TSTP Solution File: SWW624_2 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW624_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:50:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 26.00s 4.37s
% Output   : Proof 66.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW624_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 20:14:31 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.65  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.65  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.65  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.65  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.65  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.65  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.65  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.65                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.65  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.67  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.49  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.17/1.50  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 12.06/2.46  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.01/2.56  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.01/2.57  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 13.01/2.63  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.01/2.64  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 13.01/2.65  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.01/2.67  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.84/2.72  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 13.84/2.73  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.84/2.74  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 26.00/4.37  Prover 0: proved (3693ms)
% 26.00/4.37  
% 26.00/4.37  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.00/4.37  
% 26.00/4.37  Prover 3: stopped
% 26.00/4.37  Prover 2: stopped
% 26.46/4.37  Prover 5: stopped
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 6: stopped
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 26.46/4.38  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 27.56/4.61  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 27.56/4.62  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 27.56/4.65  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 27.56/4.72  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 28.73/4.73  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 30.16/4.96  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.88/4.97  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.88/4.98  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.10/5.00  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.10/5.02  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.37/5.04  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.37/5.06  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.37/5.07  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.37/5.08  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.95/5.11  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 33.41/5.40  Prover 10: gave up
% 33.41/5.40  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 35.15/5.53  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 36.24/5.72  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 36.69/5.73  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 57.18/8.53  Prover 13: gave up
% 57.18/8.54  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 57.18/8.62  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 59.13/8.82  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 59.13/8.84  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 65.53/9.71  Prover 7: Found proof (size 168)
% 65.53/9.71  Prover 7: proved (5336ms)
% 65.53/9.71  Prover 8: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  Prover 1: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  Prover 11: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  Prover 4: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  Prover 19: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  Prover 16: stopped
% 65.53/9.72  
% 65.53/9.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 65.53/9.72  
% 66.34/9.73  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 66.34/9.74  Assumptions after simplification:
% 66.34/9.74  ---------------------------------
% 66.34/9.74  
% 66.34/9.74    (infix_plpl_def)
% 66.34/9.75     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.75    [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v4, v1) = v5) |  ~ (cons(v0, v2, v3) = v4) | 
% 66.34/9.75      ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v6: uni] :
% 66.34/9.75      (infix_plpl(v0, v3, v1) = v6 & cons(v0, v2, v6) = v5 & uni(v6) & uni(v5))) &
% 66.34/9.75     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.75    [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (cons(v0, v2, v4) = v5) | 
% 66.34/9.76      ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v6: uni] :
% 66.34/9.76      (infix_plpl(v0, v6, v1) = v5 & cons(v0, v2, v3) = v6 & uni(v6) & uni(v5))) &
% 66.34/9.76     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : (v3 = v1 |  ~
% 66.34/9.76      (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (nil(v0) = v2) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v1))
% 66.34/9.76  
% 66.34/9.76    (length_def)
% 66.34/9.76     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1,
% 66.34/9.76          v2) = v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v4: int] :
% 66.34/9.76      (length(v0, v3) = v4 & length(v0, v2) = $sum(v4, -1))) &  ! [v0: ty] :  !
% 66.34/9.76    [v1: uni] : ( ~ (nil(v0) = v1) |  ~ ty(v0) | length(v0, v1) = 0)
% 66.34/9.76  
% 66.34/9.76    (length_nonnegative)
% 66.34/9.76     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v2, -1)) |  ~
% 66.34/9.76      (length(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v1))
% 66.34/9.76  
% 66.34/9.76    (nil_sort)
% 66.34/9.76     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: ty] : ( ~ (list(v0) = v1) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ? [v2: uni] :
% 66.34/9.76      (nil(v0) = v2 & uni(v2) & sort(v1, v2))) &  ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] : ( ~
% 66.34/9.76      (nil(v0) = v1) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ? [v2: ty] : (list(v0) = v2 & ty(v2) &
% 66.34/9.76        sort(v2, v1)))
% 66.34/9.76  
% 66.34/9.76    (permut_append_swap)
% 66.34/9.76     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0,
% 66.34/9.76          v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v4: uni] :
% 66.34/9.76      (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) = v4 & uni(v4) & permut(v0, v4, v3))) &  ! [v0: ty]
% 66.34/9.76    :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) =
% 66.34/9.76        v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v4: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0,
% 66.34/9.76          v2, v1) = v4 & uni(v4) & permut(v0, v3, v4)))
% 66.34/9.76  
% 66.34/9.76    (permut_assoc)
% 66.34/9.77     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.77    [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) =
% 66.34/9.77        v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v6: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.77      [v7: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v6 & infix_plpl(v0, v1, v6) = v7 &
% 66.34/9.77        uni(v7) & uni(v6) & permut(v0, v5, v7))) &  ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.77    [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0,
% 66.34/9.77          v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~
% 66.34/9.77      uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ? [v6: uni] :  ? [v7: uni] :
% 66.34/9.77      (infix_plpl(v0, v6, v3) = v7 & infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & uni(v7) &
% 66.34/9.77        uni(v6) & permut(v0, v7, v5)))
% 66.34/9.77  
% 66.34/9.77    (permut_cons)
% 66.34/9.77     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.77    [v5: uni] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (cons(v0, v1, v2) = v4) |  ~
% 66.34/9.77      ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ~ permut(v0, v2, v3) |
% 66.34/9.77      permut(v0, v4, v5))
% 66.34/9.77  
% 66.34/9.77    (permut_prefix)
% 66.34/9.77    ty(elt1) &  ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: elt] :  ? [v4:
% 66.34/9.77      list_elt] :  ? [v5: uni] :  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.77    [v9: uni] :  ? [v10: int] :  ? [v11: uni] : (list_elt(v4) & elt(v3) &
% 66.34/9.77      ((prefix(elt1, v10, v9) = v11 & prefix(elt1, v6, v5) = v7 & t2tb1(v3) = v8 &
% 66.34/9.77          t2tb(v4) = v5 & length(elt1, v9) = v10 & length(elt1, v5) = v6 &
% 66.34/9.77          cons(elt1, v8, v5) = v9 & uni(v11) & uni(v9) & uni(v8) & uni(v7) &
% 66.34/9.77          uni(v5) & permut(elt1, v7, v5) &  ~ permut(elt1, v11, v9)) |
% 66.34/9.77        (prefix(elt1, v1, v0) = v2 & length(elt1, v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0 &
% 66.34/9.77          uni(v2) & uni(v0) &  ~ permut(elt1, v2, v0))))
% 66.34/9.77  
% 66.34/9.77    (prefix_append)
% 66.34/9.77     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: int] :  !
