TSTP Solution File: SWW478+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SWW478+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art10.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2005MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec  4 01:27:56 EST 2011

% Result   : Theorem 2.14s
% Output   : Solution 2.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4552/SWW478+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4552/SWW478+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4552/SWW478+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.4/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4666
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 171 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 1289 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 1184 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 1402 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 1121 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 1007 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 961 unused term cells.
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 876 unused term cells.
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GUSMNFSLM31LD
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreq>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GUSMNFSLM31LD
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___042_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Scanning for AC axioms
% # Garbage collection reclaimed 905 unused term cells.
% # Presaturation interreduction done
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 213
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 311
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 21
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 290
% # Processed clauses                  : 7
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 6
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 6
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 1
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 0
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 283
% # ...number of literals in the above : 525
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index :    40 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :     5 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :    35 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J)).
% fof(213, conjecture,hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', conj_0)).
% fof(214, negated_conjecture,~(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[213])).
% fof(233, negated_conjecture,~(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[214,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(234,plain,(hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(979,negated_conjecture,(~hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[233])).
% cnf(980,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[234,979,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(981,plain,($false),980,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.23 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.23 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4552/SWW478+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------