TSTP Solution File: SWW678_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW678_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:51:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 12.63s 2.63s
% Output   : Proof 21.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWW678_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 18:58:32 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.17/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.17/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.17/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.17/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.17/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.17/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.17/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.17/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.17/0.64  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.17/0.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.84/1.21  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.22  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.36/1.26  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.36/1.26  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.36/1.26  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.36/1.26  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.36/1.26  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 6.20/1.72  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.20/1.75  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.89/1.77  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 7.33/1.90  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 7.33/1.90  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 7.77/1.91  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.77/1.96  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 12.63/2.62  Prover 0: proved (1967ms)
% 12.63/2.63  
% 12.63/2.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.63/2.63  
% 12.63/2.64  Prover 3: stopped
% 12.63/2.64  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 12.63/2.64  Prover 5: stopped
% 12.63/2.64  Prover 2: stopped
% 12.63/2.64  Prover 6: stopped
% 12.63/2.65  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 12.63/2.65  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 12.63/2.65  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 12.63/2.66  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 13.01/2.72  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 13.41/2.78  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 13.49/2.79  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 13.49/2.79  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 13.49/2.80  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 13.49/2.87  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.49/2.88  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.49/2.92  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.49/2.92  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.49/2.92  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.49/2.93  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.49/3.03  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.49/3.03  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.49/3.03  Prover 10: gave up
% 13.49/3.05  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.04/3.06  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 15.52/3.12  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 15.52/3.15  Prover 8: gave up
% 16.16/3.17  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 16.37/3.20  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 16.37/3.21  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.37/3.22  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 17.79/3.43  Prover 7: gave up
% 17.79/3.44  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 17.79/3.45  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 4: Found proof (size 334)
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 4: proved (3029ms)
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 16: stopped
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 1: stopped
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 19: stopped
% 18.92/3.69  Prover 11: stopped
% 18.92/3.70  Prover 13: stopped
% 18.92/3.70  
% 18.92/3.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.92/3.70  
% 19.87/3.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.87/3.77  Assumptions after simplification:
% 19.87/3.77  ---------------------------------
% 19.87/3.77  
% 19.87/3.77    (formula)
% 20.53/3.81    Tree(empty:Tree) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: int] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.53/3.81      (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: Tree] :
% 20.53/3.81      (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 20.53/3.81        node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v1, v2, v3) = v0 & Tree(v3) & Tree(v2))) &  !
% 20.53/3.81    [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1)
% 20.53/3.81      |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v2 &
% 20.53/3.81        right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v2, v1, v3) = v0 &
% 20.53/3.81        Tree(v3))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.53/3.81      (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :
% 20.53/3.81      (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 20.53/3.81        node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v2, v3, v1) = v0 & Tree(v3)))
% 20.53/3.81  
% 20.53/3.81    (formula_005)
% 20.53/3.83    Tree(empty:Tree) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: any]
% 20.53/3.83    : (v1 = empty:Tree |  ~ (in(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) | 
% 20.53/3.83      ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: Tree] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] :
% 20.53/3.83      (in(v0, v5) = v6 & in(v0, v1) = v7 & val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v4 &
% 20.53/3.83        right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v5 & Tree(v5) & (v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v4 =
% 20.53/3.83              v0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree]
% 20.53/3.83    :  ! [v3: any] : (v1 = empty:Tree |  ~ (in(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 20.53/3.83      (right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: Tree] : 
% 20.53/3.83      ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (in(v0, v5) = v6 & in(v0, v1) = v7 &
% 20.53/3.83        val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v4 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v5 & Tree(v5) & (v7 = 0 |
% 20.53/3.83          ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v4 = v0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1:
% 20.53/3.83      Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (in(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 20.53/3.83      (left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ?
% 20.53/3.83      [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: any] : (in(v0, v6) = v7 & in(v0, v1) = v4 &
% 20.53/3.83        val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v5 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) & ( ~ (v4
% 20.53/3.83            = 0) | ( ~ (v1 = empty:Tree) & (v7 = 0 | v5 = v0 | v3 = 0))))) &  !
% 20.53/3.83    [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (in(v0, v2) =
% 20.53/3.83        v3) |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v4: any] :  ?
% 20.53/3.83      [v5: int] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: any] : (in(v0, v6) = v7 & in(v0, v1) =
% 20.53/3.83        v4 & val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v5 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) & ( ~
% 20.53/3.83          (v4 = 0) | ( ~ (v1 = empty:Tree) & (v7 = 0 | v5 = v0 | v3 = 0))))) &  !
% 20.53/3.83    [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.53/3.83      (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5:
% 20.53/3.83        int] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: int] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v3
% 20.53/3.83          = v0) & in(v0, v6) = v7 & in(v0, v4) = v5 & val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v3 &
% 20.53/3.83        left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v4 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) &
% 20.53/3.83        Tree(v4))) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v1 = empty:Tree |  ~ (in(v0,
% 20.53/3.83          v1) = 0) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] : 
% 20.53/3.83      ? [v5: Tree] :  ? [v6: any] : (in(v0, v5) = v6 & in(v0, v3) = v4 &
% 20.53/3.83        val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v3 &
% 20.53/3.83        right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v5 & Tree(v5) & Tree(v3) & (v6 = 0 | v4 = 0 | v2 =
% 20.53/3.83          v0))) &  ! [v0: int] :  ~ (in(v0, empty:Tree) = 0)
% 20.53/3.83  
% 20.53/3.83    (formula_006)
% 20.84/3.86    Tree(empty:Tree) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (searchtree(v0)
% 20.84/3.86        = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v5: any] :  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: int] : (searchtree(v4) =
% 20.84/3.86        v5 & searchtree(v2) = v3 & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v6 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0)
% 20.84/3.86        = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v4) & Tree(v2) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 20.84/3.86          ~ (v3 = 0) | (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(v7, v6) & in(v7, v4) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.86            $lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v6)) & in(v7, v2) = 0)))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :
% 20.84/3.86     ! [v1: int] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |
% 20.84/3.86       ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: Tree] :  ? [v6: any] :
% 20.84/3.86      (searchtree(v5) = v6 & searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v0) = v2 &
% 20.84/3.86        left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v5 & Tree(v5) &
% 20.84/3.86        Tree(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.86              ($lesseq(v7, v1)) |  ~ (in(v7, v5) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.86              ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v1))) |  ~ (in(v7, v3) = 0)))))) &  !
% 20.84/3.86    [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1)
% 20.84/3.86      |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 20.84/3.86       ? [v6: int] : (searchtree(v4) = v5 & searchtree(v1) = v3 & searchtree(v0) =
% 20.84/3.86        v2 & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v6 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v4) & ( ~
% 20.84/3.86          (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v7, v6)) |  ~
% 20.84/3.86              (in(v7, v4) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7,
% 20.84/3.86                    v6))) |  ~ (in(v7, v1) = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1:
% 20.84/3.86      Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) | 
% 20.84/3.86      ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: int] :
% 20.84/3.86      (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v5 & searchtree(v0) = v2 &
% 20.84/3.86        val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v6 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & Tree(v3) & ( ~ (v2 =
% 20.84/3.86            0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v7, v6)) |  ~
% 20.84/3.86              (in(v7, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7,
% 20.84/3.86                    v6))) |  ~ (in(v7, v3) = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1:
% 20.84/3.86      int] : ( ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3:
% 20.84/3.86        any] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v8: int] : (searchtree(v4) = v5 & searchtree(v2) = v3 & searchtree(v0) = v6
% 20.84/3.86        & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v4) &
% 20.84/3.86        Tree(v2) & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) |
% 20.84/3.86              (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(v7, v1) & in(v7, v4) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(1,
% 20.84/3.86                  $difference(v7, v1)) & in(v7, v2) = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  !
% 20.84/3.86    [v1: Tree] : ( ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v8: int] : (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v2 & searchtree(v0) = v6
% 20.84/3.86        & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v5 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & Tree(v3) & (v6 =
% 20.84/3.86          0 | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.86                $lesseq(v7, v5) & in(v7, v3) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(1,
% 20.84/3.86                  $difference(v7, v5)) & in(v7, v1) = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :  !
