TSTP Solution File: SWW626_2 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : SWW626_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:30:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.44s 1.74s
% Output : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW626_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 19:45:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % Using integer theory
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_30104_n021.cluster.edu
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SMT.
% 1.44/1.74 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_30104_n021.cluster.edu
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS derived 509 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 600 clauses.
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS backtracked 1 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS allocated 7515 KBytes.
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 1.44/1.74 0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_30104_n021.cluster.edu
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 20 :
% 1.44/1.74 7[0:Inp] || -> ty(elt1)*.
% 1.44/1.74 21[0:Inp] || -> list_elt(skc17)*.
% 1.44/1.74 22[0:Inp] || -> list_elt(skc16)*.
% 1.44/1.74 23[0:Inp] || -> list_elt(skc15)*.
% 1.44/1.74 24[0:Inp] || -> list_elt(skc14)*.
% 1.44/1.74 27[0:Inp] || -> list_elt(skc12)*.
% 1.44/1.74 57(e)[0:Inp] || list_elt(U) -> uni(t2tb(U))*.
% 1.44/1.74 58(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) -> uni(nil(U))*.
% 1.44/1.74 71(e)[0:Inp] || uni(U) -> equal(t2tb(tb2t(U)),U)**.
% 1.44/1.74 86(e)[0:Inp] || permut(elt1,t2tb(skc17),prefix(elt1,skc13,t2tb(skc12)))* -> .
% 1.44/1.74 91(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) uni(V) -> uni(prefix(U,W,V))*.
% 1.44/1.74 92[0:Inp] || -> permut(elt1,t2tb(skc15),prefix(elt1,div_f(skc13,2),t2tb(skc12)))*.
% 1.44/1.74 113(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) uni(V) -> equal(infix_plpl(U,nil(U),V),V)**.
% 1.44/1.74 114[0:Inp] || -> permut(elt1,t2tb(skc16),prefix(elt1,minus(skc13,div_f(skc13,2)),t2tb(skc14)))*.
% 1.44/1.74 117(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) uni(V) uni(W) -> uni(infix_plpl(U,V,W))*.
% 1.44/1.74 120[0:Inp] || -> permut(elt1,t2tb(skc17),infix_plpl(elt1,infix_plpl(elt1,nil(elt1),t2tb(skc15)),t2tb(skc16)))*.
% 1.44/1.74 172[0:Inp] || -> equal(tb2t(infix_plpl(elt1,prefix(elt1,div_f(skc13,2),t2tb(skc12)),prefix(elt1,minus(skc13,div_f(skc13,2)),t2tb(skc14)))),tb2t(prefix(elt1,skc13,t2tb(skc12))))**.
% 1.44/1.74 176(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) uni(V) uni(W) uni(X) permut(U,V,W)* permut(U,W,X)* -> permut(U,V,X)*.
% 1.44/1.74 209(e)[0:Inp] || ty(U) uni(V) uni(W) uni(X) uni(Y) permut(U,V,X) permut(U,W,Y) -> permut(U,infix_plpl(U,V,W),infix_plpl(U,X,Y))*.
% 1.44/1.74 1013(e)[0:ThR:209,176,172,120,117,114,113,92,91,86,71,58,57,27,24,23,22,21,7] || -> .
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_30104_n021.cluster.edu
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 Formulae used in the proof : fof_list_elt fof_uni fof_wP_parameter_rev_sort fof_tb2t fof_t2tb fof_bridgeL1 fof_cons_proj_1 fof_cons_proj_1_sort fof_prefix fof_append_l_nil fof_infix_plpl_def fof_rev_append fof_div_mult fof_permut_def fof_mem_def
% 1.44/1.74
% 1.44/1.74 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------