TSTP Solution File: SWW421-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:11:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   3 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   7 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unfolding_2,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p',unfolding_2) ).

cnf(associative_commutative,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p',associative_commutative) ).

cnf(premise_4,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p',premise_4) ).

cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
    x2 != x1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p',premise_2) ).

cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p',conclusion_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    unfolding_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    associative_commutative ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(next(X1,X2),X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
    premise_4 ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    x2 != x1,
    premise_2 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)),
    conclusion_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 23:01:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.52  Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.v92Sv3cV7K/E---3.1_18773.p
% 0.37/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18850 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.37/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.54  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 226s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 18854 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.37/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.54  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.37/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.54  
% 0.37/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.37/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.37/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.37/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 237
% 0.37/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 181
% 0.37/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.37/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 430
% 0.37/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 410
% 0.37/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 430
% 0.37/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.45/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.45/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.45/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 40
% 0.45/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.45/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.45/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.45/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.45/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 196
% 0.45/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 388
% 0.45/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.45/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.45/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 227
% 0.45/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 227
% 0.45/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 54
% 0.45/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.45/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.45/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 47
% 0.45/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 44
% 0.45/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.45/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.45/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4975
% 0.45/0.54  
% 0.45/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.54  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.45/0.54  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.45/0.54  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.45/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.45/0.54  
% 0.45/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.54  # User time                : 0.040 s
% 0.45/0.54  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.45/0.54  # Total time               : 0.048 s
% 0.45/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.45/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------