% 20.84/3.86    [v1: Tree] : ( ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] : 
% 20.84/3.86      ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v8: int] : (searchtree(v2) = v3 & searchtree(v1) = v4 & searchtree(v0) = v6
% 20.84/3.86        & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v5 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & Tree(v2) & (v6 = 0
% 20.84/3.86          | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.86                $lesseq(v7, v5) & in(v7, v1) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(1,
% 20.84/3.86                  $difference(v7, v5)) & in(v7, v2) = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: Tree] :
% 20.84/3.86    (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (searchtree(v0) = 0) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v1: Tree] :  ?
% 20.84/3.86      [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: int] : (searchtree(v2) = 0 & searchtree(v1) = 0 &
% 20.84/3.86        val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v3 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1 &
% 20.84/3.86        right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & Tree(v2) & Tree(v1) &  ! [v4: int] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.86          ($lesseq(v4, v3)) |  ~ (in(v4, v2) = 0)) &  ! [v4: int] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.86          ($lesseq(1, $difference(v4, v3))) |  ~ (in(v4, v1) = 0)))) &  ! [v0:
% 20.84/3.86      int] : (v0 = 0 |  ~ (searchtree(empty:Tree) = v0))
% 20.84/3.86  
% 20.84/3.86    (formula_007)
% 20.84/3.87    Tree(empty:Tree) &  ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree]
% 20.84/3.87    :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: Tree]
% 20.84/3.87    :  ? [v9: int] : (searchtree(v0) = 0 & in(v1, v0) = v5 & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) =
% 20.84/3.87      v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v8) &
% 20.84/3.87      Tree(v6) & Tree(v4) & Tree(v3) & Tree(v0) & ((v5 = 0 & (v0 = empty:Tree | (
% 20.84/3.87              ~ (v2 = v1) & (($lesseq(1, $difference(v1, v2)) &  ~ (in(v1, v4) =
% 20.84/3.87                    0)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(v2, v1)) &  ~ (in(v1, v3) =
% 20.84/3.87                    0)))))) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & (v2 = v1 | ((
% 20.84/3.87                ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v1, v2))) | (v7 = 0 & v6 = v4 & in(v1,
% 20.84/3.87                    v4) = 0)) & ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v2, v1))) | (v9 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.87                  v8 = v3 & in(v1, v3) = 0)))))))
% 20.84/3.87  
% 20.84/3.87    (function-axioms)
% 20.84/3.87     ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: Tree] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 20.84/3.87    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 20.84/3.87      (node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :
% 20.84/3.87     ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 20.84/3.87      (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 20.84/3.87    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (searchtree(v2) = v1)
% 20.84/3.87      |  ~ (searchtree(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: Tree] :
% 20.84/3.87    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v2) = v1) |  ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 20.84/3.87    [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 20.84/3.87      (left:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v1) |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 20.84/3.87      Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v2)
% 20.84/3.87        = v1) |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v0))
% 20.84/3.87  
% 20.84/3.87  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 20.84/3.87  --------------------------------------------
% 20.84/3.87  formula_001, formula_002, formula_003, formula_004
% 20.84/3.87  
% 20.84/3.87  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 20.84/3.87  ---------------------------------
% 20.84/3.87  
% 20.84/3.87  Begin of proof
% 20.84/3.87  | 
% 20.84/3.87  | ALPHA: (formula) implies:
% 20.84/3.88  |   (1)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.84/3.88  |          (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3:
% 20.84/3.88  |            Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v2, v3, v1) = v0 & Tree(v3)))
% 20.84/3.88  |   (2)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.84/3.88  |          (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3:
% 20.84/3.88  |            Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v2, v1, v3) = v0 & Tree(v3)))
% 20.84/3.88  |   (3)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: int] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 20.84/3.88  |          (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3:
% 20.84/3.88  |            Tree] : (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v1, v2, v3) = v0 & Tree(v3) & Tree(v2)))
% 20.84/3.88  | 
% 20.84/3.88  | ALPHA: (formula_005) implies:
% 20.84/3.88  |   (4)   ! [v0: int] :  ~ (in(v0, empty:Tree) = 0)
% 20.84/3.88  |   (5)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v1 = empty:Tree |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |
% 20.84/3.88  |           ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5:
% 20.84/3.88  |            Tree] :  ? [v6: any] : (in(v0, v5) = v6 & in(v0, v3) = v4 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v3 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v5 & Tree(v5) & Tree(v3) & (v6 = 0 | v4 = 0
% 20.84/3.88  |              | v2 = v0)))
% 20.84/3.88  |   (6)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = empty:Tree
% 20.84/3.88  |          |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4: Tree] :
% 20.84/3.88  |           ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: int] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v5 =
% 20.84/3.88  |              0) &  ~ (v3 = v0) & in(v0, v6) = v7 & in(v0, v4) = v5 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v3 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v4 &
% 20.84/3.88  |            right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) & Tree(v4)))
% 20.84/3.89  |   (7)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.89  |          (in(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) | 
% 20.84/3.89  |          ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: any] : (in(v0,
% 20.84/3.89  |              v6) = v7 & in(v0, v1) = v4 & val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v5 &
% 20.84/3.89  |            left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | ( ~ (v1 =
% 20.84/3.89  |                  empty:Tree) & (v7 = 0 | v5 = v0 | v3 = 0)))))
% 20.84/3.89  |   (8)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~
% 20.84/3.89  |          (in(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v2) |  ~ Tree(v1) |  ?
% 20.84/3.89  |          [v4: any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: any] : (in(v0, v6)
% 20.84/3.89  |            = v7 & in(v0, v1) = v4 & val:(Tree)>Int(v1) = v5 &
% 20.84/3.89  |            right:(Tree)>Tree(v1) = v6 & Tree(v6) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | ( ~ (v1 =
% 20.84/3.89  |                  empty:Tree) & (v7 = 0 | v5 = v0 | v3 = 0)))))
% 20.84/3.89  | 
% 20.84/3.89  | ALPHA: (formula_006) implies:
% 20.84/3.89  |   (9)   ! [v0: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~ (searchtree(v0) = 0) |  ~
% 20.84/3.89  |          Tree(v0) |  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: int] :
% 20.84/3.89  |          (searchtree(v2) = 0 & searchtree(v1) = 0 & val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v3 &
% 20.84/3.89  |            left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & Tree(v2) &
% 20.84/3.89  |            Tree(v1) &  ! [v4: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v4, v3)) |  ~ (in(v4, v2) =
% 20.84/3.89  |                0)) &  ! [v4: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v4, v3))) |  ~
% 20.84/3.89  |              (in(v4, v1) = 0))))
% 20.84/3.90  |   (10)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : ( ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 20.84/3.90  |           Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5:
% 20.84/3.90  |             int] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: int] :
% 20.84/3.90  |           (searchtree(v2) = v3 & searchtree(v1) = v4 & searchtree(v0) = v6 &
% 20.84/3.90  |             val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v5 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & Tree(v2) &
% 20.84/3.90  |             (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) | (v8
% 20.84/3.90  |                     = 0 & $lesseq(v7, v5) & in(v7, v1) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.90  |                     $lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v5)) & in(v7, v2) = 0))))))
% 20.84/3.90  |   (11)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : ( ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 20.84/3.90  |           Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5:
% 20.84/3.90  |             int] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: int] :
% 20.84/3.90  |           (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v2 & searchtree(v0) = v6 &
% 20.84/3.90  |             val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v5 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 20.84/3.90  |             (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0) | (v8
% 20.84/3.90  |                     = 0 & $lesseq(v7, v5) & in(v7, v3) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 20.84/3.90  |                     $lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v5)) & in(v7, v1) = 0))))))
% 21.05/3.90  |   (12)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: int] : ( ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 21.05/3.90  |           Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5:
% 21.05/3.90  |             any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: int] :
% 21.05/3.90  |           (searchtree(v4) = v5 & searchtree(v2) = v3 & searchtree(v0) = v6 &
% 21.05/3.90  |             left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v4)
% 21.05/3.90  |             & Tree(v2) & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~
% 21.05/3.90  |                   (v3 = 0) | (v8 = 0 & $lesseq(v7, v1) & in(v7, v4) = 0) | (v8
% 21.05/3.90  |                     = 0 & $lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v1)) & in(v7, v2) =
% 21.05/3.90  |                     0))))))
% 21.05/3.90  |   (13)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 21.05/3.90  |           (right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 21.05/3.90  |             Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: int] :
% 21.05/3.90  |           (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v5 & searchtree(v0) = v2 &
% 21.05/3.90  |             val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v6 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & Tree(v3) & (
% 21.05/3.90  |               ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v7,
% 21.05/3.90  |                       v6)) |  ~ (in(v7, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~
% 21.05/3.90  |                   ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v6))) |  ~ (in(v7, v3) = 0))))))
% 21.05/3.91  |   (14)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 21.05/3.91  |           (left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 21.05/3.91  |             any] :  ? [v4: Tree] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: int] :
% 21.05/3.91  |           (searchtree(v4) = v5 & searchtree(v1) = v3 & searchtree(v0) = v2 &
% 21.05/3.91  |             val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v6 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v4) &
% 21.05/3.91  |             ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v7,
% 21.05/3.91  |                       v6)) |  ~ (in(v7, v4) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~
% 21.05/3.91  |                   ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v6))) |  ~ (in(v7, v1) = 0))))))
% 21.05/3.91  |   (15)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: int] : (v0 = empty:Tree |  ~
% 21.05/3.91  |           (val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v1) |  ~ Tree(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 21.05/3.91  |             Tree] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: Tree] :  ? [v6: any] :
% 21.05/3.91  |           (searchtree(v5) = v6 & searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v0) = v2 &
% 21.05/3.91  |             left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 & right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v5 & Tree(v5)
% 21.05/3.91  |             & Tree(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ! [v7: int] : ( ~
% 21.05/3.91  |                   ($lesseq(v7, v1)) |  ~ (in(v7, v5) = 0)) &  ! [v7: int] : (
% 21.05/3.91  |                   ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v7, v1))) |  ~ (in(v7, v3) =