% 66.34/9.77    [v5: uni] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v4, v1)) |  ~ (prefix(v0, $difference(v1, v4), v3) =
% 66.34/9.77        v5) |  ~ (length(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ?
% 66.34/9.77      [v6: int] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ? [v9: uni] :  ? [v10: uni] :
% 66.34/9.77      ((v10 = v8 & prefix(v0, v4, v2) = v9 & prefix(v0, v1, v7) = v8 &
% 66.34/9.77          infix_plpl(v0, v9, v5) = v8 & infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v7 & uni(v9) &
% 66.34/9.77          uni(v8) & uni(v7)) | ($lesseq(1, $sum($difference($product(-1, v6), v4),
% 66.34/9.77              v1)) & length(v0, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2:
% 66.34/9.77      uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ (prefix(v0, v1, v4)
% 66.34/9.77        = v5) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~
% 66.34/9.77      uni(v2) |  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: int] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ? [v9: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.77      [v10: uni] : (length(v0, v2) = v6 & ( ~ ($lesseq(v6, v1)) | (v10 = v5 &
% 66.34/9.77            prefix(v0, $difference(v1, v6), v3) = v9 & prefix(v0, v6, v2) = v8 &
% 66.34/9.77            infix_plpl(v0, v8, v9) = v5 & uni(v9) & uni(v8) & uni(v5)) |
% 66.34/9.77          ($lesseq(1, $sum($difference($product(-1, v7), v6), v1)) & length(v0,
% 66.34/9.77              v3) = v7))))
% 66.34/9.77  
% 66.34/9.77    (prefix_def1)
% 66.34/9.77     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] : ( ~ (prefix(v0, 0, v1) = v2) |  ~
% 66.34/9.77      ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v1) | (nil(v0) = v2 & uni(v2)))
% 66.34/9.77  
% 66.34/9.77    (prefix_def2)
% 66.34/9.78     ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.78    [v5: uni] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, v1)) |  ~ (prefix(v0, $sum(v1, -1), v3) = v4) |  ~
% 66.34/9.78      (cons(v0, v2, v4) = v5) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ? [v6: uni]
% 66.34/9.78      : (prefix(v0, v1, v6) = v5 & cons(v0, v2, v3) = v6 & uni(v6) & uni(v5))) & 
% 66.34/9.78    ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.78    [v5: uni] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, v1)) |  ~ (prefix(v0, v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ (cons(v0,
% 66.34/9.78          v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ? [v6: uni] :
% 66.34/9.78      (prefix(v0, $sum(v1, -1), v3) = v6 & cons(v0, v2, v6) = v5 & uni(v6) &
% 66.34/9.78        uni(v5)))
% 66.34/9.78  
% 66.34/9.78    (sorted_Nil)
% 66.34/9.78    ty(elt1) &  ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: list_elt] : (tb2t(v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0
% 66.34/9.78      & list_elt(v1) & uni(v0) & sorted(v1))
% 66.34/9.78  
% 66.34/9.78    (sorted_One)
% 66.34/9.78    ty(elt1) &  ? [v0: uni] : (nil(elt1) = v0 & uni(v0) &  ! [v1: elt] :  ! [v2:
% 66.34/9.78        uni] : ( ~ (t2tb1(v1) = v2) |  ~ elt(v1) |  ? [v3: uni] :  ? [v4:
% 66.34/9.78          list_elt] : (tb2t(v3) = v4 & cons(elt1, v2, v0) = v3 & list_elt(v4) &
% 66.34/9.78          uni(v3) & sorted(v4))))
% 66.34/9.78  
% 66.34/9.78    (sorted_inversion)
% 66.34/9.78    ty(elt1) &  ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: list_elt] : (tb2t(v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0
% 66.34/9.78      & list_elt(v1) & uni(v0) &  ! [v2: list_elt] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ list_elt(v2) | 
% 66.34/9.78        ~ sorted(v2) |  ? [v3: elt] :  ? [v4: elt] :  ? [v5: list_elt] :  ? [v6:
% 66.34/9.78          uni] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ? [v9: list_elt] :  ? [v10: uni] :
% 66.34/9.78         ? [v11: uni] :  ? [v12: list_elt] :  ? [v13: elt] :  ? [v14: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.78        [v15: uni] :  ? [v16: list_elt] : (list_elt(v5) & elt(v13) & elt(v4) &
% 66.34/9.78          elt(v3) & ((v16 = v2 & t2tb1(v13) = v14 & tb2t(v15) = v2 & cons(elt1,
% 66.34/9.78                v14, v0) = v15 & uni(v15) & uni(v14)) | (v12 = v2 & t2tb1(v4) = v6
% 66.34/9.78              & t2tb1(v3) = v10 & tb2t(v11) = v2 & tb2t(v8) = v9 & t2tb(v5) = v7 &
% 66.34/9.78              cons(elt1, v10, v8) = v11 & cons(elt1, v6, v7) = v8 & list_elt(v9) &
% 66.34/9.78              uni(v11) & uni(v10) & uni(v8) & uni(v7) & uni(v6) & sorted(v9) &
% 66.34/9.78              le(v3, v4))))))
% 66.34/9.78  
% 66.34/9.78    (t2tb_sort)
% 66.34/9.78    ty(elt1) &  ? [v0: ty] : (list(elt1) = v0 & ty(v0) &  ! [v1: list_elt] :  !
