TSTP Solution File: SWW478+2 by Twee---2.5.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.5.0
% Problem  : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:27:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 26.66s 3.75s
% Output   : Proof 27.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.06/0.10  % Command  : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 08:51:53 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 26.66/3.75  Command-line arguments: --random-mode --random-mode-goal-directed --no-flatten-goal --no-connectedness --no-ground-joining
% 26.66/3.75  
% 26.66/3.75  % SZS status Theorem
% 26.66/3.75  
% 27.35/3.77  % SZS output start Proof
% 27.35/3.77  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 27.35/3.78    fof(conj_0, conjecture, hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, hAPP_val_option_val(some_val, v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))).
% 27.35/3.78    fof(fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J, axiom, hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, hAPP_val_option_val(some_val, v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))).
% 27.35/3.78  
% 27.35/3.78  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 27.35/3.78  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 27.35/3.78  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 27.35/3.78    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 27.35/3.78    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 27.35/3.78  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 27.35/3.78  variables of u and v.
% 27.35/3.78  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 27.35/3.78  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 27.35/3.78  
% 27.35/3.78  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 27.35/3.78  
% 27.35/3.78  Axiom 1 (fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J): hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, hAPP_val_option_val(some_val, v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p))) = true2.
% 27.35/3.78  
% 27.35/3.78  Goal 1 (conj_0): hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, hAPP_val_option_val(some_val, v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p))) = true2.
% 27.35/3.78  Proof:
% 27.35/3.78    hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, hAPP_val_option_val(some_val, v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))
% 27.35/3.78  = { by axiom 1 (fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J) }
% 27.35/3.78    true2
% 27.35/3.78  % SZS output end Proof
% 27.35/3.78  
% 27.35/3.78  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------