% 21.05/3.91  |                     0))))))
% 21.05/3.91  | 
% 21.05/3.91  | ALPHA: (formula_007) implies:
% 21.05/3.91  |   (16)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4:
% 21.05/3.91  |           Tree] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: Tree] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: Tree]
% 21.05/3.91  |         :  ? [v9: int] : (searchtree(v0) = 0 & in(v1, v0) = v5 &
% 21.05/3.91  |           val:(Tree)>Int(v0) = v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v3 &
% 21.05/3.91  |           right:(Tree)>Tree(v0) = v4 & Tree(v8) & Tree(v6) & Tree(v4) &
% 21.05/3.91  |           Tree(v3) & Tree(v0) & ((v5 = 0 & (v0 = empty:Tree | ( ~ (v2 = v1) &
% 21.05/3.91  |                   (($lesseq(1, $difference(v1, v2)) &  ~ (in(v1, v4) = 0)) |
% 21.05/3.91  |                     ($lesseq(1, $difference(v2, v1)) &  ~ (in(v1, v3) =
% 21.05/3.91  |                         0)))))) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = empty:Tree) & (v2 =
% 21.05/3.91  |                 v1 | (( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v1, v2))) | (v7 = 0 & v6 =
% 21.05/3.91  |                       v4 & in(v1, v4) = 0)) & ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v2,
% 21.05/3.91  |                           v1))) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = v3 & in(v1, v3) = 0)))))))
% 21.05/3.92  | 
% 21.05/3.92  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 21.05/3.92  |   (17)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 21.05/3.92  |           (right:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v1) |  ~ (right:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v0))
% 21.05/3.92  |   (18)   ! [v0: Tree] :  ! [v1: Tree] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 21.05/3.92  |           (left:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v1) |  ~ (left:(Tree)>Tree(v2) = v0))
% 21.05/3.92  |   (19)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 21.05/3.92  |           (val:(Tree)>Int(v2) = v1) |  ~ (val:(Tree)>Int(v2) = v0))
% 21.05/3.92  |   (20)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 21.05/3.92  |           Tree] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (searchtree(v2) = v1) |  ~ (searchtree(v2) =
% 21.05/3.92  |             v0))
% 21.05/3.92  |   (21)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 21.05/3.92  |           Tree] :  ! [v3: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 21.05/3.92  |               v2) = v0))
% 21.05/3.92  | 
% 21.05/3.92  | DELTA: instantiating (16) with fresh symbols all_13_0, all_13_1, all_13_2,
% 21.05/3.92  |        all_13_3, all_13_4, all_13_5, all_13_6, all_13_7, all_13_8, all_13_9
% 21.05/3.92  |        gives:
% 21.05/3.92  |   (22)  searchtree(all_13_9) = 0 & in(all_13_8, all_13_9) = all_13_4 &
% 21.05/3.92  |         val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_13_7 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.05/3.92  |         all_13_6 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_13_5 & Tree(all_13_1) &
% 21.05/3.92  |         Tree(all_13_3) & Tree(all_13_5) & Tree(all_13_6) & Tree(all_13_9) &
% 21.05/3.92  |         ((all_13_4 = 0 & (all_13_9 = empty:Tree | ( ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8) &
% 21.05/3.92  |                 (($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~
% 21.05/3.92  |                     (in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1,
% 21.05/3.92  |                       $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.05/3.92  |                         all_13_6) = 0)))))) | ( ~ (all_13_4 = 0) &  ~
% 21.05/3.92  |             (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (all_13_7 = all_13_8 | (( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.05/3.92  |                       $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))) | (all_13_2 = 0 &
% 21.05/3.92  |                     all_13_3 = all_13_5 & in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) & ( ~
% 21.05/3.92  |                   ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) | (all_13_0 =
% 21.05/3.92  |                     0 & all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0))))))
% 21.05/3.92  | 
% 21.05/3.92  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 21.05/3.92  |   (23)  Tree(all_13_9)
% 21.05/3.92  |   (24)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_13_5
% 21.05/3.92  |   (25)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_13_6
% 21.05/3.93  |   (26)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_13_7
% 21.05/3.93  |   (27)  in(all_13_8, all_13_9) = all_13_4
% 21.05/3.93  |   (28)  searchtree(all_13_9) = 0
% 21.05/3.93  |   (29)  (all_13_4 = 0 & (all_13_9 = empty:Tree | ( ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8) &
% 21.05/3.93  |               (($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.05/3.93  |                       all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7,
% 21.05/3.93  |                       all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)))))) | ( ~
% 21.05/3.93  |           (all_13_4 = 0) &  ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (all_13_7 = all_13_8 |
% 21.05/3.93  |             (( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))) | (all_13_2 = 0
% 21.05/3.93  |                   & all_13_3 = all_13_5 & in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) & ( ~
% 21.05/3.93  |                 ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) | (all_13_0 = 0
% 21.05/3.93  |                   & all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)))))
% 21.05/3.93  | 
% 21.05/3.93  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with all_13_9, all_13_5, simplifying with
% 21.05/3.93  |              (23), (24) gives:
% 21.05/3.93  |   (30)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] : 
% 21.05/3.93  |         ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v1) = v2 &
% 21.05/3.93  |           searchtree(all_13_5) = v3 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.05/3.93  |           val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.05/3.93  |           Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.05/3.93  |                 ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, all_13_5) = 0)) &  ! [v5: int]
% 21.05/3.93  |               : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5, v4))) |  ~ (in(v5, v1) =
% 21.05/3.93  |                   0)))))
% 21.05/3.93  | 
% 21.05/3.93  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_13_9, all_13_5, simplifying with (23),
% 21.05/3.93  |              (24) gives:
% 21.05/3.94  |   (31)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :
% 21.05/3.94  |         (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.05/3.94  |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, v1, all_13_5) = all_13_9 & Tree(v1))
% 21.05/3.94  | 
% 21.05/3.94  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_13_9, all_13_5, simplifying with
% 21.05/3.94  |              (23), (24) gives:
% 21.05/3.94  |   (32)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4:
% 21.05/3.94  |           any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : (searchtree(v0) = v1 &
% 21.05/3.94  |           searchtree(all_13_5) = v2 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.05/3.94  |           val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v3 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.05/3.94  |           Tree(v0) & (v4 = 0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~
% 21.05/3.94  |                 (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & $lesseq(v5, v3) & in(v5, all_13_5) = 0) |
% 21.05/3.94  |                 (v6 = 0 & $lesseq(1, $difference(v5, v3)) & in(v5, v0) =
% 21.05/3.94  |                   0)))))
% 21.05/3.94  | 
% 21.05/3.94  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with all_13_9, all_13_6, simplifying with
% 21.05/3.94  |              (23), (25) gives:
% 21.25/3.94  |   (33)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: Tree] : 
% 21.25/3.94  |         ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v2) = v3 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           searchtree(all_13_6) = v1 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           Tree(v2) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.94  |                 ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, v2) = 0)) &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.94  |                 ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5, v4))) |  ~ (in(v5, all_13_6) =
% 21.25/3.94  |                   0)))))
% 21.25/3.94  | 
% 21.25/3.94  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_13_9, all_13_6, simplifying with (23),
% 21.25/3.94  |              (25) gives:
% 21.25/3.94  |   (34)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :
% 21.25/3.94  |         (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, all_13_6, v1) = all_13_9 & Tree(v1))
% 21.25/3.94  | 
% 21.25/3.94  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_13_9, all_13_6, simplifying with
% 21.25/3.94  |              (23), (25) gives:
% 21.25/3.94  |   (35)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: int] :  ? [v4:
% 21.25/3.94  |           any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : (searchtree(v1) = v2 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           searchtree(all_13_6) = v0 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v3 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.94  |           Tree(v1) & (v4 = 0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~
% 21.25/3.94  |                 (v0 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & $lesseq(v5, v3) & in(v5, v1) = 0) | (v6 =
% 21.25/3.94  |                   0 & $lesseq(1, $difference(v5, v3)) & in(v5, all_13_6) =
% 21.25/3.94  |                   0)))))
% 21.25/3.94  | 
% 21.25/3.94  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (15) with all_13_9, all_13_7, simplifying with
% 21.25/3.94  |              (23), (26) gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (36)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] : 
% 21.25/3.95  |         ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] : (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) =
% 21.25/3.95  |           v2 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.95  |           right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) & Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0 =
% 21.25/3.95  |               0) | (v4 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v5,
% 21.25/3.95  |                     all_13_7)) |  ~ (in(v5, v3) = 0)) &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.95  |                 ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5, all_13_7))) |  ~ (in(v5, v1) =
% 21.25/3.95  |                   0)))))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_13_9, all_13_7, simplifying with (23),
% 21.25/3.95  |              (26) gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (37)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] :
% 21.25/3.95  |         (left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.95  |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_13_7, v0, v1) = all_13_9 & Tree(v1) &
% 21.25/3.95  |           Tree(v0))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_13_9, all_13_7, simplifying with
% 21.25/3.95  |              (23), (26) gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (38)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4:
% 21.25/3.95  |           any] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : (searchtree(v2) = v3 &
% 21.25/3.95  |           searchtree(v0) = v1 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.25/3.95  |           left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 &
% 21.25/3.95  |           Tree(v2) & Tree(v0) & (v4 = 0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~
% 21.25/3.95  |                 (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & $lesseq(v5, all_13_7) &
% 21.25/3.95  |                   in(v5, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & $lesseq(1, $difference(v5,
% 21.25/3.95  |                       all_13_7)) & in(v5, v0) = 0)))))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_13_8, all_13_9, all_13_4, simplifying
% 21.25/3.95  |              with (23), (27) gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (39)  all_13_4 = 0 | all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] : 
% 21.25/3.95  |         ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v2 =
% 21.25/3.95  |             0) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_8) & in(all_13_8, v3) = v4 & in(all_13_8, v1)
% 21.25/3.95  |           = v2 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/3.95  |           v1 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) & Tree(v1))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_13_9, simplifying with (23), (28)
% 21.25/3.95  |              gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (40)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: int] :
% 21.25/3.95  |         (searchtree(v1) = 0 & searchtree(v0) = 0 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/3.95  |           v2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/3.95  |           v1 & Tree(v1) & Tree(v0) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v3, v2)) |  ~