% 66.34/9.78      [v2: uni] : ( ~ (t2tb(v1) = v2) |  ~ list_elt(v1) | sort(v0, v2)))
% 66.34/9.78  
% 66.34/9.78    (function-axioms)
% 66.34/9.79     ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v5: ty] :  ! [v6: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (match_list(v6, v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |
% 66.34/9.79       ~ (match_list(v6, v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: bool] :  ! [v5: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (match_bool(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (match_bool(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 66.34/9.79    ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4: ty] : (v1 =
% 66.34/9.79      v0 |  ~ (prefix(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (prefix(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 66.34/9.79      uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: ty] : (v1 = v0 |
% 66.34/9.79       ~ (rev_append(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rev_append(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: ty] : (v1 =
% 66.34/9.79      v0 |  ~ (num_occ(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (num_occ(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: ty] : (v1 =
% 66.34/9.79      v0 |  ~ (infix_plpl(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 66.34/9.79    ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: ty] : (v1 =
% 66.34/9.79      v0 |  ~ (cons(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cons(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: int]
% 66.34/9.79    :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (div(v3, v2) =
% 66.34/9.79        v1) |  ~ (div(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: int]
% 66.34/9.79    :  ! [v3: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (mod(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (mod(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 66.34/9.79    ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (reverse(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (reverse(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1:
% 66.34/9.79      int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (length(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (length(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v3: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cons_proj_2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cons_proj_2(v3, v2)
% 66.34/9.79        = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: ty] : (v1 =
% 66.34/9.79      v0 |  ~ (cons_proj_1(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cons_proj_1(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (abs(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (abs(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: elt] :  ! [v1: elt] :  ! [v2: uni] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (tb2t1(v2) = v1) |  ~ (tb2t1(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v2: elt] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (t2tb1(v2) = v1) |  ~ (t2tb1(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 66.34/9.79      list_elt] :  ! [v1: list_elt] :  ! [v2: uni] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tb2t(v2) = v1)
% 66.34/9.79      |  ~ (tb2t(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: list_elt] :
% 66.34/9.79    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (t2tb(v2) = v1) |  ~ (t2tb(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1:
% 66.34/9.79      ty] :  ! [v2: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (list(v2) = v1) |  ~ (list(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 66.34/9.79    [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (nil(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (nil(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 66.34/9.79      (witness(v2) = v1) |  ~ (witness(v2) = v0))
% 66.34/9.79  
% 66.34/9.79  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 66.34/9.79  --------------------------------------------
% 66.34/9.79  abs_def, abs_le, abs_pos, append_Num_Occ, append_assoc, append_l_nil,
% 66.34/9.79  append_length, bool_inversion, bridgeL, bridgeL1, bridgeR, bridgeR1,
% 66.34/9.79  compatOrderMult, cons_proj_1_def, cons_proj_1_sort, cons_proj_2_def,
% 66.34/9.79  cons_proj_2_sort, cons_sort, div_1, div_bound, div_inf, div_mod, div_mult,
% 66.34/9.79  div_sign_neg, div_sign_pos, infix_plpl_sort, length_nil, list_inversion,
% 66.34/9.79  match_bool_False, match_bool_True, match_bool_sort, match_list_Cons,
% 66.34/9.79  match_list_Nil, match_list_sort, mem_Num_Occ, mem_append, mem_decomp, mem_def,
% 66.34/9.79  mod_1, mod_bound, mod_inf, mod_mult, mod_sign_neg, mod_sign_pos, nil_Cons,
% 66.34/9.79  num_occ_def, permut_append, permut_cons_append, permut_def, permut_length,
% 66.34/9.79  permut_mem, permut_refl, permut_swap, permut_sym, permut_trans, prefix_length,
% 66.34/9.79  prefix_sort, refl, rev_append_append_l, rev_append_append_r, rev_append_def,
% 66.34/9.79  rev_append_def1, rev_append_length, rev_append_sort, reverse_append,
% 66.34/9.79  reverse_cons, reverse_def, reverse_length, reverse_mem, reverse_num_occ,
% 66.34/9.79  reverse_reverse, reverse_sort, rounds_toward_zero, sorted_Two, sorted_append,
% 66.34/9.79  sorted_mem, sorted_rev_append, sorted_reverse_cons, sorted_reverse_cons2,
% 66.34/9.79  sorted_reverse_mem, t2tb_sort1, total, trans, true_False, tuple0_inversion,
% 66.34/9.79  witness_sort
% 66.34/9.79  
% 66.34/9.79  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 66.34/9.79  ---------------------------------
% 66.34/9.79  
% 66.34/9.79  Begin of proof
% 66.34/9.79  | 
% 66.34/9.79  | ALPHA: (nil_sort) implies:
% 66.34/9.79  |   (1)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: ty] : ( ~ (list(v0) = v1) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 66.34/9.79  |            uni] : (nil(v0) = v2 & uni(v2) & sort(v1, v2)))
% 66.34/9.79  | 
% 66.34/9.79  | ALPHA: (length_def) implies:
% 66.34/9.79  |   (2)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] : ( ~ (nil(v0) = v1) |  ~ ty(v0) |
% 66.34/9.79  |          length(v0, v1) = 0)
% 66.34/9.79  |   (3)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~
% 66.34/9.79  |          (cons(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |  ?
% 66.34/9.79  |          [v4: int] : (length(v0, v3) = v4 & length(v0, v2) = $sum(v4, -1)))
% 66.34/9.79  | 
% 66.34/9.79  | ALPHA: (infix_plpl_def) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (4)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : (v3 = v1 | 
% 66.34/9.80  |          ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (nil(v0) = v2) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~
% 66.34/9.80  |          uni(v1))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (permut_assoc) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (5)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni]
% 66.34/9.80  |        :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v0,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1)
% 66.34/9.80  |          |  ? [v6: uni] :  ? [v7: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0, v6, v3) = v7 &
% 66.34/9.80  |            infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & uni(v7) & uni(v6) & permut(v0, v7,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v5)))
% 66.34/9.80  |   (6)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4: uni]
% 66.34/9.80  |        :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ (infix_plpl(v0, v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (infix_plpl(v0,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1)
% 66.34/9.80  |          |  ? [v6: uni] :  ? [v7: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v6 &
% 66.34/9.80  |            infix_plpl(v0, v1, v6) = v7 & uni(v7) & uni(v6) & permut(v0, v5,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v7)))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (permut_append_swap) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (7)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~
% 66.34/9.80  |          (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |
% 66.34/9.80  |           ? [v4: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v1) = v4 & uni(v4) & permut(v0,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v3, v4)))
% 66.34/9.80  |   (8)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] : ( ~
% 66.34/9.80  |          (infix_plpl(v0, v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ~ uni(v1) |
% 66.34/9.80  |           ? [v4: uni] : (infix_plpl(v0, v1, v2) = v4 & uni(v4) & permut(v0,
% 66.34/9.80  |              v4, v3)))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (t2tb_sort) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (9)   ? [v0: ty] : (list(elt1) = v0 & ty(v0) &  ! [v1: list_elt] :  ! [v2:
% 66.34/9.80  |            uni] : ( ~ (t2tb(v1) = v2) |  ~ list_elt(v1) | sort(v0, v2)))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (sorted_Nil) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (10)   ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: list_elt] : (tb2t(v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0 &
% 66.34/9.80  |           list_elt(v1) & uni(v0) & sorted(v1))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (sorted_One) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (11)   ? [v0: uni] : (nil(elt1) = v0 & uni(v0) &  ! [v1: elt] :  ! [v2: uni]
% 66.34/9.80  |           : ( ~ (t2tb1(v1) = v2) |  ~ elt(v1) |  ? [v3: uni] :  ? [v4:
% 66.34/9.80  |               list_elt] : (tb2t(v3) = v4 & cons(elt1, v2, v0) = v3 &
% 66.34/9.80  |               list_elt(v4) & uni(v3) & sorted(v4))))
% 66.34/9.80  | 
% 66.34/9.80  | ALPHA: (sorted_inversion) implies:
% 66.34/9.80  |   (12)   ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: list_elt] : (tb2t(v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0 &
% 66.34/9.80  |           list_elt(v1) & uni(v0) &  ! [v2: list_elt] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 66.34/9.81  |             list_elt(v2) |  ~ sorted(v2) |  ? [v3: elt] :  ? [v4: elt] :  ?
