TSTP Solution File: SWW472_10 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWW472_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 11:39:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Timeout 291.55s 41.91s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SWW472_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 19:36:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.37  % (31663)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.39  % (31666)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.40  % (31667)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31665)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31664)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31668)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31669)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31670)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (31666)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.23/0.51  TRYING [1]
% 0.23/0.52  TRYING [2]
% 0.23/0.54  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.23/0.54  Detected maximum model sizes of [2,max,max,max,max,max]
% 0.23/0.54  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.23/0.54  TRYING [1,1,1,1,2,1]
% 0.23/0.55  TRYING [1,1,1,1,3,1]
% 0.23/0.55  TRYING [1,1,1,2,3,1]
% 1.41/0.56  TRYING [1,1,1,3,3,1]
% 1.41/0.57  TRYING [1,1,2,3,3,1]
% 1.56/0.62  TRYING [1,2,2,3,3,1]
% 2.05/0.65  TRYING [3]
% 2.05/0.68  TRYING [2,2,2,3,3,1]
% 2.50/0.75  TRYING [2,2,3,3,3,1]
% 3.41/0.85  TRYING [2,3,3,3,3,1]
% 4.15/0.98  TRYING [2,3,4,3,3,1]
% 5.60/1.19  TRYING [2,3,5,3,3,1]
% 7.70/1.48  TRYING [4]
% 8.28/1.54  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 8.28/1.54  Detected maximum model sizes of [2,max,max,max,max,max]
% 8.28/1.54  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 8.28/1.54  TRYING [1,1,2,2,2,1]
% 8.28/1.55  TRYING [2,3,6,3,3,1]
% 8.28/1.56  TRYING [1,1,3,3,3,1]
% 8.28/1.61  TRYING [2,2,3,3,3,1]
% 9.32/1.69  TRYING [2,2,4,4,4,1]
% 10.26/1.87  TRYING [2,2,5,5,5,1]
% 12.33/2.12  TRYING [2,3,5,4,3,1]
% 13.07/2.30  TRYING [2,3,5,5,5,1]
% 15.18/2.56  TRYING [2,4,5,4,3,1]
% 16.98/2.78  TRYING [2,4,5,5,5,1]
% 19.21/3.10  TRYING [2,3,6,4,3,1]
% 20.38/3.33  TRYING [2,4,6,5,5,1]
% 23.87/3.80  TRYING [2,4,6,4,3,1]
% 26.69/4.20  TRYING [2,5,6,5,5,1]
% 30.04/4.68  TRYING [2,4,6,3,3,1]
% 33.15/5.15  TRYING [2,5,7,5,5,1]
% 35.27/5.40  TRYING [2,3,7,3,3,1]
% 41.32/6.27  TRYING [2,3,7,4,3,1]
% 43.39/6.54  TRYING [2,5,8,5,5,1]
% 48.62/7.34  TRYING [2,3,6,5,3,1]
% 54.83/8.23  TRYING [2,5,6,3,3,1]
% 58.01/8.65  TRYING [2,5,9,5,5,1]
% 60.85/9.09  TRYING [2,4,7,3,3,1]
% 68.92/10.20  TRYING [2,4,7,4,3,1]
% 73.74/10.88  TRYING [5]
% 77.81/11.46  TRYING [2,4,6,5,3,1]
% 84.73/12.43  TRYING [2,5,9,6,5,1]
% 85.28/12.51  TRYING [2,5,6,4,3,1]
% 92.01/13.50  TRYING [2,3,8,3,3,1]
% 101.38/14.80  TRYING [2,3,7,5,3,1]
% 112.50/16.38  TRYING [2,4,7,5,3,1]
% 113.68/16.57  TRYING [2,6,9,6,5,1]
% 128.57/18.76  TRYING [2,3,8,4,3,1]
% 141.17/20.49  TRYING [2,4,8,3,3,1]
% 150.13/21.78  TRYING [2,6,9,6,6,1]
% 152.76/22.17  TRYING [2,4,8,4,3,1]
% 166.48/24.08  TRYING [2,3,8,5,3,1]
% 178.72/25.88  TRYING [2,6,9,7,7,1]
% 179.23/25.95  TRYING [2,3,7,6,3,1]
% 191.60/27.66  TRYING [2,3,9,3,3,1]
% 204.01/29.44  TRYING [2,5,7,5,3,1]
% 217.12/31.33  TRYING [2,4,8,5,3,1]
% 218.16/31.45  TRYING [2,6,9,8,8,1]
% 233.10/33.59  TRYING [2,4,7,6,3,1]
% 246.78/35.53  TRYING [2,3,9,4,3,1]
% 261.60/37.62  TRYING [2,5,8,3,3,1]
% 275.58/39.66  TRYING [2,4,9,3,3,1]
% 277.25/39.87  TRYING [2,6,9,8,8,2]
% 291.55/41.91  TRYING [2,3,8,6,3,1]
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 300.68/43.19  External time out (SIGXCPU) on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------