% 21.25/3.95  |             (in(v3, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v3,
% 21.25/3.95  |                   v2))) |  ~ (in(v3, v0) = 0)))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | DELTA: instantiating (35) with fresh symbols all_20_0, all_20_1, all_20_2,
% 21.25/3.95  |        all_20_3, all_20_4, all_20_5, all_20_6 gives:
% 21.25/3.95  |   (41)  searchtree(all_20_5) = all_20_4 & searchtree(all_13_6) = all_20_6 &
% 21.25/3.95  |         searchtree(all_13_9) = all_20_2 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_20_3
% 21.25/3.95  |         & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_20_5 & Tree(all_20_5) & (all_20_2
% 21.25/3.95  |           = 0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (all_20_4 = 0) |  ~
% 21.25/3.95  |               (all_20_6 = 0) | (all_20_0 = 0 & $lesseq(all_20_1, all_20_3) &
% 21.25/3.95  |                 in(all_20_1, all_20_5) = 0) | (all_20_0 = 0 & $lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.95  |                   $difference(all_20_1, all_20_3)) & in(all_20_1, all_13_6) =
% 21.25/3.95  |                 0))))
% 21.25/3.95  | 
% 21.25/3.95  | ALPHA: (41) implies:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (42)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_20_5
% 21.25/3.96  |   (43)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_20_3
% 21.25/3.96  |   (44)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_20_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbols all_22_0, all_22_1, all_22_2,
% 21.25/3.96  |        all_22_3, all_22_4, all_22_5, all_22_6 gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (45)  searchtree(all_22_6) = all_22_5 & searchtree(all_13_5) = all_22_4 &
% 21.25/3.96  |         searchtree(all_13_9) = all_22_2 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_22_3
% 21.25/3.96  |         & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_22_6 & Tree(all_22_6) & (all_22_2 =
% 21.25/3.96  |           0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~ (all_22_4 = 0) |  ~ (all_22_5
% 21.25/3.96  |                 = 0) | (all_22_0 = 0 & $lesseq(all_22_1, all_22_3) &
% 21.25/3.96  |                 in(all_22_1, all_13_5) = 0) | (all_22_0 = 0 & $lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.96  |                   $difference(all_22_1, all_22_3)) & in(all_22_1, all_22_6) =
% 21.25/3.96  |                 0))))
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | ALPHA: (45) implies:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (46)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_22_6
% 21.25/3.96  |   (47)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_22_3
% 21.25/3.96  |   (48)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_22_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | DELTA: instantiating (38) with fresh symbols all_24_0, all_24_1, all_24_2,
% 21.25/3.96  |        all_24_3, all_24_4, all_24_5, all_24_6 gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (49)  searchtree(all_24_4) = all_24_3 & searchtree(all_24_6) = all_24_5 &
% 21.25/3.96  |         searchtree(all_13_9) = all_24_2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/3.96  |         all_24_6 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_24_4 & Tree(all_24_4) &
% 21.25/3.96  |         Tree(all_24_6) & (all_24_2 = 0 | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & ( ~
% 21.25/3.96  |               (all_24_3 = 0) |  ~ (all_24_5 = 0) | (all_24_0 = 0 &
% 21.25/3.96  |                 $lesseq(all_24_1, all_13_7) & in(all_24_1, all_24_4) = 0) |
% 21.25/3.96  |               (all_24_0 = 0 & $lesseq(1, $difference(all_24_1, all_13_7)) &
% 21.25/3.96  |                 in(all_24_1, all_24_6) = 0))))
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | ALPHA: (49) implies:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (50)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_24_4
% 21.25/3.96  |   (51)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_24_6
% 21.25/3.96  |   (52)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_24_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_13_5, all_24_4, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (24), (50) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (53)  all_24_4 = all_13_5
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_20_5, all_24_4, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (42), (50) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (54)  all_24_4 = all_20_5
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_13_6, all_24_6, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (25), (51) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (55)  all_24_6 = all_13_6
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_22_6, all_24_6, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (46), (51) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (56)  all_24_6 = all_22_6
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_13_7, all_22_3, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (26), (47) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (57)  all_22_3 = all_13_7
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_20_3, all_22_3, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (43), (47) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (58)  all_22_3 = all_20_3
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with 0, all_22_2, all_13_9, simplifying with
% 21.25/3.96  |              (28), (48) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (59)  all_22_2 = 0
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_22_2, all_24_2, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (48), (52) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (60)  all_24_2 = all_22_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_20_2, all_24_2, all_13_9, simplifying
% 21.25/3.96  |              with (44), (52) gives:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (61)  all_24_2 = all_20_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | COMBINE_EQS: (60), (61) imply:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (62)  all_22_2 = all_20_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | SIMP: (62) implies:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (63)  all_22_2 = all_20_2
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | COMBINE_EQS: (53), (54) imply:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (64)  all_20_5 = all_13_5
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | COMBINE_EQS: (55), (56) imply:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (65)  all_22_6 = all_13_6
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | COMBINE_EQS: (59), (63) imply:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (66)  all_20_2 = 0
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | SIMP: (66) implies:
% 21.25/3.96  |   (67)  all_20_2 = 0
% 21.25/3.96  | 
% 21.25/3.96  | COMBINE_EQS: (57), (58) imply:
% 21.25/3.97  |   (68)  all_20_3 = all_13_7
% 21.25/3.97  | 
% 21.25/3.97  | BETA: splitting (29) gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | 
% 21.25/3.97  | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | |   (69)  all_13_4 = 0 & (all_13_9 = empty:Tree | ( ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8) &
% 21.25/3.97  | |             (($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/3.97  | |                     all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7,
% 21.25/3.97  | |                     all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)))))
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | ALPHA: (69) implies:
% 21.25/3.97  | |   (70)  all_13_4 = 0
% 21.25/3.97  | |   (71)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree | ( ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8) & (($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.97  | |                 $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/3.97  | |                   all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7,
% 21.25/3.97  | |                   all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0))))
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | REDUCE: (27), (70) imply:
% 21.25/3.97  | |   (72)  in(all_13_8, all_13_9) = 0
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_13_8, all_13_9, simplifying with
% 21.25/3.97  | |              (23), (72) gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | |   (73)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any]
% 21.25/3.97  | |         :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(all_13_8, v3) = v4 &
% 21.25/3.97  | |           in(all_13_8, v1) = v2 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/3.97  | |           left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3
% 21.25/3.97  | |           & Tree(v3) & Tree(v1) & (v4 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v0 = all_13_8))
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | BETA: splitting (37) gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (74)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | REDUCE: (72), (74) imply:
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (75)  in(all_13_8, empty:Tree) = 0
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_13_8, simplifying with (75) gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (76)  $false
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | CLOSE: (76) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (77)   ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree)
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (78)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/3.97  | | |           right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.97  | | |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_13_7, v0, v1) = all_13_9 &
% 21.25/3.97  | | |           Tree(v1) & Tree(v0))
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | DELTA: instantiating (78) with fresh symbols all_48_0, all_48_1 gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (79)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_48_1 &
% 21.25/3.97  | | |         right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_48_0 &
% 21.25/3.97  | | |         node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_13_7, all_48_1, all_48_0) = all_13_9
% 21.25/3.97  | | |         & Tree(all_48_0) & Tree(all_48_1)
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | ALPHA: (79) implies:
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (80)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_48_0
% 21.25/3.97  | | |   (81)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_48_1
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | BETA: splitting (34) gives:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | |   (82)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | REDUCE: (77), (82) imply:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | |   (83)  $false
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | CLOSE: (83) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.97  | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.97  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |   (84)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |           right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, all_13_6, v1) = all_13_9 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |           Tree(v1))
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (84) with fresh symbols all_54_0, all_54_1 gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |   (85)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_54_1 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |         right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_54_0 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |         node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_54_1, all_13_6, all_54_0) =
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |         all_13_9 & Tree(all_54_0)
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | ALPHA: (85) implies:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |   (86)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_54_0
% 21.25/3.98  | | | |   (87)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_54_1
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (88)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (88) imply:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (89)  $false
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | CLOSE: (89) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (90)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |           & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |           node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, v1, all_13_5) = all_13_9 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |           Tree(v1))
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (90) with fresh symbols all_60_0, all_60_1 gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (91)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_60_1 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |         left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_60_0 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |         node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_60_1, all_60_0, all_13_5) =
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |         all_13_9 & Tree(all_60_0)
