TSTP Solution File: SWW469_10 by E-SAT---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:14:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
hoare_1310879719gleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_10,plain,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ induct_false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
induct_true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_induct__trueI]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 09:40:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.556rCrOMVT/E---3.1_28434.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28526 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 146s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28533 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # No proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 170
% 0.21/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 37
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------