TSTP Solution File: SWW478+2 by E-SAT---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem  : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d SAT

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:14:53 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   23 (  23 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Rn0DlcwdlH/E---3.1_16852.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J,axiom,
    hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Rn0DlcwdlH/E---3.1_16852.p',fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,hAPP_val_option_val(some_val,v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SWW478+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 08:51:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.41/0.59  Running first-order model finding
% 0.41/0.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Rn0DlcwdlH/E---3.1_16852.p
% 0.44/0.67  # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # new_bool_1 with pid 16931 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.67  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.67  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 16935 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.67  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.67  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # Proof found!
% 0.44/0.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 805
% 0.44/0.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 574
% 0.44/0.67  # Initial clauses                      : 345
% 0.44/0.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 25
% 0.44/0.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 320
% 0.44/0.67  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.44/0.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 0.44/0.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.44/0.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.44/0.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.44/0.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 304
% 0.44/0.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 640
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.44/0.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 42947
% 0.44/0.67  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 12285
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.67  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.44/0.67  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Maximum resident set size: 5760 pages
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.67  # User time                : 0.063 s
% 0.44/0.67  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Total time               : 0.075 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Maximum resident set size: 3212 pages
% 0.44/0.67  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.44/0.67  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------