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | ALPHA: (91) implies:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (92)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_60_0
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | |   (93)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_60_1
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (94)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (94) imply:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (95)  $false
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | CLOSE: (95) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (96)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: Tree]
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |         :  ? [v4: any] : (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v2
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |           & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |           v1 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |           Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int]
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |               : ( ~ ($lesseq(v5, all_13_7)) |  ~ (in(v5, v3) = 0)) &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |                ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |                       all_13_7))) |  ~ (in(v5, v1) = 0)))))
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (96) with fresh symbols all_66_0, all_66_1,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |        all_66_2, all_66_3, all_66_4 gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (97)  searchtree(all_66_1) = all_66_0 & searchtree(all_66_3) =
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |         all_66_2 & searchtree(all_13_9) = all_66_4 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |         left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_66_3 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |         right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_66_1 & Tree(all_66_1) &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |         Tree(all_66_3) & ( ~ (all_66_4 = 0) | (all_66_0 = 0 &
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |             all_66_2 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |                   all_13_7)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_66_1) = 0)) &  ! [v0:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |               int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_13_7))) | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |               ~ (in(v0, all_66_3) = 0))))
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | ALPHA: (97) implies:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (98)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_66_1
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (99)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_66_3
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | |   (100)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_66_4
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (71) gives:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |   (101)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (101) imply:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |   (102)  $false
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (102) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |   (103)   ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8) & (($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |                $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |                  all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |                $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | |                  all_13_6) = 0)))
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.98  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (103) implies:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | |   (104)  ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | |            (in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) | ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | |              $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8)) &  ~ (in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | |                all_13_6) = 0))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (30) gives:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (105)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (105) imply:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (106)  $false
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (106) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (107)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |            any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v1) = v2 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |            searchtree(all_13_5) = v3 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |            & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 & Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                  ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, all_13_5) = 0))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                        v4))) |  ~ (in(v5, v1) = 0)))))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (107) with fresh symbols all_76_0,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |        all_76_1, all_76_2, all_76_3, all_76_4 gives:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (108)  searchtree(all_76_3) = all_76_2 & searchtree(all_13_5)
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |          = all_76_1 & searchtree(all_13_9) = all_76_4 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_76_0 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_76_3 & Tree(all_76_3)
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |          & ( ~ (all_76_4 = 0) | (all_76_1 = 0 & all_76_2 = 0 & 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |              ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, all_76_0)) |  ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                (in(v0, all_13_5) = 0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_76_0))) |  ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                (in(v0, all_76_3) = 0))))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (108) implies:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (109)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_76_3
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (110)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_76_0
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (111)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_76_4
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |   (112)   ~ (all_76_4 = 0) | (all_76_1 = 0 & all_76_2 = 0 &  !
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |            [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, all_76_0)) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |                  all_13_5) = 0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |              ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_76_0))) |  ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | |              (in(v0, all_76_3) = 0)))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (40) gives:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |   (113)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (113) imply:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |   (114)  $false
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (114) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |   (115)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: int] :
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |          (searchtree(v1) = 0 & searchtree(v0) = 0 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v2 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 & Tree(v1) &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |            Tree(v0) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v3, v2)) | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |              ~ (in(v3, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |              ($lesseq(1, $difference(v3, v2))) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |                  v0) = 0)))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (115) with fresh symbols all_82_0,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |        all_82_1, all_82_2 gives:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |   (116)  searchtree(all_82_1) = 0 & searchtree(all_82_2) = 0 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_82_0 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_2 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_1 &
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |          Tree(all_82_1) & Tree(all_82_2) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |            ($lesseq(v0, all_82_0)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_82_1) =
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |              0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |                $difference(v0, all_82_0))) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |                all_82_2) = 0))
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (116) implies:
% 21.25/3.99  | | | | | | | | |   (117)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_1
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | |   (118)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_2
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | |   (119)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_82_0
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (120)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (120) imply:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (121)  $false
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (121) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (122)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ?
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          [v3: any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v2) = v3 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |            searchtree(all_13_6) = v1 & searchtree(all_13_9)
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |            = v0 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 & Tree(v2) & ( ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |              (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : (
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                  ~ ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, v2) = 0))
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                      $difference(v5, v4))) |  ~ (in(v5,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                      all_13_6) = 0)))))
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (122) with fresh symbols all_89_0,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |        all_89_1, all_89_2, all_89_3, all_89_4 gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (123)  searchtree(all_89_2) = all_89_1 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          searchtree(all_13_6) = all_89_3 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          searchtree(all_13_9) = all_89_4 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_89_0 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_89_2 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |          Tree(all_89_2) & ( ~ (all_89_4 = 0) | (all_89_1 = 0
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |              & all_89_3 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                ($lesseq(v0, all_89_0)) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                    all_89_2) = 0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_89_0))) |  ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |                (in(v0, all_13_6) = 0))))
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (123) implies:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (124)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_89_2
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (125)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_89_0
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (126)  searchtree(all_13_9) = all_89_4
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |   (127)   ~ (all_89_4 = 0) | (all_89_1 = 0 & all_89_3 = 0 & 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |            ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, all_89_0)) |  ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |              (in(v0, all_89_2) = 0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |              ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_89_0))) |  ~
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | |              (in(v0, all_13_6) = 0)))
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (73) gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (128)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (77), (128) imply:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (129)  $false
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (129) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (130)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ?
