TSTP Solution File: SWW469+5 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:45:43 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 3 |; 1 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 1 sgn 7 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_0_state__not__singleton__def,axiom,
( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
<=> ? [X5,X6] : ti(state,X5) != ti(state,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
! [X6] :
~ ! [X5] : ti(state,X5) = ti(state,X6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
<=> ? [X5,X6] : ti(state,X5) != ti(state,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_0_state__not__singleton__def]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X6] :
~ ! [X5] : ti(state,X5) = ti(state,X6),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
| ti(state,esk2_0) != ti(state,esk3_0) )
& ( ti(state,X28) = ti(state,X29)
| hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X25] : ti(state,X25) = ti(state,esk1_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
| ti(state,esk2_0) != ti(state,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
ti(state,X1) = ti(state,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Sat May 18 19:33:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 2839 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2841 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.52
% 0.23/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 63
% 0.23/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 48
% 0.23/0.52 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.23/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.23/0.52 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.23/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.23/0.52 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.23/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.23/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 13
% 0.23/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2564
% 0.23/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 496
% 0.23/0.52
% 0.23/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.52 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.52 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.52 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
% 0.23/0.52
% 0.23/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.52 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.23/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------