TSTP Solution File: SWW469+5 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   8   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   3 sgn   7   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
    ! [X6] :
      ~ ! [X5] : ti(state,X5) = ti(state,X6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(fact_0_state__not__singleton__def,axiom,
    ( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
  <=> ? [X5,X6] : ti(state,X5) != ti(state,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6] :
        ~ ! [X5] : ti(state,X5) = ti(state,X6),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8] : ti(state,X8) = ti(state,esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ( ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
        | ti(state,esk2_0) != ti(state,esk3_0) )
      & ( ti(state,X9) = ti(state,X10)
        | hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_0_state__not__singleton__def])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ti(state,X1) = ti(state,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ti(state,esk2_0) != ti(state,esk3_0)
    | ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ti(state,X1) = ti(state,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 21:11:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 11
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 5
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 6
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 63
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 53
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.25/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.25/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 37
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 20
% 0.25/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 36
% 0.25/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.25/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.25/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 14
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.25/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 9
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2823
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.42  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2780 pages
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------