TSTP Solution File: SWW478+1 by Twee---2.5.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.5.0
% Problem : SWW478+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:27:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.72s 0.82s
% Output : Proof 3.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWW478+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 08:29:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.72/0.82 Command-line arguments: --random-mode --random-mode-goal-directed --no-flatten-goal --no-connectedness --no-ground-joining
% 3.72/0.82
% 3.72/0.82 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.72/0.82
% 3.72/0.83 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.72/0.83 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 3.72/0.83 fof(conj_0, conjecture, hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, some_val(v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))).
% 3.72/0.83 fof(fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J, axiom, hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, some_val(v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))).
% 3.72/0.83
% 3.72/0.83 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 3.72/0.83 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 3.72/0.83 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 3.72/0.83 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 3.72/0.83 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 3.72/0.83 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 3.72/0.83 variables of u and v.
% 3.72/0.83 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 3.72/0.83 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 3.72/0.83
% 3.72/0.83 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 3.72/0.83
% 3.72/0.83 Axiom 1 (fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J): hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, some_val(v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p))) = true2.
% 3.72/0.83
% 3.72/0.83 Goal 1 (conj_0): hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, some_val(v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p))) = true2.
% 3.72/0.83 Proof:
% 3.72/0.83 hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val, hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, ea), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, ha), fun_up1149430426on_val(la, v_1, some_val(v))))), hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val, e_a), hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val, h_a), l_a))), red(p)))
% 3.72/0.83 = { by axiom 1 (fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J) }
% 3.72/0.83 true2
% 3.72/0.83 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.72/0.83
% 3.72/0.83 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------