TSTP Solution File: SWW478+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SWW478+2 : TPTP v5.3.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art10.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2005MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 4 01:28:07 EST 2011
% Result : Theorem 45.59s
% Output : Solution 45.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4838/SWW478+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 0.15s, total lost is 0.15s
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4838/SWW478+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4838/SWW478+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.4/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 5010
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 734 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 5115 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 5123 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 4433 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 4443 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 3990 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 3609 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 3244 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 456 unused term cells.
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GUSMNSSLM32LD
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreqconjmax>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GUSMNSSLM32LD
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Scanning for AC axioms
% # map_ad325961431ar_val is associative
% # map_ad1185064968ar_val is associative
% # map_ad61982421on_val is associative
% # map_add_list_char_ty is associative
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 3647 unused term cells.
% # Presaturation interreduction done
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms : 805
% # Removed by relevancy pruning : 0
% # Initial clauses : 1107
% # Removed in clause preprocessing : 49
% # Initial clauses in saturation : 1058
% # Processed clauses : 42
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 9
% # ...remaining for further processing: 32
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 0
% # Generated clauses : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 0
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 32
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 19
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 11
% # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1016
% # ...number of literals in the above : 2112
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index : 80 leaves, 1.02+/-0.156 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index : 20 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index : 68 leaves, 1.03+/-0.169 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J)).
% fof(805, conjecture,hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', conj_0)).
% fof(806, negated_conjecture,~(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[805])).
% fof(887, negated_conjecture,~(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[806,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(888,plain,(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(3594,negated_conjecture,(~hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[887])).
% cnf(3595,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[888,3594,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3596,plain,($false),3595,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.43 CPU 0.54 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.43 CPU 0.54 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4838/SWW478+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------