TSTP Solution File: SWW469_5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SWW469_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:26:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 11.69s 11.87s
% Output : Proof 11.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWW469_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 20:22:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 11.69/11.87 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 11.69/11.87 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff hoare_531836380gleton (Exists fun S2 => Exists fun T2 => Ne S2 T2)) True
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #131 (by assumption #[]): Eq hoare_531836380gleton True
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #132 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (T : state), Exists fun S => Ne S T)) True
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #134 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Iff hoare_531836380gleton (Exists fun S2 => Exists (Ne S2))) True
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #136 (by clausification #[134]): Or (Eq hoare_531836380gleton False) (Eq (Exists fun S2 => Exists (Ne S2)) True)
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #648 (by clausification #[132]): Eq (∀ (T : state), Exists fun S => Ne S T) False
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #649 (by clausification #[648]): ∀ (a : state), Eq (Not (Exists fun S => Ne S (skS.0 7 a))) True
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #650 (by clausification #[649]): ∀ (a : state), Eq (Exists fun S => Ne S (skS.0 7 a)) False
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #651 (by clausification #[650]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Eq (Ne a (skS.0 7 a_1)) False
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #652 (by clausification #[651]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Eq a (skS.0 7 a_1)
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #655 (by superposition #[652, 652]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Eq a a_1
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3111 (by clausification #[136]): ∀ (a : state), Or (Eq hoare_531836380gleton False) (Eq (Exists (Ne (skS.0 16 a))) True)
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3112 (by clausification #[3111]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Or (Eq hoare_531836380gleton False) (Eq (Ne (skS.0 16 a) (skS.0 17 a a_1)) True)
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3113 (by clausification #[3112]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Or (Eq hoare_531836380gleton False) (Ne (skS.0 16 a) (skS.0 17 a a_1))
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3114 (by forward demodulation #[3113, 131]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Or (Eq True False) (Ne (skS.0 16 a) (skS.0 17 a a_1))
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3115 (by clausification #[3114]): ∀ (a a_1 : state), Ne (skS.0 16 a) (skS.0 17 a a_1)
% 11.69/11.87 Clause #3116 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[3115, 655]): False
% 11.69/11.87 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------