TSTP Solution File: SWW809_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW809_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:51:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 31.51s 5.04s
% Output   : Proof 37.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SWW809_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 22:38:31 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.58  ________       _____
% 0.15/0.58  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.15/0.58  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.15/0.58  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.15/0.58  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.15/0.58  
% 0.15/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.15/0.58  (2023-06-19)
% 0.15/0.58  
% 0.15/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.15/0.58  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.15/0.58                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.15/0.58  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.15/0.58  
% 0.15/0.58  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.15/0.58  
% 0.15/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.15/0.60  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.15/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/1.00  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 9.64/2.20  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.20  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.20  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.20  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.20  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.21  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 9.64/2.21  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 29.87/4.84  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.43/4.91  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.43/4.96  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.35/5.01  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.35/5.02  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.51/5.03  Prover 0: proved (4417ms)
% 31.51/5.03  
% 31.51/5.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.51/5.04  
% 31.51/5.04  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 31.51/5.04  Prover 4: Found proof (size 1)
% 31.51/5.04  Prover 4: proved (4428ms)
% 31.51/5.05  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 31.51/5.07  Prover 1: stopped
% 31.51/5.12  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.51/5.16  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.51/5.18  Prover 3: stopped
% 32.56/5.30  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 32.56/5.30  Prover 6: stopped
% 34.26/5.45  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 35.44/5.64  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.44/5.64  Prover 5: stopped
% 35.69/5.69  Prover 7: stopped
% 37.58/6.13  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 37.58/6.13  Prover 2: stopped
% 37.58/6.13  
% 37.58/6.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 37.58/6.13  
% 37.58/6.13  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 37.82/6.15  Assumptions after simplification:
% 37.82/6.15  ---------------------------------
% 37.82/6.15  
% 37.82/6.15    (formula_101)
% 37.82/6.16    $false
% 37.82/6.16  
% 37.82/6.16  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 37.82/6.16  --------------------------------------------
% 37.82/6.16  formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95,
% 37.82/6.16  formula_96, formula_97, formula_98, formula_99
% 37.82/6.16  
% 37.82/6.16  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 37.82/6.16  ---------------------------------
% 37.82/6.16  
% 37.82/6.16  Begin of proof
% 37.82/6.16  | 
% 37.82/6.16  | CLOSE: (formula_101) is inconsistent.
% 37.82/6.16  | 
% 37.82/6.16  End of proof
% 37.82/6.16  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 37.82/6.16  
% 37.82/6.16  5575ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------