TSTP Solution File: SWW469+5 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:17:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.45s 1.13s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f18,axiom,
( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
<=> ? [X4,X5] : ti(state,X4) != ti(state,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).
fof(f62,axiom,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(f63,conjecture,
! [X5] :
~ ! [X4] : ti(state,X4) = ti(state,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(f64,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X5] :
~ ! [X4] : ti(state,X4) = ti(state,X5),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
<=> ? [X0,X1] : ti(state,X0) != ti(state,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
~ ! [X0] :
~ ! [X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
? [X0] :
! [X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
( ( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
| ! [X0,X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1) )
& ( ? [X0,X1] : ti(state,X0) != ti(state,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
( ( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
| ! [X0,X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] : ti(state,X2) != ti(state,X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f140]) ).
fof(f142,plain,
( ? [X2,X3] : ti(state,X2) != ti(state,X3)
=> ti(state,sK0) != ti(state,sK1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
( ( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
| ! [X0,X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1) )
& ( ti(state,sK0) != ti(state,sK1)
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f141,f142]) ).
fof(f170,plain,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : ti(state,X0) = ti(state,X1)
=> ! [X1] : ti(state,X1) = ti(state,sK11) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f171,plain,
! [X1] : ti(state,X1) = ti(state,sK11),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11])],[f138,f170]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
( ti(state,sK0) != ti(state,sK1)
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f248,plain,
! [X1] : ti(state,X1) = ti(state,sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
( ti(state,sK0) != ti(state,sK1)
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
cnf(c_123,plain,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f247]) ).
cnf(c_124,negated_conjecture,
ti(state,X0) = ti(state,sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f248]) ).
cnf(c_186,plain,
ti(state,sK0) != ti(state,sK1),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_123,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_1531,plain,
ti(state,sK11) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1532,negated_conjecture,
ti(state,X0) = sP0_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_1531]) ).
cnf(c_2652,plain,
sP0_iProver_def != sP0_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_1532]) ).
cnf(c_2653,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_2652]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 05:45:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.45/1.13 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.13 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ iProver source info
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 0.45/1.13 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 0.45/1.13 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Parsing...
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 8 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 clauses 73
% 0.45/1.13 conjectures 1
% 0.45/1.13 EPR 7
% 0.45/1.13 Horn 71
% 0.45/1.13 unary 35
% 0.45/1.13 binary 22
% 0.45/1.13 lits 133
% 0.45/1.13 lits eq 45
% 0.45/1.13 fd_pure 0
% 0.45/1.13 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.45/1.13 fd_cond 0
% 0.45/1.13 fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 0.45/1.13 AC symbols 0
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------
% 0.45/1.13 Current options:
% 0.45/1.13 ------
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.13
% 0.45/1.13
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------