% 66.34/9.81  |             [v5: list_elt] :  ? [v6: uni] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.81  |             [v9: list_elt] :  ? [v10: uni] :  ? [v11: uni] :  ? [v12:
% 66.34/9.81  |               list_elt] :  ? [v13: elt] :  ? [v14: uni] :  ? [v15: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.81  |             [v16: list_elt] : (list_elt(v5) & elt(v13) & elt(v4) & elt(v3) &
% 66.34/9.81  |               ((v16 = v2 & t2tb1(v13) = v14 & tb2t(v15) = v2 & cons(elt1, v14,
% 66.34/9.81  |                     v0) = v15 & uni(v15) & uni(v14)) | (v12 = v2 & t2tb1(v4) =
% 66.34/9.81  |                   v6 & t2tb1(v3) = v10 & tb2t(v11) = v2 & tb2t(v8) = v9 &
% 66.34/9.81  |                   t2tb(v5) = v7 & cons(elt1, v10, v8) = v11 & cons(elt1, v6,
% 66.34/9.81  |                     v7) = v8 & list_elt(v9) & uni(v11) & uni(v10) & uni(v8) &
% 66.34/9.81  |                   uni(v7) & uni(v6) & sorted(v9) & le(v3, v4))))))
% 66.34/9.81  | 
% 66.34/9.81  | ALPHA: (prefix_def2) implies:
% 66.34/9.81  |   (13)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4:
% 66.34/9.81  |           uni] :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ ($lesseq(1, v1)) |  ~ (prefix(v0, v1, v4)
% 66.34/9.81  |             = v5) |  ~ (cons(v0, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~
% 66.34/9.81  |           uni(v2) |  ? [v6: uni] : (prefix(v0, $sum(v1, -1), v3) = v6 &
% 66.34/9.81  |             cons(v0, v2, v6) = v5 & uni(v6) & uni(v5)))
% 66.34/9.81  | 
% 66.34/9.81  | ALPHA: (prefix_append) implies:
% 66.34/9.81  |   (14)   ! [v0: ty] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4:
% 66.34/9.81  |           int] :  ! [v5: uni] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v4, v1)) |  ~ (prefix(v0,
% 66.34/9.81  |               $difference(v1, v4), v3) = v5) |  ~ (length(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~
% 66.34/9.81  |           ty(v0) |  ~ uni(v3) |  ~ uni(v2) |  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ?
% 66.34/9.81  |           [v8: uni] :  ? [v9: uni] :  ? [v10: uni] : ((v10 = v8 & prefix(v0,
% 66.34/9.81  |                 v4, v2) = v9 & prefix(v0, v1, v7) = v8 & infix_plpl(v0, v9,
% 66.34/9.81  |                 v5) = v8 & infix_plpl(v0, v2, v3) = v7 & uni(v9) & uni(v8) &
% 66.34/9.81  |               uni(v7)) | ($lesseq(1, $sum($difference($product(-1, v6), v4),
% 66.34/9.81  |                   v1)) & length(v0, v3) = v6)))
% 66.34/9.81  | 
% 66.34/9.81  | ALPHA: (permut_prefix) implies:
% 66.34/9.81  |   (15)  ty(elt1)
% 66.34/9.81  |   (16)   ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: elt] :  ? [v4:
% 66.34/9.81  |           list_elt] :  ? [v5: uni] :  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: uni] :  ? [v8:
% 66.34/9.81  |           uni] :  ? [v9: uni] :  ? [v10: int] :  ? [v11: uni] : (list_elt(v4)
% 66.34/9.81  |           & elt(v3) & ((prefix(elt1, v10, v9) = v11 & prefix(elt1, v6, v5) =
% 66.74/9.81  |               v7 & t2tb1(v3) = v8 & t2tb(v4) = v5 & length(elt1, v9) = v10 &
% 66.74/9.81  |               length(elt1, v5) = v6 & cons(elt1, v8, v5) = v9 & uni(v11) &
% 66.74/9.81  |               uni(v9) & uni(v8) & uni(v7) & uni(v5) & permut(elt1, v7, v5) & 
% 66.74/9.81  |               ~ permut(elt1, v11, v9)) | (prefix(elt1, v1, v0) = v2 &
% 66.74/9.81  |               length(elt1, v0) = v1 & nil(elt1) = v0 & uni(v2) & uni(v0) &  ~
% 66.74/9.81  |               permut(elt1, v2, v0))))
% 66.74/9.81  | 
% 66.74/9.81  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 66.74/9.81  |   (17)   ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (nil(v2) =
% 66.74/9.81  |             v1) |  ~ (nil(v2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.81  |   (18)   ! [v0: list_elt] :  ! [v1: list_elt] :  ! [v2: uni] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 66.74/9.81  |           (tb2t(v2) = v1) |  ~ (tb2t(v2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.81  |   (19)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: ty] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 66.74/9.81  |           ~ (length(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (length(v3, v2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.81  |   (20)   ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: uni] :  ! [v4:
% 66.74/9.81  |           ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (infix_plpl(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 66.74/9.81  |           (infix_plpl(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.81  |   (21)   ! [v0: uni] :  ! [v1: uni] :  ! [v2: uni] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4:
% 66.74/9.81  |           ty] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (prefix(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (prefix(v4, v3,
% 66.74/9.81  |               v2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.81  | 
% 66.74/9.81  | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbol all_108_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (22)  list(elt1) = all_108_0 & ty(all_108_0) &  ! [v0: list_elt] :  ! [v1:
% 66.74/9.82  |           uni] : ( ~ (t2tb(v0) = v1) |  ~ list_elt(v0) | sort(all_108_0, v1))
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (23)  list(elt1) = all_108_0
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | DELTA: instantiating (10) with fresh symbols all_111_0, all_111_1 gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (24)  tb2t(all_111_1) = all_111_0 & nil(elt1) = all_111_1 &
% 66.74/9.82  |         list_elt(all_111_0) & uni(all_111_1) & sorted(all_111_0)
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (25)  nil(elt1) = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.82  |   (26)  tb2t(all_111_1) = all_111_0
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | DELTA: instantiating (11) with fresh symbol all_118_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (27)  nil(elt1) = all_118_0 & uni(all_118_0) &  ! [v0: elt] :  ! [v1: uni] :
% 66.74/9.82  |         ( ~ (t2tb1(v0) = v1) |  ~ elt(v0) |  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: list_elt] :
% 66.74/9.82  |           (tb2t(v2) = v3 & cons(elt1, v1, all_118_0) = v2 & list_elt(v3) &
% 66.74/9.82  |             uni(v2) & sorted(v3)))
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (28)  nil(elt1) = all_118_0
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | DELTA: instantiating (16) with fresh symbols all_122_0, all_122_1, all_122_2,
% 66.74/9.82  |        all_122_3, all_122_4, all_122_5, all_122_6, all_122_7, all_122_8,
% 66.74/9.82  |        all_122_9, all_122_10, all_122_11 gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (29)  list_elt(all_122_7) & elt(all_122_8) & ((prefix(elt1, all_122_1,
% 66.74/9.82  |               all_122_2) = all_122_0 & prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) =
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_4 & t2tb1(all_122_8) = all_122_3 & t2tb(all_122_7) =
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_6 & length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_122_1 & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.82  |               all_122_6) = all_122_5 & cons(elt1, all_122_3, all_122_6) =
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_2 & uni(all_122_0) & uni(all_122_2) & uni(all_122_3) &