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |          [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(all_13_8, v3) = v4
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            & in(all_13_8, v1) = v2 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            Tree(v1) & (v4 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v0 = all_13_8))
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (130) with fresh symbols all_95_0,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_95_1, all_95_2, all_95_3, all_95_4 gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (131)  in(all_13_8, all_95_1) = all_95_0 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            all_95_3) = all_95_2 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9)
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |          = all_95_4 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_95_3
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |          & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_95_1 &
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |          Tree(all_95_1) & Tree(all_95_3) & (all_95_0 = 0 |
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |            all_95_2 = 0 | all_95_4 = all_13_8)
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (131) implies:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (132)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_95_1
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (133)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_95_3
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (134)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_95_4
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (135)  in(all_13_8, all_95_3) = all_95_2
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (136)  in(all_13_8, all_95_1) = all_95_0
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (137)  all_95_0 = 0 | all_95_2 = 0 | all_95_4 = all_13_8
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_13_5, all_66_1,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (24), (98) gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (138)  all_66_1 = all_13_5
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_48_0, all_66_1,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (80), (98) gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (139)  all_66_1 = all_48_0
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_66_1, all_82_1,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (98), (117) gives:
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |   (140)  all_82_1 = all_66_1
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_82_1, all_89_2,
% 21.25/4.00  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (117), (124) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (141)  all_89_2 = all_82_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_89_2, all_95_1,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (124), (132) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (142)  all_95_1 = all_89_2
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_54_0, all_95_1,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (86), (132) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (143)  all_95_1 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_13_6, all_82_2,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (25), (118) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (144)  all_82_2 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_76_3, all_82_2,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (109), (118) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (145)  all_82_2 = all_76_3
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_66_3, all_82_2,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (99), (118) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (146)  all_82_2 = all_66_3
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_48_1, all_82_2,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (81), (118) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (147)  all_82_2 = all_48_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_82_2, all_95_3,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (118), (133) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (148)  all_95_3 = all_82_2
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_60_0, all_95_3,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (92), (133) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (149)  all_95_3 = all_60_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_13_7, all_60_1,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (26), (93) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (150)  all_60_1 = all_13_7
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_60_1, all_76_0,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (93), (110) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (151)  all_76_0 = all_60_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_76_0, all_82_0,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (110), (119) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (152)  all_82_0 = all_76_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_82_0, all_89_0,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (119), (125) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (153)  all_89_0 = all_82_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_89_0, all_95_4,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (125), (134) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (154)  all_95_4 = all_89_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_54_1, all_95_4,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (87), (134) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (155)  all_95_4 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with 0, all_76_4, all_13_9,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (28), (111) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (156)  all_76_4 = 0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_76_4, all_89_4,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (111), (126) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (157)  all_89_4 = all_76_4
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_66_4, all_89_4,
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (100), (126) gives:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (158)  all_89_4 = all_66_4
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (142), (143) imply:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (159)  all_89_2 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (159) implies:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (160)  all_89_2 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (148), (149) imply:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (161)  all_82_2 = all_60_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (161) implies:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (162)  all_82_2 = all_60_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (154), (155) imply:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (163)  all_89_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (163) implies:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (164)  all_89_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (153), (164) imply:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (165)  all_82_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (165) implies:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (166)  all_82_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (141), (160) imply:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (167)  all_82_1 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (167) implies:
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | |   (168)  all_82_1 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.01  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (157), (158) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (169)  all_76_4 = all_66_4
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (169) implies:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (170)  all_76_4 = all_66_4
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (152), (166) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (171)  all_76_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (171) implies:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (172)  all_76_0 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (140), (168) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (173)  all_66_1 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (173) implies:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (174)  all_66_1 = all_54_0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (145), (162) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (175)  all_76_3 = all_60_0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (145), (147) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (176)  all_76_3 = all_48_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (145), (146) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (177)  all_76_3 = all_66_3
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (144), (145) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (178)  all_76_3 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (151), (172) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (179)  all_60_1 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (179) implies:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (180)  all_60_1 = all_54_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (176), (177) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (181)  all_66_3 = all_48_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (177), (178) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (182)  all_66_3 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (175), (177) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (183)  all_66_3 = all_60_0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (156), (170) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (184)  all_66_4 = 0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (139), (174) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (185)  all_54_0 = all_48_0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (138), (174) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (186)  all_54_0 = all_13_5
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (181), (183) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (187)  all_60_0 = all_48_1
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (182), (183) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (188)  all_60_0 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (187), (188) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (189)  all_48_1 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (150), (180) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (190)  all_54_1 = all_13_7
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (185), (186) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (191)  all_48_0 = all_13_5
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (172), (190) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (192)  all_76_0 = all_13_7
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (158), (184) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (193)  all_89_4 = 0
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (164), (190) imply:
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | |   (194)  all_89_0 = all_13_7
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.02  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (155), (190) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | |   (195)  all_95_4 = all_13_7
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (149), (188) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | |   (196)  all_95_3 = all_13_6
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (143), (186) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | |   (197)  all_95_1 = all_13_5
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (136), (197) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | |   (198)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = all_95_0
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (135), (196) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | |   (199)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = all_95_2
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (127) gives:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (200)   ~ (all_89_4 = 0)
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (193), (200) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (201)  $false
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (201) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (202)  all_89_1 = 0 & all_89_3 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |            ($lesseq(v0, all_89_0)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_89_2) =
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |              0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |                $difference(v0, all_89_0))) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |                all_13_6) = 0))
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (202) implies:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (203)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0,
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | |                  all_89_0))) |  ~ (in(v0, all_13_6) = 0))
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (112) gives:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (204)   ~ (all_76_4 = 0)
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (156), (204) imply:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (205)  $false
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (205) is inconsistent.
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (206)  all_76_1 = 0 & all_76_2 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            ($lesseq(v0, all_76_0)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_13_5) =
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                $difference(v0, all_76_0))) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                all_76_3) = 0))
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.03  | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (206) implies:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (207)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, all_76_0)) |  ~
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            (in(v0, all_13_5) = 0))
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_13_8, all_13_9,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_6, all_95_2, simplifying with (23), (25),
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              (199) gives:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (208)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ?
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          [v3: any] : (in(all_13_8, v2) = v3 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9) = v0 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v1
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 & Tree(v2) &
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            ( ~ (v0 = 0) | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (v3
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                  = 0 | v1 = all_13_8 | all_95_2 = 0))))
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_13_8, all_13_9,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_5, all_95_0, simplifying with (23), (24),
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              (198) gives:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (209)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ?
