TSTP Solution File: SWW632_2 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : SWW632_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:30:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.89s 1.15s
% Output : Refutation 0.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW632_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 20:36:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % Using integer theory
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_16210_n019.cluster.edu
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.89/1.15 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_16210_n019.cluster.edu
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS derived 36 clauses, backtracked 21 clauses and kept 128 clauses.
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS backtracked 4 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS allocated 6445 KBytes.
% 0.89/1.15 SPASS spent 0:00:00.03 on the problem.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.89/1.15 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_16210_n019.cluster.edu
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 % Here is a proof with depth 3, length 35 :
% 0.89/1.15 17(e)[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(0,skc10)*.
% 0.89/1.15 18[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(0,skc9)*.
% 0.89/1.15 21[0:Inp] || less(0,skc10)* -> .
% 0.89/1.15 25(e)[0:Inp] || -> equal(power(U,0),1)**.
% 0.89/1.15 29(e)[0:Inp] || equal(power(skc12,skc9),skc11)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 37(e)[0:Inp] || -> equal(times(skc11,power(skc13,skc10)),power(skc12,skc9))**.
% 0.89/1.15 80[0:ThA] || -> equal(U,V) less(V,U)* less(U,V)*.
% 0.89/1.15 87[0:ThA] || -> equal(times(1,U),U)**.
% 0.89/1.15 99[0:TOC:21.0] || -> lesseq(skc10,0)*.
% 0.89/1.15 123(e)[0:OCE:18.0,80.1] || -> equal(skc9,0) less(0,skc9)*.
% 0.89/1.15 125[1:Spt:123.0] || -> equal(skc9,0)**.
% 0.89/1.15 127[1:Rew:125.0,29.0] || equal(power(skc12,0),skc11)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 128[1:Rew:125.0,37.0] || -> equal(times(skc11,power(skc13,skc10)),power(skc12,0))**.
% 0.89/1.15 131(e)[1:Rew:25.0,127.0] || equal(skc11,1)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 132(e)[1:Rew:25.0,128.0] || -> equal(times(skc11,power(skc13,skc10)),1)**.
% 0.89/1.15 136(e)[0:OCE:17.0,80.1] || -> equal(skc10,0) less(0,skc10)*.
% 0.89/1.15 138(e)[2:Spt:136.0] || -> equal(skc10,0)**.
% 0.89/1.15 141[2:Rew:138.0,132.0] || -> equal(times(skc11,power(skc13,0)),1)**.
% 0.89/1.15 145[2:Rew:25.0,141.0] || -> equal(times(skc11,1),1)**.
% 0.89/1.15 146[2:ArS:145.0] || -> equal(skc11,1)**.
% 0.89/1.15 147(e)[2:MRR:146.0,131.0] || -> .
% 0.89/1.15 150(e)[2:Spt:147.0,136.0,138.0] || equal(skc10,0)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 151[2:Spt:147.0,136.1] || -> less(0,skc10)*.
% 0.89/1.15 156(e)[2:OCE:99.0,151.0] || -> .
% 0.89/1.15 161(e)[1:Spt:156.0,123.0,125.0] || equal(skc9,0)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 162[1:Spt:156.0,123.1] || -> less(0,skc9)*.
% 0.89/1.15 165(e)[2:Spt:136.0] || -> equal(skc10,0)**.
% 0.89/1.15 168[2:Rew:165.0,37.0] || -> equal(times(skc11,power(skc13,0)),power(skc12,skc9))**.
% 0.89/1.15 172[2:Rew:25.0,168.0] || -> equal(power(skc12,skc9),times(skc11,1))**.
% 0.89/1.15 173[2:ArS:172.0] || -> equal(power(skc12,skc9),times(1,skc11))**.
% 0.89/1.15 174[2:Rew:87.0,173.0] || -> equal(power(skc12,skc9),skc11)**.
% 0.89/1.15 175(e)[2:MRR:174.0,29.0] || -> .
% 0.89/1.15 178(e)[2:Spt:175.0,136.0,165.0] || equal(skc10,0)** -> .
% 0.89/1.15 179[2:Spt:175.0,136.1] || -> less(0,skc10)*.
% 0.89/1.15 184(e)[2:OCE:99.0,179.0] || -> .
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_16210_n019.cluster.edu
% 0.89/1.15
% 0.89/1.15 Formulae used in the proof : fof_uni fof_wP_parameter_fast_exp_imperative fof_true_False fof_power_1 fof_witness fof_bool_inversion
% 0.89/1.17
% 0.89/1.17 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------