% 66.74/9.82  |             uni(all_122_4) & uni(all_122_6) & permut(elt1, all_122_4,
% 66.74/9.82  |               all_122_6) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_0, all_122_2)) |
% 66.74/9.82  |           (prefix(elt1, all_122_10, all_122_11) = all_122_9 & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.82  |               all_122_11) = all_122_10 & nil(elt1) = all_122_11 &
% 66.74/9.82  |             uni(all_122_9) & uni(all_122_11) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_9,
% 66.74/9.82  |               all_122_11)))
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (30)  (prefix(elt1, all_122_1, all_122_2) = all_122_0 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_122_4 & t2tb1(all_122_8) = all_122_3 &
% 66.74/9.82  |           t2tb(all_122_7) = all_122_6 & length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_122_1 &
% 66.74/9.82  |           length(elt1, all_122_6) = all_122_5 & cons(elt1, all_122_3,
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_6) = all_122_2 & uni(all_122_0) & uni(all_122_2) &
% 66.74/9.82  |           uni(all_122_3) & uni(all_122_4) & uni(all_122_6) & permut(elt1,
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_4, all_122_6) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_0, all_122_2)) |
% 66.74/9.82  |         (prefix(elt1, all_122_10, all_122_11) = all_122_9 & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.82  |             all_122_11) = all_122_10 & nil(elt1) = all_122_11 & uni(all_122_9)
% 66.74/9.82  |           & uni(all_122_11) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_9, all_122_11))
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | DELTA: instantiating (12) with fresh symbols all_124_0, all_124_1 gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (31)  tb2t(all_124_1) = all_124_0 & nil(elt1) = all_124_1 &
% 66.74/9.82  |         list_elt(all_124_0) & uni(all_124_1) &  ! [v0: any] : (v0 = all_124_0
% 66.74/9.82  |           |  ~ list_elt(v0) |  ~ sorted(v0) |  ? [v1: elt] :  ? [v2: elt] :  ?
% 66.74/9.82  |           [v3: list_elt] :  ? [v4: uni] :  ? [v5: uni] :  ? [v6: uni] :  ?
% 66.74/9.82  |           [v7: list_elt] :  ? [v8: uni] :  ? [v9: uni] :  ? [v10: any] :  ?
% 66.74/9.82  |           [v11: elt] :  ? [v12: uni] :  ? [v13: uni] :  ? [v14: any] :
% 66.74/9.82  |           (list_elt(v3) & elt(v11) & elt(v2) & elt(v1) & ((v14 = v0 &
% 66.74/9.82  |                 t2tb1(v11) = v12 & tb2t(v13) = v0 & cons(elt1, v12, all_124_1)
% 66.74/9.82  |                 = v13 & uni(v13) & uni(v12)) | (v10 = v0 & t2tb1(v2) = v4 &
% 66.74/9.82  |                 t2tb1(v1) = v8 & tb2t(v9) = v0 & tb2t(v6) = v7 & t2tb(v3) = v5
% 66.74/9.82  |                 & cons(elt1, v8, v6) = v9 & cons(elt1, v4, v5) = v6 &
% 66.74/9.82  |                 list_elt(v7) & uni(v9) & uni(v8) & uni(v6) & uni(v5) & uni(v4)
% 66.74/9.82  |                 & sorted(v7) & le(v1, v2)))))
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | ALPHA: (31) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (32)  nil(elt1) = all_124_1
% 66.74/9.82  |   (33)  tb2t(all_124_1) = all_124_0
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_118_0, all_124_1, elt1, simplifying
% 66.74/9.82  |              with (28), (32) gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (34)  all_124_1 = all_118_0
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_111_1, all_124_1, elt1, simplifying
% 66.74/9.82  |              with (25), (32) gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (35)  all_124_1 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_111_0, all_124_0, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.82  |              simplifying with (26) gives:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (36)  all_124_0 = all_111_0 |  ~ (tb2t(all_111_1) = all_124_0)
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | COMBINE_EQS: (34), (35) imply:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (37)  all_118_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | SIMP: (37) implies:
% 66.74/9.82  |   (38)  all_118_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.82  | 
% 66.74/9.82  | REDUCE: (33), (35) imply:
% 66.74/9.83  |   (39)  tb2t(all_111_1) = all_124_0
% 66.74/9.83  | 
% 66.74/9.83  | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | 
% 66.74/9.83  | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (40)   ~ (tb2t(all_111_1) = all_124_0)
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | PRED_UNIFY: (39), (40) imply:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (41)  $false
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with elt1, all_111_1, simplifying with (15),
% 66.74/9.83  | |              (25) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (42)  length(elt1, all_111_1) = 0
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with elt1, all_108_0, simplifying with (15),
% 66.74/9.83  | |              (23) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (43)   ? [v0: uni] : (nil(elt1) = v0 & uni(v0) & sort(all_108_0, v0))
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | DELTA: instantiating (43) with fresh symbol all_145_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (44)  nil(elt1) = all_145_0 & uni(all_145_0) & sort(all_108_0, all_145_0)
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (45)  nil(elt1) = all_145_0
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_111_1, all_145_0, elt1, simplifying
% 66.74/9.83  | |              with (25), (45) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | |   (46)  all_145_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | BETA: splitting (30) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (47)  prefix(elt1, all_122_1, all_122_2) = all_122_0 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |           all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_122_4 & t2tb1(all_122_8) = all_122_3
% 66.74/9.83  | | |         & t2tb(all_122_7) = all_122_6 & length(elt1, all_122_2) =
% 66.74/9.83  | | |         all_122_1 & length(elt1, all_122_6) = all_122_5 & cons(elt1,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |           all_122_3, all_122_6) = all_122_2 & uni(all_122_0) &
% 66.74/9.83  | | |         uni(all_122_2) & uni(all_122_3) & uni(all_122_4) & uni(all_122_6)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |         & permut(elt1, all_122_4, all_122_6) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_0,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |           all_122_2)
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | ALPHA: (47) implies:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (48)   ~ permut(elt1, all_122_0, all_122_2)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (49)  permut(elt1, all_122_4, all_122_6)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (50)  uni(all_122_6)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (51)  uni(all_122_3)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (52)  uni(all_122_2)
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (53)  cons(elt1, all_122_3, all_122_6) = all_122_2
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (54)  length(elt1, all_122_6) = all_122_5
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (55)  length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_122_1
