TSTP Solution File: SWW425-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW425-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:17:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 14.06s 2.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 14.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 10 unt; 14 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 29 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_50,plain,
x1 != x7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_2) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
x1 != x10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_3) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
x7 != x2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_11) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x5,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x6,x9),emp))))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_12) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)))
| X0 = X1
| X0 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',wellformedness_5) ).
cnf(c_181,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x5,x7),emp))))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_630,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X0,X3),X4))))
| X0 = X1
| X0 = X3 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_1084,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))))
| X1 = X2
| X1 = X3 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_630]) ).
cnf(c_1538,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X3,sep(lseg(X1,X4),X5)))))
| X1 = X2
| X1 = X4 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_1084]) ).
cnf(c_3042,plain,
( x1 = x2
| x2 = x5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_1538]) ).
cnf(c_3046,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(lseg(X2,X4),X5)))))
| X2 = X3
| X2 = X4 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_1538]) ).
cnf(c_3081,plain,
( x1 = x2
| heap(sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x7),emp))))))))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3042,c_181]) ).
cnf(c_3597,plain,
( x10 = x2
| x2 = x5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_3046]) ).
cnf(c_3624,plain,
( x10 = x2
| heap(sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x7),emp))))))))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3597,c_181]) ).
cnf(c_22954,plain,
( x1 = x2
| heap(sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),emp)))))))) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3081,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_22968,plain,
( x1 = x2
| x7 = x2 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_22954,c_1084]) ).
cnf(c_23181,plain,
x1 = x2,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_22968,c_59]) ).
cnf(c_24040,plain,
( x1 = x10
| heap(sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x1,x1),sep(lseg(x1,x10),sep(lseg(x1,x1),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x1,x7),emp))))))))) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3624,c_23181]) ).
cnf(c_24041,plain,
( x1 = x10
| heap(sep(lseg(x1,x7),sep(lseg(x1,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),emp))))))) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_24040,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_24042,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x1,x7),sep(lseg(x1,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x10),emp))))))),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24041,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_24043,plain,
( x1 = x7
| x1 = x10 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_24042,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_24259,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24043,c_51,c_50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWW425-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 06:51:24 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 14.06/2.67 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 14.06/2.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ iProver source info
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 14.06/2.67 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 14.06/2.67 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Parsing...successful
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Proving...
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Problem Properties
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 clauses 23
% 14.06/2.67 conjectures 0
% 14.06/2.67 EPR 11
% 14.06/2.67 Horn 20
% 14.06/2.67 unary 16
% 14.06/2.67 binary 4
% 14.06/2.67 lits 33
% 14.06/2.67 lits eq 19
% 14.06/2.67 fd_pure 0
% 14.06/2.67 fd_pseudo 0
% 14.06/2.67 fd_cond 1
% 14.06/2.67 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 14.06/2.67 AC symbols 0
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------
% 14.06/2.67 Current options:
% 14.06/2.67 ------
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 ------ Proving...
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 14.06/2.67
% 14.06/2.67
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------