TSTP Solution File: SWW473^1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SWW473^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:12:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.80s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  127 (  12   ~;   8   |;   3   &; 102   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    x_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    pname: $tType ).

thf(decl_51,type,
    ord_less_eq_a_o: ( x_a > $o ) > ( x_a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_94,type,
    image_pname_a: ( pname > x_a ) > ( pname > $o ) > x_a > $o ).

thf(decl_111,type,
    insert_a: x_a > ( x_a > $o ) > x_a > $o ).

thf(decl_117,type,
    member_a: x_a > ( x_a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_118,type,
    member_pname: pname > ( pname > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_120,type,
    g: x_a > $o ).

thf(decl_122,type,
    u: pname > $o ).

thf(decl_123,type,
    mgt_call: pname > x_a ).

thf(decl_125,type,
    pn: pname ).

thf(conj_6,conjecture,
    ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ ( mgt_call @ pn ) @ g ) @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p',conj_6) ).

thf(fact_274_insert__subset,axiom,
    ! [X557: x_a,X558: x_a > $o,X559: x_a > $o] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ X557 @ X558 ) @ X559 )
    <=> ( ( member_a @ X557 @ X559 )
        & ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ X558 @ X559 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p',fact_274_insert__subset) ).

thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
    ord_less_eq_a_o @ g @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p',conj_1) ).

thf(fact_261_imageI,axiom,
    ! [X521: pname > x_a,X522: pname,X523: pname > $o] :
      ( ( member_pname @ X522 @ X523 )
     => ( member_a @ ( X521 @ X522 ) @ ( image_pname_a @ X521 @ X523 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p',fact_261_imageI) ).

thf(conj_4,hypothesis,
    member_pname @ pn @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p',conj_4) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ ( mgt_call @ pn ) @ g ) @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_6])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ ( mgt_call @ pn ) @ g ) @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1127: x_a,X1128: x_a > $o,X1129: x_a > $o] :
      ( ( ( member_a @ X1127 @ X1129 )
        | ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ X1127 @ X1128 ) @ X1129 ) )
      & ( ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ X1128 @ X1129 )
        | ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ X1127 @ X1128 ) @ X1129 ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_a @ X1127 @ X1129 )
        | ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ X1128 @ X1129 )
        | ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ X1127 @ X1128 ) @ X1129 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_274_insert__subset])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ ( mgt_call @ pn ) @ g ) @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X83: x_a,X2: x_a > $o,X1: x_a > $o] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ ( insert_a @ X83 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( member_a @ X83 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_a_o @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ord_less_eq_a_o @ g @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1173: pname > x_a,X1174: pname,X1175: pname > $o] :
      ( ~ ( member_pname @ X1174 @ X1175 )
      | ( member_a @ ( X1173 @ X1174 ) @ ( image_pname_a @ X1173 @ X1175 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_261_imageI])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( member_a @ ( mgt_call @ pn ) @ ( image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X87: pname,X21: pname > x_a,X5: pname > $o] :
      ( ( member_a @ ( X21 @ X87 ) @ ( image_pname_a @ X21 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( member_pname @ X87 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    member_pname @ pn @ u,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWW473^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 07:44:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.55  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nJEbbhHPHh/E---3.1_12247.p
% 0.80/0.63  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.80/0.63  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.80/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting ehoh_best7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_bool_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_ho_11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # pre_casc_6 with pid 12332 completed with status 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Result found by pre_casc_6
% 0.80/0.63  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.80/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.80/0.63  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-MHSFFSBN
% 0.80/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_ho_9 with 975s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_ho_4 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting pre_casc_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting additional_ho_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting additional_ho_7 with 72s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # pre_casc_6 with pid 12339 completed with status 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Result found by pre_casc_6
% 0.80/0.63  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.80/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.80/0.63  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-MHSFFSBN
% 0.80/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_ho_9 with 975s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting new_ho_4 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Starting pre_casc_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/0.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.80/0.63  
% 0.80/0.63  # Proof found!
% 0.80/0.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.80/0.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/0.63  # Parsed axioms                        : 414
% 0.80/0.63  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 229
% 0.80/0.63  # Initial clauses                      : 287
% 0.80/0.63  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.80/0.63  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 282
% 0.80/0.63  # Processed clauses                    : 303
% 0.80/0.63  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.80/0.63  # ...subsumed                          : 46
% 0.80/0.63  # ...remaining for further processing  : 251
% 0.80/0.63  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 92
% 0.80/0.63  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.80/0.63  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Generated clauses                    : 1088
% 0.80/0.63  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 821
% 0.80/0.63  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Paramodulations                      : 843
% 0.80/0.63  # Factorizations                       : 12
% 0.80/0.63  # NegExts                              : 5
% 0.80/0.63  # Equation resolutions                 : 96
% 0.80/0.63  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Total rewrite steps                  : 185
% 0.80/0.63  # ...of those cached                   : 107
% 0.80/0.63  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.80/0.63  # Current number of processed clauses  : 213
% 0.80/0.63  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.80/0.63  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.80/0.63  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.80/0.63  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 163
% 0.80/0.63  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 798
% 0.80/0.63  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2184
% 0.80/0.63  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.80/0.63  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4558
% 0.80/0.63  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4226
% 0.80/0.63  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 41
% 0.80/0.63  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 544
% 0.80/0.63  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 44
% 0.80/0.63  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.80/0.63  # Condensation attempts                : 303
% 0.80/0.63  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.80/0.63  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 32436
% 0.80/0.63  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7064
% 0.80/0.63  
% 0.80/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/0.63  # User time                : 0.047 s
% 0.80/0.63  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.80/0.63  # Total time               : 0.059 s
% 0.80/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 3980 pages
% 0.80/0.63  
% 0.80/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/0.63  # User time                : 0.207 s
% 0.80/0.63  # System time              : 0.033 s
% 0.80/0.63  # Total time               : 0.241 s
% 0.80/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 2636 pages
% 0.80/0.63  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.80/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------