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (56)  prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_122_4
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (57)  prefix(elt1, all_122_1, all_122_2) = all_122_0
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with elt1, all_122_3, all_122_6, all_122_2,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              simplifying with (15), (50), (51), (53) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (58)   ? [v0: int] : (length(elt1, all_122_2) = v0 & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |             all_122_6) = $sum(v0, -1))
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (length_nonnegative) with elt1, all_122_6,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              all_122_5, simplifying with (15), (50), (54) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (59)  $lesseq(0, all_122_5)
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (length_nonnegative) with elt1, all_122_2,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              all_122_1, simplifying with (15), (52), (55) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (60)  $lesseq(0, all_122_1)
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with elt1, $product(2, all_122_5),
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              all_122_6, all_122_6, all_122_5, all_122_4, simplifying with
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              (15), (50), (54), (56) gives:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |   (61)   ~ ($lesseq(0, all_122_5)) |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: uni] :  ? [v2:
% 66.74/9.83  | | |           uni] :  ? [v3: uni] :  ? [v4: uni] : ((v4 = v2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |               $product(2, all_122_5), v1) = v2 & prefix(elt1, all_122_5,
% 66.74/9.83  | | |               all_122_6) = v3 & infix_plpl(elt1, v3, all_122_4) = v2 &
% 66.74/9.83  | | |             infix_plpl(elt1, all_122_6, all_122_6) = v1 & uni(v3) &
% 66.74/9.83  | | |             uni(v2) & uni(v1)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_5, v0)) &
% 66.74/9.83  | | |             length(elt1, all_122_6) = v0))
% 66.74/9.83  | | | 
% 66.74/9.83  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with elt1, $sum(all_122_1, all_122_5),
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              all_122_6, all_122_2, all_122_5, all_122_0, simplifying with
% 66.74/9.83  | | |              (15), (50), (52), (54), (57) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | |   (62)   ~ ($lesseq(0, all_122_1)) |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: uni] :  ? [v2:
% 66.74/9.84  | | |           uni] :  ? [v3: uni] :  ? [v4: uni] : ((v4 = v2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | |               $sum(all_122_1, all_122_5), v1) = v2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | |               all_122_5, all_122_6) = v3 & infix_plpl(elt1, v3, all_122_0)
% 66.74/9.84  | | |             = v2 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_122_6, all_122_2) = v1 & uni(v3) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | |             uni(v2) & uni(v1)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_1, v0)) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | |             length(elt1, all_122_2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with elt1, all_122_1, all_122_3,
% 66.74/9.84  | | |              all_122_6, all_122_2, all_122_0, simplifying with (15), (50),
% 66.74/9.84  | | |              (51), (53), (57) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | |   (63)   ~ ($lesseq(1, all_122_1)) |  ? [v0: uni] : (prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | |             $sum(all_122_1, -1), all_122_6) = v0 & cons(elt1, all_122_3,
% 66.74/9.84  | | |             v0) = all_122_0 & uni(v0) & uni(all_122_0))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | DELTA: instantiating (58) with fresh symbol all_249_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | |   (64)  length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_249_0 & length(elt1, all_122_6) =
% 66.74/9.84  | | |         $sum(all_249_0, -1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | ALPHA: (64) implies:
% 66.74/9.84  | | |   (65)  length(elt1, all_122_6) = $sum(all_249_0, -1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | |   (66)  length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_249_0
% 66.74/9.84  | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |   (67)  $lesseq(all_122_5, -1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (59), (67) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |   (68)  $false
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | CLOSE: (68) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |   (69)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: uni] :  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: uni] :  ?
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |         [v4: uni] : ((v4 = v2 & prefix(elt1, $product(2, all_122_5), v1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |             = v2 & prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) = v3 &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |             infix_plpl(elt1, v3, all_122_4) = v2 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |               all_122_6, all_122_6) = v1 & uni(v3) & uni(v2) & uni(v1))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |           | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_5, v0)) & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |               all_122_6) = v0))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (69) with fresh symbols all_294_0, all_294_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |        all_294_2, all_294_3, all_294_4 gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |   (70)  (all_294_0 = all_294_2 & prefix(elt1, $product(2, all_122_5),
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |             all_294_3) = all_294_2 & prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |           = all_294_1 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_294_1, all_122_4) =
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |           all_294_2 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_122_6, all_122_6) = all_294_3
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |           & uni(all_294_1) & uni(all_294_2) & uni(all_294_3)) |
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |         ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_5, all_294_4)) & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | |             all_122_6) = all_294_4)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | BETA: splitting (62) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (71)  $lesseq(all_122_1, -1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (60), (71) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (72)  $false
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | CLOSE: (72) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (73)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: uni] :  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: uni] :  ?
