TSTP Solution File: SWW478+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWW478+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:09:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 22 ( 22 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v79P7dTRx2/E---3.1_30653.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J,axiom,
hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v79P7dTRx2/E---3.1_30653.p',fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_InitBlockRed_I1_J]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(member773094996on_val(hAPP_P1886180715on_val(hAPP_P1870962205on_val(produc1441475159on_val,hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,ea),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,ha),fun_up1149430426on_val(la,v_1,some_val(v))))),hAPP_P604205461on_val(hAPP_e1659493427on_val(produc1259058957on_val,e_a),hAPP_f1727192346on_val(hAPP_f1849790461on_val(produc899768717on_val,h_a),l_a))),red(p))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : SWW478+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:47:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v79P7dTRx2/E---3.1_30653.p
% 0.18/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 30732 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # partial match(1): FGUSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 75s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 30736 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # partial match(1): FGUSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 213
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 93
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses : 186
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 166
% 0.18/0.49 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.18/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 163
% 0.18/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 311
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14336
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 3228 pages
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2112 pages
% 0.18/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------