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          [v3: any] : (in(all_13_8, v2) = v3 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9) = v0 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v1
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 & Tree(v2) & (
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              ~ (v0 = 0) | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (v3
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                  = 0 | v1 = all_13_8 | all_95_0 = 0))))
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (209) with fresh symbols all_121_0,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |        all_121_1, all_121_2, all_121_3 gives:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (210)  in(all_13_8, all_121_1) = all_121_0 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            all_13_9) = all_121_3 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9)
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          = all_121_2 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          all_121_1 & Tree(all_121_1) & ( ~ (all_121_3 = 0)
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (all_121_0 = 0 |
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                all_121_2 = all_13_8 | all_95_0 = 0)))
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (210) implies:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (211)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_121_1
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (212)  in(all_13_8, all_121_1) = all_121_0
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (208) with fresh symbols all_123_0,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |        all_123_1, all_123_2, all_123_3 gives:
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (213)  in(all_13_8, all_123_1) = all_123_0 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            all_13_9) = all_123_3 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9)
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          = all_123_2 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) =
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |          all_123_1 & Tree(all_123_1) & ( ~ (all_123_3 = 0)
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            | ( ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (all_123_0 = 0 |
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |                all_123_2 = all_13_8 | all_95_2 = 0)))
% 21.25/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (213) implies:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (214)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_123_1
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (215)  in(all_13_8, all_123_1) = all_123_0
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_13_5, all_123_1,
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (24), (214) gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (216)  all_123_1 = all_13_5
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_13_6, all_121_1,
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (25), (211) gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (217)  all_121_1 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (215), (216) imply:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (218)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = all_123_0
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (212), (217) imply:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (219)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = all_121_0
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_95_2, all_121_0,
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_6, all_13_8, simplifying with (199), (219)
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (220)  all_121_0 = all_95_2
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_95_0, all_123_0,
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_5, all_13_8, simplifying with (198), (218)
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (221)  all_123_0 = all_95_0
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (104) gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (222)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)) &  ~
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |          (in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (222) implies:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (223)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (224)   ~ (in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (137) gives:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (225)  all_95_0 = 0
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.04  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (198), (225) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (226)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (224), (226) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (227)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (227) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (228)  all_95_2 = 0 | all_95_4 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (228) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (229)  all_95_2 = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (199), (229) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (230)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (203) with all_13_8, simplifying
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              with (230) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (231)  $lesseq(all_13_8, all_89_0)
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (194), (231) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (232)  $lesseq(all_13_8, all_13_7)
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (223), (232) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (233)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (233) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (234)  all_95_4 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (195), (234) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (235)  all_13_7 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (235) implies:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (236)  all_13_7 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (223), (236) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (237)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (237) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (238)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8)) &  ~
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |          (in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (238) implies:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (239)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (240)   ~ (in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (137) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (241)  all_95_0 = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (198), (241) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (242)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (207) with all_13_8, simplifying
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              with (242) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (243)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_76_0))
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (192), (243) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (244)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (239), (244) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (245)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (245) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (246)  all_95_2 = 0 | all_95_4 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (246) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (247)  all_95_2 = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (199), (247) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (248)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (240), (248) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (249)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (249) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (250)  all_95_4 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (195), (250) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (251)  all_13_7 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (251) implies:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (252)  all_13_7 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (239), (252) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (253)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (253) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | End of split
% 21.69/4.05  | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | |   (254)   ~ (all_13_4 = 0) &  ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree) & (all_13_7 =
% 21.69/4.05  | |            all_13_8 | (( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))) |
% 21.69/4.05  | |                (all_13_2 = 0 & all_13_3 = all_13_5 & in(all_13_8, all_13_5)
% 21.69/4.05  | |                  = 0)) & ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) |
% 21.69/4.05  | |                (all_13_0 = 0 & all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8, all_13_6)
% 21.69/4.05  | |                  = 0))))
% 21.69/4.05  | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | ALPHA: (254) implies:
% 21.69/4.05  | |   (255)   ~ (all_13_9 = empty:Tree)
% 21.69/4.05  | |   (256)   ~ (all_13_4 = 0)
% 21.69/4.05  | |   (257)  all_13_7 = all_13_8 | (( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8,
% 21.69/4.05  | |                    all_13_7))) | (all_13_2 = 0 & all_13_3 = all_13_5 &
% 21.69/4.05  | |                in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) & ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.69/4.05  | |                  $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) | (all_13_0 = 0 &
% 21.69/4.05  | |                all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0)))
% 21.69/4.05  | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | BETA: splitting (37) gives:
% 21.69/4.05  | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | |   (258)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | REDUCE: (255), (258) imply:
% 21.69/4.05  | | |   (259)  $false
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | | CLOSE: (259) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.05  | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.05  | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | |   (260)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0
% 21.69/4.06  | | |            & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_13_7, v0, v1) = all_13_9 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | |            Tree(v1) & Tree(v0))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | DELTA: instantiating (260) with fresh symbols all_45_0, all_45_1 gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | |   (261)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_45_1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_45_0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | |          node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_13_7, all_45_1, all_45_0) =
% 21.69/4.06  | | |          all_13_9 & Tree(all_45_0) & Tree(all_45_1)
% 21.69/4.06  | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | ALPHA: (261) implies:
% 21.69/4.06  | | |   (262)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_45_0
% 21.69/4.06  | | |   (263)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_45_1
% 21.69/4.06  | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | BETA: splitting (34) gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (264)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | REDUCE: (255), (264) imply:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (265)  $false
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | CLOSE: (265) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (266)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, all_13_6, v1) = all_13_9 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |            Tree(v1))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (266) with fresh symbols all_51_0, all_51_1 gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (267)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_51_1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_51_0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |          node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_51_1, all_13_6, all_51_0) =
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |          all_13_9 & Tree(all_51_0)
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | ALPHA: (267) implies:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (268)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.06  | | | |   (269)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (270)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (270) imply:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (271)  $false
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | CLOSE: (271) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (272)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] : (val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |            & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |            node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(v0, v1, all_13_5) = all_13_9 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |            Tree(v1))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (272) with fresh symbols all_57_0, all_57_1
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |        gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (273)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_57_1 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_57_0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |          node:(Int*Tree*Tree)>Tree(all_57_1, all_57_0, all_13_5) =
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |          all_13_9 & Tree(all_57_0)
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | ALPHA: (273) implies:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (274)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | |   (275)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_57_1
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (276)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (276) imply:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (277)  $false
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | CLOSE: (277) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (278)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: Tree]
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |          :  ? [v4: any] : (searchtree(v3) = v4 & searchtree(v1) = v2
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |            & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 & left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9)
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |            = v1 & right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |            Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int]
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                : ( ~ ($lesseq(v5, all_13_7)) |  ~ (in(v5, v3) = 0))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5,
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                        all_13_7))) |  ~ (in(v5, v1) = 0)))))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (278) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1,
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |        all_63_2, all_63_3, all_63_4 gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (279)  searchtree(all_63_1) = all_63_0 & searchtree(all_63_3) =
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |          all_63_2 & searchtree(all_13_9) = all_63_4 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_63_3 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_63_1 & Tree(all_63_1) &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |          Tree(all_63_3) & ( ~ (all_63_4 = 0) | (all_63_0 = 0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |              all_63_2 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0,
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                    all_13_7)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_63_1) = 0)) &  ! [v0:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_13_7))) | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |                ~ (in(v0, all_63_3) = 0))))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | ALPHA: (279) implies:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (280)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_63_1
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | |   (281)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_63_3
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (30) gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (282)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (282) imply:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (283)  $false
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (283) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (284)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |            any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v1) = v2 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |            searchtree(all_13_5) = v3 & searchtree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 & Tree(v1) & ( ~ (v0 =
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                0) | (v3 = 0 & v2 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                  ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, all_13_5) = 0)) & 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                ! [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5, v4)))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                  |  ~ (in(v5, v1) = 0)))))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (284) with fresh symbols all_69_0, all_69_1,
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |        all_69_2, all_69_3, all_69_4 gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (285)  searchtree(all_69_3) = all_69_2 & searchtree(all_13_5) =
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |          all_69_1 & searchtree(all_13_9) = all_69_4 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_69_0 &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_69_3 & Tree(all_69_3) &
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |          ( ~ (all_69_4 = 0) | (all_69_1 = 0 & all_69_2 = 0 &  !
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |              [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, all_69_0)) |  ~ (in(v0,
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                    all_13_5) = 0)) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_69_0))) |  ~
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |                (in(v0, all_69_3) = 0))))
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (285) implies:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (286)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_69_3
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | |   (287)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_69_0
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (40) gives:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | |   (288)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (288) imply:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | |   (289)  $false
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (289) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |   (290)   ? [v0: Tree] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: int] :
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |          (searchtree(v1) = 0 & searchtree(v0) = 0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 & Tree(v1) &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            Tree(v0) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v3, v2)) |  ~
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |              (in(v3, v1) = 0)) &  ! [v3: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |                  $difference(v3, v2))) |  ~ (in(v3, v0) = 0)))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (290) with fresh symbols all_75_0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |        all_75_1, all_75_2 gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |   (291)  searchtree(all_75_1) = 0 & searchtree(all_75_2) = 0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_75_0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_75_2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_75_1 & Tree(all_75_1)
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |          & Tree(all_75_2) &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |                all_75_0)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_75_1) = 0)) &  ! [v0:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0, all_75_0))) | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |            ~ (in(v0, all_75_2) = 0))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (291) implies:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |   (292)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_75_1
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |   (293)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_75_2
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | |   (294)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_75_0
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (295)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (295) imply:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (296)  $false
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (296) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (297)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: Tree] :  ? [v3:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |            any] :  ? [v4: int] : (searchtree(v2) = v3 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |            searchtree(all_13_6) = v1 & searchtree(all_13_9) =
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |            v0 & val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v4 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v2 & Tree(v2) & ( ~
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |              (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ! [v5: int] : ( ~
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                  ($lesseq(v5, v4)) |  ~ (in(v5, v2) = 0)) &  !
