v1: c_ssorted] :  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: int] :
% 47.54/7.42  |          ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: c_unique] :  ? [v6: c_ssorted] :  ? [v7:
% 47.54/7.42  |           c_unique] :  ? [v8: int] :  ? [v9: int] : (all_190_4 = 1 &
% 47.54/7.42  |           $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(v4, 10000) = v8 &
% 47.54/7.42  |           whydivide($sum($product(10000, v2), all_190_3), 1) = v4 & %(v4,
% 47.54/7.42  |             10000) = v9 & %($sum($product(10000, v2), all_190_3), 1) = v3 &
% 47.54/7.42  |           upd(all_190_1, all_200_10, v6) = v7 & acc(all_190_1, all_200_10) =
% 47.54/7.42  |           v0 & shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9, all_200_10)
% 47.54/7.42  |           = 0 & int2U(v3) = v5 & ss2Int(v1) = v2 & c_sort(c_int, v5) = v6 &
% 47.54/7.42  |           c_sort(c_int, v0) = v1 & c_unique(v7) & c_unique(v5) & c_unique(v0)
% 47.54/7.42  |           & c_ssorted(v6) & c_ssorted(v1))
% 47.54/7.42  | 
% 47.54/7.42  | DELTA: instantiating (12) with fresh symbols all_294_0, all_294_1, all_294_2,
% 47.54/7.42  |        all_294_3, all_294_4, all_294_5, all_294_6, all_294_7, all_294_8,
% 47.54/7.42  |        all_294_9 gives:
% 47.54/7.42  |   (13)  all_190_4 = 1 & $lesseq(all_190_5, 13) & whydivide(all_294_5, 10000) =
% 47.54/7.42  |         all_294_1 & whydivide($sum($product(10000, all_294_7), all_190_3), 1)
% 47.54/7.42  |         = all_294_5 & %(all_294_5, 10000) = all_294_0 & %($sum($product(10000,
% 47.54/7.42  |               all_294_7), all_190_3), 1) = all_294_6 & upd(all_190_1,
% 47.54/7.42  |           all_200_10, all_294_3) = all_294_2 & acc(all_190_1, all_200_10) =
% 47.54/7.42  |         all_294_9 & shift(all_190_8, 1) = all_190_0 & valid(all_190_9,
% 47.54/7.42  |           all_200_10) = 0 & int2U(all_294_6) = all_294_4 & ss2Int(all_294_8) =
% 47.54/7.42  |         all_294_7 & c_sort(c_int, all_294_4) = all_294_3 & c_sort(c_int,
% 47.54/7.42  |           all_294_9) = all_294_8 & c_unique(all_294_2) & c_unique(all_294_4) &
% 47.54/7.42  |         c_unique(all_294_9) & c_ssorted(all_294_3) & c_ssorted(all_294_8)
% 47.54/7.43  | 
% 47.54/7.43  | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 47.54/7.43  |   (14)  $lesseq(all_190_5, 13)
% 47.54/7.43  | 
% 47.54/7.43  | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 47.54/7.43  | 
% 47.54/7.43  | Case 1:
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | |   (15)  $lesseq(14, all_190_5)
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | | COMBINE_INEQS: (14), (15) imply:
% 47.54/7.43  | |   (16)  $false
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | | CLOSE: (16) is inconsistent.
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | Case 2:
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | |   (17)  $lesseq(all_190_5, 0)
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | | COMBINE_INEQS: (10), (17) imply:
% 47.54/7.43  | |   (18)  $false
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | | CLOSE: (18) is inconsistent.
% 47.54/7.43  | | 
% 47.54/7.43  | End of split
% 47.54/7.43  | 
% 47.54/7.43  End of proof
% 47.54/7.43  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 47.54/7.43  
% 47.54/7.43  6829ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------