TSTP Solution File: SWW469+5 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:07:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 4.70s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 40
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 5 unt; 37 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 5 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 67 ( 28 >; 39 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 9 con; 0-7 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 (; 3 !; 2 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ hBOOL > enum > cl_HOL_Oequal > hAPP > type_definition > ti > sum_sum > node > fun > #nlpp > undefined > member > induct_equal > hoare_509422987triple > hoare_244953527triple > hoare_2037801986triple > hoare_1580379338ep_set > fequal > equal_equal > collect > state > induct_true > induct_false > hoare_1883395792gleton > com > bool > #skF_6 > #skF_9 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_1 > #skF_11 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_12 > #skF_4
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(hAPP,type,
hAPP: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(enum,type,
enum: $i > $o ).
tff(hoare_1580379338ep_set,type,
hoare_1580379338ep_set: $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_6',type,
'#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(induct_false,type,
induct_false: $i ).
tff(type_definition,type,
type_definition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(member,type,
member: $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_9',type,
'#skF_9': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(hoare_1883395792gleton,type,
hoare_1883395792gleton: $i ).
tff(cl_HOL_Oequal,type,
cl_HOL_Oequal: $i > $o ).
tff(sum_sum,type,
sum_sum: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(bool,type,
bool: $i ).
tff(collect,type,
collect: $i > $i ).
tff(equal_equal,type,
equal_equal: $i > $i ).
tff(induct_equal,type,
induct_equal: $i > $i ).
tff(com,type,
com: $i ).
tff(fun,type,
fun: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_10',type,
'#skF_10': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_5',type,
'#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $i ).
tff('#skF_8',type,
'#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(fequal,type,
fequal: $i > $i ).
tff(undefined,type,
undefined: $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i ).
tff('#skF_11',type,
'#skF_11': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_7',type,
'#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(hoare_2037801986triple,type,
hoare_2037801986triple: $i > $i ).
tff(hoare_244953527triple,type,
hoare_244953527triple: $i > $i ).
tff(ti,type,
ti: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(hBOOL,type,
hBOOL: $i > $o ).
tff(hoare_509422987triple,type,
hoare_509422987triple: $i > $i ).
tff(state,type,
state: $i ).
tff(induct_true,type,
induct_true: $i ).
tff(node,type,
node: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_12',type,
'#skF_12': $i ).
tff('#skF_4',type,
'#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_270,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
tff(f_275,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [T] :
~ ! [S] : ( ti(state,S) = ti(state,T) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
tff(f_69,axiom,
( hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton)
<=> ? [S,T] : ( ti(state,S) != ti(state,T) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).
tff(c_154,plain,
hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_270]) ).
tff(c_156,plain,
! [S_160] : ( ti(state,S_160) = ti(state,'#skF_12') ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_275]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
( ( ti(state,'#skF_2') != ti(state,'#skF_1') )
| ~ hBOOL(hoare_1883395792gleton) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).
tff(c_167,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_154,c_156,c_156,c_40]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWW469+5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 19:50:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 4.70/2.20 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.70/2.21
% 4.70/2.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.01/2.23
% 5.01/2.23 Inference rules
% 5.01/2.23 ----------------------
% 5.01/2.23 #Ref : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Sup : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Fact : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Define : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Split : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Chain : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Close : 0
% 5.01/2.23
% 5.01/2.23 Ordering : KBO
% 5.01/2.23
% 5.01/2.23 Simplification rules
% 5.01/2.23 ----------------------
% 5.01/2.23 #Subsume : 73
% 5.01/2.23 #Demod : 13
% 5.01/2.23 #Tautology : 3
% 5.01/2.23 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 5.01/2.23 #BackRed : 0
% 5.01/2.23
% 5.01/2.23 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.01/2.23 #Strategies tried : 1
% 5.01/2.23
% 5.01/2.23 Timing (in seconds)
% 5.01/2.23 ----------------------
% 5.01/2.24 Preprocessing : 0.97
% 5.01/2.24 Parsing : 0.49
% 5.01/2.24 CNF conversion : 0.05
% 5.01/2.24 Main loop : 0.18
% 5.01/2.24 Inferencing : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 Reduction : 0.11
% 5.01/2.24 Demodulation : 0.09
% 5.01/2.24 BG Simplification : 0.04
% 5.01/2.24 Subsumption : 0.05
% 5.01/2.24 Abstraction : 0.02
% 5.01/2.24 MUC search : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 Cooper : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 Total : 1.21
% 5.01/2.24 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 Index Matching : 0.00
% 5.01/2.24 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------