TSTP Solution File: SWW437-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW437-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:17:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.89s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 15 unt; 4 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 16 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 13 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_54,plain,
x3 != x8,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_6) ).
cnf(c_58,plain,
x7 != x16,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_10) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x3),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x12),sep(lseg(x3,x16),sep(lseg(x11,x8),emp)))))))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_27) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(c_78,plain,
sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)))
| X0 = X1
| X0 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',wellformedness_5) ).
cnf(c_570,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x16,x3),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x3,x16),sep(lseg(x3,x12),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x6),emp)))))))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_77]) ).
cnf(c_571,plain,
( x7 = x16
| x16 = x3 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_570,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_572,plain,
x16 = x3,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_571,c_58,c_571]) ).
cnf(c_574,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x16,x12),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x6),emp)))))))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_572,c_570]) ).
cnf(c_575,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x16,x12),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x6),emp)))))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_574,c_77,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_576,plain,
( x7 = x16
| x16 = x12 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_575,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_577,plain,
x16 = x12,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_576,c_58,c_576]) ).
cnf(c_579,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x16,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x6),emp)))))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_577,c_575]) ).
cnf(c_582,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x16,x8),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x6),emp))))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_579,c_77,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_585,plain,
( x7 = x16
| x16 = x8 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_582,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_586,plain,
x16 = x8,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_585,c_58,c_585]) ).
cnf(c_597,plain,
x16 != x16,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_572,c_586]) ).
cnf(c_598,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_597]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : SWW437-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 06:02:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.89/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.89/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 3.89/1.14 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 3.89/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 clauses 38
% 3.89/1.14 conjectures 0
% 3.89/1.14 EPR 26
% 3.89/1.14 Horn 35
% 3.89/1.14 unary 31
% 3.89/1.14 binary 4
% 3.89/1.14 lits 48
% 3.89/1.14 lits eq 34
% 3.89/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 3.89/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.89/1.14 fd_cond 1
% 3.89/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 3.89/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------
% 3.89/1.14 Current options:
% 3.89/1.14 ------
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.89/1.14
% 3.89/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------