TSTP Solution File: SWW477_10 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWW477_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:26:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : Timeout 300.14s 43.14s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SWW477_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 19:59:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  % (20660)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.38  % (20669)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.39  % (20669)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20667)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20668)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20671)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20672)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20670)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (20673)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 1.28/0.56  Detected minimum model sizes of [3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 1.28/0.56  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,max,max,max,2,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max]
% 1.28/0.56  TRYING [3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 1.28/0.58  TRYING [3,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 1.28/0.60  TRYING [3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 1.92/0.64  TRYING [3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 1.92/0.67  Detected minimum model sizes of [3]
% 1.92/0.67  Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 2.39/0.70  TRYING [3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1]
% 2.39/0.74  TRYING [3]
% 2.39/0.76  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1]
% 3.40/0.84  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,3,1,1,1,1,1]
% 3.40/0.92  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,4,1,1,1,1,1]
% 4.47/1.01  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,2,1,4,1,1,1,1,1]
% 5.40/1.15  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,3,1,4,1,1,1,1,1]
% 7.50/1.43  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,3,1,5,1,1,1,1,1]
% 8.59/1.65  Detected minimum model sizes of [3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 8.59/1.65  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max]
% 8.59/1.66  TRYING [3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 9.37/1.69  TRYING [3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1]
% 9.37/1.72  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,4,1,5,1,1,1,1,1]
% 9.82/1.77  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,1,1,1,1]
% 11.94/2.08  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,4,1,4,1,1,1,1,1]
% 15.53/2.57  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,4,1,6,1,1,1,1,1]
% 17.92/2.90  TRYING [4]
% 18.05/2.96  TRYING [3,1,1,4,1,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,1,1,1,1]
% 21.46/3.44  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,4,1,7,1,1,1,1,1]
% 27.26/4.29  TRYING [3,1,1,5,1,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,1,1,1,1]
% 27.92/4.38  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,4,1,8,1,1,1,1,1]
% 35.35/5.42  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,5,1,8,1,1,1,1,1]
% 55.46/8.27  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,6,1,8,1,1,1,1,1]
% 62.79/9.30  TRYING [3,1,1,6,1,1,6,1,6,1,6,1,1,1,1,1]
% 91.77/13.49  TRYING [5]
% 122.20/17.76  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,6,1,9,1,1,1,1,1]
% 217.97/31.47  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,6,1,10,1,1,1,1,1]
% 218.69/31.60  TRYING [3,1,1,6,1,1,6,1,7,1,7,1,1,1,1,1]
% 284.25/40.93  TRYING [3,1,1,3,1,1,3,1,6,1,11,1,1,1,1,1]
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.14  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.14/43.15  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------