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |         [v4: uni] : ((v4 = v2 & prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |                 all_122_5), v1) = v2 & prefix(elt1, all_122_5,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |               all_122_6) = v3 & infix_plpl(elt1, v3, all_122_0) = v2 &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             infix_plpl(elt1, all_122_6, all_122_2) = v1 & uni(v3) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             uni(v2) & uni(v1)) | ($lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |                 v0)) & length(elt1, all_122_2) = v0))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (73) with fresh symbols all_309_0, all_309_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |        all_309_2, all_309_3, all_309_4 gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (74)  (all_309_0 = all_309_2 & prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |               all_122_5), all_309_3) = all_309_2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_309_1 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             all_309_1, all_122_0) = all_309_2 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             all_122_6, all_122_2) = all_309_3 & uni(all_309_1) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |           uni(all_309_2) & uni(all_309_3)) | ($lesseq(1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             $difference(all_122_1, all_309_4)) & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |             all_122_2) = all_309_4)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_122_5, $sum(all_249_0, -1),
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |              all_122_6, elt1, simplifying with (54), (65) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (75)  $difference(all_249_0, all_122_5) = 1
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_122_1, all_249_0, all_122_2,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |              elt1, simplifying with (55), (66) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (76)  all_249_0 = all_122_1
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (75), (76) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (77)  $difference(all_122_1, all_122_5) = 1
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | SIMP: (77) implies:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (78)  $difference(all_122_1, all_122_5) = 1
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | REDUCE: (55), (78) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | |   (79)  length(elt1, all_122_2) = $sum(all_122_5, 1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | BETA: splitting (63) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (80)  $lesseq(all_122_1, 0)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | REDUCE: (78), (80) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (81)  $lesseq(all_122_5, -1)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | COMBINE_INEQS: (59), (81) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (82)  $false
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | CLOSE: (82) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (83)   ? [v0: uni] : (prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1, -1), all_122_6)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |           = v0 & cons(elt1, all_122_3, v0) = all_122_0 & uni(v0) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |           uni(all_122_0))
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (83) with fresh symbol all_339_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (84)  prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1, -1), all_122_6) = all_339_0 &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |         cons(elt1, all_122_3, all_339_0) = all_122_0 &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |         uni(all_339_0) & uni(all_122_0)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | ALPHA: (84) implies:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (85)  cons(elt1, all_122_3, all_339_0) = all_122_0
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (86)  prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1, -1), all_122_6) = all_339_0
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | REDUCE: (78), (86) imply:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | |   (87)  prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_339_0
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (74) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |   (88)  all_309_0 = all_309_2 & prefix(elt1, $sum(all_122_1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |             all_122_5), all_309_3) = all_309_2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |           all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_309_1 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |           all_309_1, all_122_0) = all_309_2 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |           all_122_6, all_122_2) = all_309_3 & uni(all_309_1) &
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |         uni(all_309_2) & uni(all_309_3)
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (88) implies:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | |   (89)  prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_309_1
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (70) gives:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.84  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (90)  all_294_0 = all_294_2 & prefix(elt1, $product(2,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |             all_122_5), all_294_3) = all_294_2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |           all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_294_1 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |           all_294_1, all_122_4) = all_294_2 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |           all_122_6, all_122_6) = all_294_3 & uni(all_294_1) &
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |         uni(all_294_2) & uni(all_294_3)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (90) implies:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (91)  uni(all_294_1)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (92)  prefix(elt1, all_122_5, all_122_6) = all_294_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_122_4, all_309_1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              all_122_6, all_122_5, elt1, simplifying with (56),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              (89) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (93)  all_309_1 = all_122_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_309_1, all_339_0,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              all_122_6, all_122_5, elt1, simplifying with (87),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              (89) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (94)  all_339_0 = all_309_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_294_1, all_339_0,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              all_122_6, all_122_5, elt1, simplifying with (87),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              (92) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (95)  all_339_0 = all_294_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (94), (95) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (96)  all_309_1 = all_294_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | SIMP: (96) implies:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (97)  all_309_1 = all_294_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (93), (97) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (98)  all_294_1 = all_122_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (95), (98) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (99)  all_339_0 = all_122_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (85), (99) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (100)  cons(elt1, all_122_3, all_122_4) = all_122_0
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (91), (98) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (101)  uni(all_122_4)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (permut_cons) with elt1, all_122_3,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              all_122_4, all_122_6, all_122_0, all_122_2,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (15), (48), (49), (50), (51),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              (53), (100), (101) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (102)  $false
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (102) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (103)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_5, all_294_4)) &
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |          length(elt1, all_122_6) = all_294_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (103) implies:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (104)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_5, all_294_4))
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (105)  length(elt1, all_122_6) = all_294_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with all_122_5, all_294_4,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              all_122_6, elt1, simplifying with (54), (105)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (106)  all_294_4 = all_122_5
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (104), (106) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | |   (107)  $false
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (107) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (108)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_1, all_309_4)) &
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |          length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_309_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (108) implies:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (109)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_122_1, all_309_4))
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (110)  length(elt1, all_122_2) = all_309_4
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (78), (109) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (111)  $lesseq(all_309_4, all_122_5)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with $sum(all_122_5, 1),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |              all_309_4, all_122_2, elt1, simplifying with (79),
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |              (110) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (112)  $difference(all_309_4, all_122_5) = 1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (111), (112) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | |   (113)  $false
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (113) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (114)  prefix(elt1, all_122_10, all_122_11) = all_122_9 & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | |            all_122_11) = all_122_10 & nil(elt1) = all_122_11 &
% 66.74/9.85  | | |          uni(all_122_9) & uni(all_122_11) &  ~ permut(elt1, all_122_9,
% 66.74/9.85  | | |            all_122_11)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | ALPHA: (114) implies:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (115)   ~ permut(elt1, all_122_9, all_122_11)
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (116)  uni(all_122_11)
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (117)  nil(elt1) = all_122_11
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (118)  length(elt1, all_122_11) = all_122_10
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (119)  prefix(elt1, all_122_10, all_122_11) = all_122_9
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_111_1, all_122_11, elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | |              simplifying with (25), (117) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (120)  all_122_11 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with 0, all_122_10, all_111_1, elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | |              simplifying with (42) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (121)  all_122_10 = 0 |  ~ (length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_122_10)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | REDUCE: (119), (120) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (122)  prefix(elt1, all_122_10, all_111_1) = all_122_9
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | REDUCE: (118), (120) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (123)  length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_122_10
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | REDUCE: (116), (120) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (124)  uni(all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | REDUCE: (115), (120) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | |   (125)   ~ permut(elt1, all_122_9, all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | BETA: splitting (121) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |   (126)   ~ (length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_122_10)
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (123), (126) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |   (127)  $false
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | CLOSE: (127) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |   (128)  all_122_10 = 0
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | REDUCE: (122), (128) imply:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |   (129)  prefix(elt1, 0, all_111_1) = all_122_9
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with elt1, 0, all_111_1, all_111_1, 0,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |              all_122_9, simplifying with (15), (42), (124), (129) gives:
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |   (130)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: uni] :  ? [v2: uni] :  ? [v3: uni] :  ?