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                [v5: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v5,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                        v4))) |  ~ (in(v5, all_13_6) = 0)))))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (297) with fresh symbols all_82_0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |        all_82_1, all_82_2, all_82_3, all_82_4 gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (298)  searchtree(all_82_2) = all_82_1 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |          searchtree(all_13_6) = all_82_3 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |          searchtree(all_13_9) = all_82_4 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_82_0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |          Tree(all_82_2) & ( ~ (all_82_4 = 0) | (all_82_1 = 0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |              all_82_3 = 0 &  ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                    all_82_0)) |  ~ (in(v0, all_82_2) = 0)) & 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |              ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(v0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                      all_82_0))) |  ~ (in(v0, all_13_6) =
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |                  0))))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (298) implies:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (299)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_82_2
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | |   (300)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_82_0
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (39) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |   (301)  all_13_9 = empty:Tree
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (255), (301) imply:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |   (302)  $false
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (302) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |   (303)  all_13_4 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ?
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |          [v2: int] :  ? [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |              = 0) &  ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_8) &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |            in(all_13_8, v3) = v4 & in(all_13_8, v1) = v2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | |            Tree(v1))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (303) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (304)  all_13_4 = 0
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (256), (304) imply:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (305)  $false
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (305) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (306)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: Tree] :  ? [v2: int] :  ?
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          [v3: Tree] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v2
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              = 0) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_8) & in(all_13_8, v3) =
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |            v4 & in(all_13_8, v1) = v2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |            val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = v0 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |            left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v1 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |            right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = v3 & Tree(v3) &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |            Tree(v1))
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (306) with fresh symbols all_92_0,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_92_1, all_92_2, all_92_3, all_92_4 gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (307)   ~ (all_92_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_92_2 = 0) &  ~
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          (all_92_4 = all_13_8) & in(all_13_8, all_92_1) =
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          all_92_0 & in(all_13_8, all_92_3) = all_92_2 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_92_4 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_92_3 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_92_1 &
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |          Tree(all_92_1) & Tree(all_92_3)
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (307) implies:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (308)   ~ (all_92_4 = all_13_8)
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (309)   ~ (all_92_2 = 0)
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (310)   ~ (all_92_0 = 0)
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (311)  right:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_92_1
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (312)  left:(Tree)>Tree(all_13_9) = all_92_3
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (313)  val:(Tree)>Int(all_13_9) = all_92_4
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (314)  in(all_13_8, all_92_3) = all_92_2
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (315)  in(all_13_8, all_92_1) = all_92_0
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_13_5, all_63_1,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (24), (280) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (316)  all_63_1 = all_13_5
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_45_0, all_63_1,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (262), (280) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (317)  all_63_1 = all_45_0
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_63_1, all_75_1,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (280), (292) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (318)  all_75_1 = all_63_1
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_75_1, all_82_2,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (292), (299) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (319)  all_82_2 = all_75_1
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_82_2, all_92_1,
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (299), (311) gives:
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | |   (320)  all_92_1 = all_82_2
% 21.69/4.07  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_51_0, all_92_1,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (268), (311) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (321)  all_92_1 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_13_6, all_75_2,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (25), (293) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (322)  all_75_2 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_69_3, all_75_2,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (286), (293) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (323)  all_75_2 = all_69_3
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_63_3, all_75_2,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (281), (293) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (324)  all_75_2 = all_63_3
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_45_1, all_75_2,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (263), (293) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (325)  all_75_2 = all_45_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_75_2, all_92_3,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (293), (312) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (326)  all_92_3 = all_75_2
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_57_0, all_92_3,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (274), (312) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (327)  all_92_3 = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_13_7, all_57_1,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (26), (275) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (328)  all_57_1 = all_13_7
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_57_1, all_69_0,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (275), (287) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (329)  all_69_0 = all_57_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_69_0, all_75_0,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (287), (294) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (330)  all_75_0 = all_69_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_75_0, all_82_0,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (294), (300) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (331)  all_82_0 = all_75_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_82_0, all_92_4,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (300), (313) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (332)  all_92_4 = all_82_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_51_1, all_92_4,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_9, simplifying with (269), (313) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (333)  all_92_4 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (320), (321) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (334)  all_82_2 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (334) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (335)  all_82_2 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (326), (327) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (336)  all_75_2 = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (336) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (337)  all_75_2 = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (332), (333) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (338)  all_82_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (338) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (339)  all_82_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (331), (339) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (340)  all_75_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (340) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (341)  all_75_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (319), (335) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (342)  all_75_1 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (342) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (343)  all_75_1 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (330), (341) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (344)  all_69_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (344) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (345)  all_69_0 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (318), (343) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (346)  all_63_1 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (346) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (347)  all_63_1 = all_51_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (323), (337) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (348)  all_69_3 = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (323), (325) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (349)  all_69_3 = all_45_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (323), (324) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (350)  all_69_3 = all_63_3
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (322), (323) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (351)  all_69_3 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (329), (345) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (352)  all_57_1 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (352) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (353)  all_57_1 = all_51_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (349), (350) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (354)  all_63_3 = all_45_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (350), (351) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (355)  all_63_3 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (348), (350) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (356)  all_63_3 = all_57_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (317), (347) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (357)  all_51_0 = all_45_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (316), (347) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (358)  all_51_0 = all_13_5
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (354), (356) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (359)  all_57_0 = all_45_1
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (355), (356) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (360)  all_57_0 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (359), (360) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (361)  all_45_1 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (328), (353) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (362)  all_51_1 = all_13_7
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (357), (358) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (363)  all_45_0 = all_13_5
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (333), (362) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (364)  all_92_4 = all_13_7
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (327), (360) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (365)  all_92_3 = all_13_6
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (321), (358) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (366)  all_92_1 = all_13_5
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (308), (364) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (367)   ~ (all_13_7 = all_13_8)
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (315), (366) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (368)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = all_92_0
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (314), (365) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | |   (369)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = all_92_2
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (257) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (370)  all_13_7 = all_13_8
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (367), (370) imply:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (371)  $false
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (371) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (372)  ( ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7)))
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |            | (all_13_2 = 0 & all_13_3 = all_13_5 &
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |              in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0)) & ( ~ ($lesseq(1,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |                $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) |
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |            (all_13_0 = 0 & all_13_1 = all_13_6 &
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |              in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0))
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (372) implies:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (373)   ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_7, all_13_8))) |
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |          (all_13_0 = 0 & all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_6) = 0)
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (374)   ~ ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))) |
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |          (all_13_2 = 0 & all_13_3 = all_13_5 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_5) = 0)
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (373) gives:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (375)  $lesseq(all_13_7, all_13_8)
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.08  | | | | | | | | | | | | | STRENGTHEN: (367), (375) imply:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (376)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_13_8, all_13_7))
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (374) gives:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (377)  $lesseq(all_13_8, all_13_7)
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (376), (377) imply:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (378)  $false
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (378) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (379)  all_13_2 = 0 & all_13_3 = all_13_5 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |            all_13_5) = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (379) implies:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (380)  in(all_13_8, all_13_5) = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with 0, all_92_0, all_13_5,
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_8, simplifying with (368), (380) gives:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (381)  all_92_0 = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (310), (381) imply:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (382)  $false
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (382) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (383)  all_13_0 = 0 & all_13_1 = all_13_6 & in(all_13_8,
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |            all_13_6) = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (383) implies:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (384)  in(all_13_8, all_13_6) = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with 0, all_92_2, all_13_6,
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_13_8, simplifying with (369), (384) gives:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (385)  all_92_2 = 0
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (309), (385) imply:
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (386)  $false
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (386) is inconsistent.
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | | 
% 21.69/4.09  | End of split
% 21.69/4.09  | 
% 21.69/4.09  End of proof
% 21.69/4.09  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 21.69/4.09  
% 21.69/4.09  3463ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------