TSTP Solution File: SWW469_1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15
% Problem  : SWW469_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:25:12 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.28s 1.47s
% Output   : Refutation 2.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  18 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  22   ~;   4   |;   2   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0   ^  14   !;   7   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(state_type,type,
    state: $tType ).

thf(hoare_1310879719gleton_type,type,
    hoare_1310879719gleton: $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: state ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: state ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: state ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: state] :
      ~ ! [B: state] : ( B = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: state] :
        ~ ! [B: state] : ( B = A ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ! [A: state] :
        ~ ! [B: state] : ( B = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [A: state] :
        ! [B: state] : ( B = A ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: state] : ( A = sk1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: state] : ( A = sk1 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( hoare_1310879719gleton
  <=> ? [A: state,B: state] : ( A != B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( hoare_1310879719gleton
     => ? [A: state,B: state] : ( A != B ) )
    & ( ? [A: state,B: state] : ( A != B )
     => hoare_1310879719gleton ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( hoare_1310879719gleton
     => ~ ! [A: state,B: state] : ( A = B ) )
    & ( ~ ! [A: state,B: state] : ( A = B )
     => hoare_1310879719gleton ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ~ hoare_1310879719gleton
    | ( sk2 != sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ~ hoare_1310879719gleton ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    hoare_1310879719gleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(22,plain,
    hoare_1310879719gleton,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[17,22]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    sk3 != sk2,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: state] :
      ( ( sk2 != sk1 )
      | ( A != sk3 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11,25]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[26:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[27,11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWW469_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 08:08:55 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.94/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (90ms). 
% 1.17/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.58/1.15  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.58/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.68/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.68/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.68/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 1.68/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.68/1.23  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 1.98/1.31  % [INFO] 	 [Domain constraints] Detected constraint on state 
% 1.98/1.31  % [INFO] 	 [Domain constraints] dom(state) ⊆ {sk1} 
% 2.28/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.28/1.47  % Time passed: 943ms (effective reasoning time: 509ms)
% 2.28/1.47  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.28/1.47  % Axioms used in derivation (2): fact_0_state__not__singleton__def, conj_0
% 2.28/1.47  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 2.28/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 943 ms resp. 509 ms w/o parsing
% 2.57/1.54  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.57/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------