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |          [v4: uni] : ((v4 = v2 & prefix(elt1, 0, v1) = v2 & prefix(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |                0, all_111_1) = v3 & infix_plpl(elt1, v3, all_122_9) = v2
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |              & infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = v1 & uni(v3) &
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |              uni(v2) & uni(v1)) | ($lesseq(v0, -1) & length(elt1,
% 66.74/9.85  | | | |                all_111_1) = v0))
% 66.74/9.85  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (prefix_def1) with elt1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |              all_122_9, simplifying with (15), (124), (129) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |   (131)  nil(elt1) = all_122_9 & uni(all_122_9)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | ALPHA: (131) implies:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |   (132)  uni(all_122_9)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |   (133)  nil(elt1) = all_122_9
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (130) with fresh symbols all_256_0, all_256_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |        all_256_2, all_256_3, all_256_4 gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |   (134)  (all_256_0 = all_256_2 & prefix(elt1, 0, all_256_3) = all_256_2
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |            & prefix(elt1, 0, all_111_1) = all_256_1 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |              all_256_1, all_122_9) = all_256_2 & infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_256_3 & uni(all_256_1) &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |            uni(all_256_2) & uni(all_256_3)) | ($lesseq(all_256_4, -1) &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | |            length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_256_4)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | BETA: splitting (134) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (135)  all_256_0 = all_256_2 & prefix(elt1, 0, all_256_3) =
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          all_256_2 & prefix(elt1, 0, all_111_1) = all_256_1 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          infix_plpl(elt1, all_256_1, all_122_9) = all_256_2 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_256_3 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          uni(all_256_1) & uni(all_256_2) & uni(all_256_3)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | ALPHA: (135) implies:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (136)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_256_3
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (137)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_256_1, all_122_9) = all_256_2
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (138)  prefix(elt1, 0, all_111_1) = all_256_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_111_1, all_122_9, elt1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              simplifying with (25), (133) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (139)  all_122_9 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_122_9, all_256_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              0, elt1, simplifying with (129), (138) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (140)  all_256_1 = all_122_9
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (139), (140) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (141)  all_256_1 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | REDUCE: (137), (139), (141) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (142)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_256_2
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | REDUCE: (125), (139) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (143)   ~ permut(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_256_3, all_256_2, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_111_1, elt1, simplifying with (136), (142) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (144)  all_256_2 = all_256_3
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, all_111_1, simplifying with (15),
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              (124) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (145)   ~ (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_111_1) |  ?
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, v0) =
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            v1 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = v0 & uni(v1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            & uni(v0) & permut(elt1, all_111_1, v1))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, all_111_1, simplifying with (15),
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              (124) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (146)   ~ (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_111_1) |  ?
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1, v0, all_111_1) =
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            v1 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = v0 & uni(v1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            & uni(v0) & permut(elt1, v1, all_111_1))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_256_3, simplifying with (15), (25), (124), (136)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (147)  all_256_3 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_256_3, simplifying with (15), (124), (136) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (148)   ? [v0: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = v0 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            uni(v0) & permut(elt1, v0, all_256_3))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |              all_256_3, simplifying with (15), (124), (136) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (149)   ? [v0: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = v0 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |            uni(v0) & permut(elt1, all_256_3, v0))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (149) with fresh symbol all_285_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (150)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_285_0 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          uni(all_285_0) & permut(elt1, all_256_3, all_285_0)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | ALPHA: (150) implies:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (151)  permut(elt1, all_256_3, all_285_0)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (152)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_285_0
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (148) with fresh symbol all_289_0 gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (153)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_289_0 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |          uni(all_289_0) & permut(elt1, all_289_0, all_256_3)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | ALPHA: (153) implies:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (154)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_289_0
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | REDUCE: (136), (147) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (155)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | REDUCE: (147), (151) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | |   (156)  permut(elt1, all_111_1, all_285_0)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | BETA: splitting (146) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |   (157)   ~ (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (155), (157) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |   (158)  $false
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | CLOSE: (158) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |   (159)   ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1, v0,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |              all_111_1) = v1 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |              all_111_1) = v0 & uni(v1) & uni(v0) & permut(elt1, v1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |              all_111_1))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (159) with fresh symbols all_302_0, all_302_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |        gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |   (160)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_302_1, all_111_1) = all_302_0 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |          infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_302_1 &
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |          uni(all_302_0) & uni(all_302_1) & permut(elt1, all_302_0,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |            all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | ALPHA: (160) implies:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | |   (161)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_302_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (145) gives:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |   (162)   ~ (infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (155), (162) imply:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |   (163)  $false
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (163) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |   (164)   ? [v0: uni] :  ? [v1: uni] : (infix_plpl(elt1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, v0) = v1 & infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |              all_111_1) = v0 & uni(v1) & uni(v0) & permut(elt1,
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, v1))
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (164) with fresh symbols all_307_0, all_307_1
% 66.74/9.86  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (165)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_307_1) = all_307_0 &
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |          infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_307_1 &
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |          uni(all_307_0) & uni(all_307_1) & permut(elt1, all_111_1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |            all_307_0)
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (165) implies:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (166)  infix_plpl(elt1, all_111_1, all_111_1) = all_307_1
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (143), (156) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (167)   ~ (all_285_0 = all_111_1)
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_289_0, all_302_1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, elt1, simplifying with (154),
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              (161) gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (168)  all_302_1 = all_289_0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_285_0, all_302_1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, elt1, simplifying with (152),
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              (161) gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (169)  all_302_1 = all_285_0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_289_0, all_307_1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, elt1, simplifying with (154),
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              (166) gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (170)  all_307_1 = all_289_0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (20) with all_111_1, all_307_1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              all_111_1, all_111_1, elt1, simplifying with (155),
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |              (166) gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (171)  all_307_1 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (170), (171) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (172)  all_289_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | SIMP: (172) implies:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (173)  all_289_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (168), (169) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (174)  all_289_0 = all_285_0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | SIMP: (174) implies:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (175)  all_289_0 = all_285_0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (173), (175) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (176)  all_285_0 = all_111_1
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (167), (176) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | |   (177)  $false
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (177) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | Case 2:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |   (178)  $lesseq(all_256_4, -1) & length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_256_4
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | ALPHA: (178) implies:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |   (179)  $lesseq(all_256_4, -1)
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |   (180)  length(elt1, all_111_1) = all_256_4
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (19) with 0, all_256_4, all_111_1, elt1,
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |              simplifying with (42), (180) gives:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |   (181)  all_256_4 = 0
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | REDUCE: (179), (181) imply:
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | |   (182)  $false
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | CLOSE: (182) is inconsistent.
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | | 
% 66.74/9.87  | End of split
% 66.74/9.87  | 
% 66.74/9.87  End of proof
% 66.74/9.87  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 66.74/9.87  
% 66.74/9.87  9214ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------