TSTP Solution File: SWW478+2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:25:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.88s 1.05s
% Output : Refutation 0.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 3 ( 0 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(41,axiom,
hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J) ).
cnf(1013,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
cnf(1014,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1013,41]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 01:16:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.50 *
% 0.22/0.50 *
% 0.22/0.51 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51 *
% 0.22/0.51 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51 *
% 0.22/0.51 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51 *
% 0.22/0.51 "."
% 0.22/0.51 *
% 0.22/0.51 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T01:16:39
% 0.22/0.51 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-06T01:16:39
% 0.52/0.72
% 0.52/0.72 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|map_ad1185064968ar_val| ?X (|map_ad1185064968ar_val| ?Y ?Z)) (|map_ad1185064968ar_val| (|map_ad1185064968ar_val| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.52/0.72 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|map_ad61982421on_val| ?X (|map_ad61982421on_val| ?Y ?Z)) (|map_ad61982421on_val| (|map_ad61982421on_val| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.52/0.72 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|map_add_list_char_ty| ?X (|map_add_list_char_ty| ?Y ?Z)) (|map_add_list_char_ty| (|map_add_list_char_ty| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|map_ad325961431ar_val| ?X (|map_ad325961431ar_val| ?Y ?Z)) (|map_ad325961431ar_val| (|map_ad325961431ar_val| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.88/1.05
% 0.88/1.05 #||
% 0.88/1.05 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/1.05 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.88/1.05 ||#
% 0.88/1.05
% 0.88/1.05 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.88/1.05 ; 1189 formulas have been input or derived (from 1 formulas).
% 0.88/1.05 ; 1014 (85%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.88/1.05 ; 92 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.88/1.05 ; 922 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.88/1.05 ;
% 0.88/1.05 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.197 37% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.034 6% Assert (805 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.115 21% Process new row (1,100 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.017 3% Condensing (847 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.060 11% Forward subsumption (847 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.053 10% Backward subsumption (727 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.002 0% Clause clause subsumption (239 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.022 4% Forward simplification (1,100 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.006 1% Backward simplification (967 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.003 1% Ordering (327 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.027 5% Other
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.537 Total
% 0.88/1.05 ; 0.538 Real time
% 0.88/1.05 ;
% 0.88/1.05 ; Term-hash-array has 4,702 terms in all.
% 0.88/1.05 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 682 entries (712 at peak, 727 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 9,792 nodes (10,259 at peak, 10,398 added, 606 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Retrieved 326 possibly forward subsuming rows in 847 calls.
% 0.88/1.05 ; Retrieved 179 possibly backward subsumed rows in 727 calls.
% 0.88/1.05 ; Path-index has 4,665 entries (4,685 at peak, 4,886 added, 221 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Path-index has 24,545 nodes (24,545 at peak, 25,111 added, 566 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Trie-index has 4,665 entries (4,685 at peak, 4,886 added, 221 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Trie-index has 19,514 nodes (19,599 at peak, 20,548 added, 1,034 deleted).
% 0.88/1.05 ; Retrieved 52 generalization terms in 3,536 calls.
% 0.88/1.05 ; Retrieved 414 instance terms in 321 calls.
% 0.88/1.05 ;
% 0.88/1.05 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 40 entries:
% 0.88/1.05 ; 40 with value 0
% 0.88/1.05 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 921 entries:
% 0.88/1.05 ; 5 with value 3 30 with value 35 1 with value 67
% 0.88/1.05 ; 9 with value 4 5 with value 36 3 with value 68
% 0.88/1.05 ; 6 with value 5 4 with value 37 2 with value 69
% 0.88/1.05 ; 36 with value 6 23 with value 38 3 with value 70
% 0.88/1.05 ; 3 with value 7 3 with value 39 4 with value 71
% 0.88/1.05 ; 4 with value 8 2 with value 40 1 with value 72
% 0.88/1.05 ; 20 with value 9 5 with value 41 1 with value 73
% 0.88/1.05 ; 3 with value 10 4 with value 42 1 with value 74
% 0.88/1.05 ; 20 with value 11 4 with value 43 2 with value 75
% 0.88/1.05 ; 21 with value 12 2 with value 44 1 with value 76
% 0.88/1.05 ; 32 with value 13 3 with value 45 1 with value 77
% 0.88/1.05 ; 5 with value 14 2 with value 46 3 with value 78
% 0.88/1.05 ; 24 with value 15 3 with value 47 3 with value 79
% 0.88/1.05 ; 10 with value 16 3 with value 48 1 with value 80
% 0.88/1.05 ; 94 with value 17 2 with value 49 1 with value 81
% 0.88/1.05 ; 24 with value 18 3 with value 50 2 with value 84
% 0.88/1.05 ; 11 with value 19 6 with value 51 5 with value 85
% 0.88/1.05 ; 64 with value 20 5 with value 52 1 with value 86
% 0.88/1.05 ; 19 with value 21 11 with value 53 2 with value 87
% 0.88/1.05 ; 19 with value 22 3 with value 54 1 with value 90
% 0.88/1.05 ; 48 with value 23 10 with value 55 1 with value 91
% 0.88/1.05 ; 34 with value 24 5 with value 56 1 with value 92
% 0.88/1.05 ; 4 with value 25 7 with value 57 5 with value 93
% 0.88/1.05 ; 4 with value 26 2 with value 58 2 with value 98
% 0.88/1.05 ; 4 with value 27 1 with value 59 2 with value 99
% 0.88/1.05 ; 11 with value 28 3 with value 60 2 with value 100
% 0.88/1.05 ; 105 with value 29 1 with value 61 1 with value 103
% 0.88/1.05 ; 14 with value 30 1 with value 62 1 with value 105
% 0.88/1.05 ; 21 with value 31 5 with value 63 2 with value 106
% 0.88/1.05 ; 10 with value 32 2 with value 64 1 with value 109
% 0.88/1.05 ; 11 with value 33 1 with value 65 1 with value 128
% 0.88/1.05 ; 4 with value 34 2 with value 66 1 with value 146
% 0.88/1.05 Evaluation took:
% 0.88/1.05 0.539 seconds of real time
% 0.88/1.05 0.506255 seconds of user run time
% 0.88/1.05 0.033117 seconds of system run time
% 0.88/1.05 [Run times include 0.047 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.88/1.05 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.88/1.05 0 page faults and
% 0.88/1.05 46,165,832 bytes consed.
% 0.88/1.05 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.88/1.05 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T01:16:39
% 0.88/1.05 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.88/1.05 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------