TSTP Solution File: SWW421-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:14:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 21:58:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.78 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.78 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.78 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.78 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.78 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.78 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.78
% 0.20/0.78 % Result :Theorem 0.150000s
% 0.20/0.78 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.150000s
% 0.20/0.78 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.78 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.78 % File : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.20/0.78 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.20/0.78 % Problem : Verification Condition generated by Smallfoot
% 0.20/0.78 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.78 % English : This is one of the verification conditions that were gathered
% 0.20/0.78 % from the output of Smallfoot when checking assertions on list
% 0.20/0.78 % manipulating programs from its own benchmark suite.
% 0.20/0.78
% 0.20/0.78 % Refs : [BCO06] Berdine et al. (2006), Smallfoot: Modular Automatic As
% 0.20/0.78 % : [RN11] Rybalchenko & Navarro Perez (2011), Separation Logic +
% 0.20/0.78 % : [Nav11] Navarro Perez (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.78 % Source : [Nav11]
% 0.20/0.78 % Names : smallfoot-vc71 [Nav11]
% 0.20/0.78
% 0.20/0.78 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.78 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0
% 0.20/0.78 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 3 nHn; 14 RR)
% 0.20/0.78 % Number of literals : 26 ( 11 equ; 13 neg)
% 0.20/0.78 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.78 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.78 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.78 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.78 % Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn)
% 0.20/0.78 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.78
% 0.20/0.78 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.78 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.78 %----Include axioms for Lists in Separation Logic
% 0.20/0.78 include('Axioms/SWV013-0.ax').
% 0.20/0.78 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.78 cnf(premise_1,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.78 nil != x1 ).
% 0.20/0.78
% 0.20/0.78 cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.79 x2 != x1 ).
% 0.20/0.79
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.79 x1 != x3 ).
% 0.20/0.79
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(premise_4,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.79 heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))) ).
% 0.20/0.79
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.79 ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)) ).
% 0.20/0.79
% 0.20/0.79 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.79 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.79 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.79 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.79 %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.20/0.79 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:38)
% 0.20/0.79 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.79 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.20/0.79 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.79 %goalClause: 17
% 0.20/0.79 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.79 [14]~E(a5,a7)
% 0.20/0.79 [15]~E(a7,a6)
% 0.20/0.79 [16]~E(a7,a8)
% 0.20/0.79 [17]~P1(f3(f1(a7,a8),a2))
% 0.20/0.79 [13]P1(f3(f1(a6,a8),f3(f4(a7,a6),a2)))
% 0.20/0.79 [11]E(f3(f1(x111,x111),x112),x112)
% 0.20/0.79 [18]~P1(f3(f4(a5,x181),x182))
% 0.20/0.79 [12]E(f3(x121,f3(x122,x123)),f3(x122,f3(x121,x123)))
% 0.20/0.79 [19]~P1(f3(f4(x191,x192),f3(f4(x191,x193),x194)))
% 0.20/0.79 [20]E(x201,a5)+~P1(f3(f1(a5,x201),x202))
% 0.20/0.79 [23]P1(f3(f1(x231,a5),x232))+~P1(f3(f1(x231,x233),f3(f1(x233,a5),x232)))
% 0.20/0.79 [21]E(x211,x212)+~P1(f3(f4(x211,x213),f3(f1(x211,x212),x214)))
% 0.20/0.79 [25]P1(f3(f1(x251,x252),f3(f4(x252,x253),x254)))+~P1(f3(f1(x251,x255),f3(f1(x255,x252),f3(f4(x252,x253),x254))))
% 0.20/0.79 [22]E(x221,x222)+E(x221,x223)+~P1(f3(f1(x221,x223),f3(f1(x221,x222),x224)))
% 0.20/0.79 [24]E(x241,x242)+P1(f3(f1(x241,x243),x244))+~P1(f3(f4(x241,x242),f3(f1(x242,x243),x244)))
% 0.20/0.79 [26]E(x261,x262)+P1(f3(f1(x263,x261),f3(f1(x261,x262),x264)))+~P1(f3(f1(x263,x265),f3(f1(x265,x261),f3(f1(x261,x262),x264))))
% 0.20/0.79 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.79 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.79 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.79 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.79 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.20/0.79 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.20/0.79 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.20/0.79 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.20/0.79 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83),f4(x82,x83))
% 0.20/0.79 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91),f4(x93,x92))
% 0.20/0.79 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.20/0.79
% 0.20/0.79 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(x271,f3(f1(x272,x272),x271))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (~P1(f3(f1(x281,x281),f3(f1(a7,a8),a2)))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,11,2,10])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f3(f1(x291,x291),x292),x292)),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (~E(a5,f3(f1(x301,x301),a7))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,11,29,2,10,3])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(31,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f3(f1(x311,x311),x312),x312)),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(33,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f4(f3(f1(x331,x331),x332),x333),f4(x332,x333))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f3(x341,f3(f1(x342,x342),x343)),f3(x341,x343))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8,7])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(36,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f1(x361,f3(f1(x362,x362),x363)),f1(x361,x363))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8,7,6,5])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f1(f3(f1(x371,x371),x372),x373),f1(x372,x373))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8,7,6,5,4])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(44,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (~P1(f3(f4(a7,a6),f3(f1(a6,a8),a2)))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,15,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8,7,6,5,4,21,23,22,24])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(46,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (P1(f3(f1(x461,a7),f3(f1(a7,a6),x462)))+~P1(f3(f1(x461,x463),f3(f1(x463,a7),f3(f1(a7,a6),x462))))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,15,11,29,31,2,10,3,9,8,7,6,5,4,21,23,22,24,26])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(53,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (~E(a8,a7)),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,16,13,24,10,22,2])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(67,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f3(f1(x671,x671),x672),x672)),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (E(f3(f1(x681,x681),f4(f3(f1(x682,x682),x683),x684)),f4(x683,x684))),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,67,19,33,10,3])).
% 0.20/0.79 cnf(70,plain,
% 0.20/0.79 (~E(a7,a5)),
% 0.20/0.79 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,67,19,14,33,10,3,2])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(71,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~P1(f3(f1(a5,a7),x711))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,67,19,14,33,10,3,2,20])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(81,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (E(f3(x811,f3(x812,f3(x813,x814))),f3(x811,f3(x813,f3(x812,x814))))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,27,28,13,15,34,71,3,10,2,46,8,7])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(108,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (P1(f3(f1(x1081,x1081),f3(f1(a6,a8),f3(f4(a7,a6),a2))))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,27,28,16,36,37,70,22,24,3,10])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(123,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~E(f1(a6,a8),f4(a7,x1231))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,30,19,27,3,10,2,20,6])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(138,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (P1(f3(f1(x1381,x1381),f3(f4(a7,a6),f3(f1(a6,a8),a2))))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[81,108,10])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(140,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~E(f1(a6,a8),f3(f1(x1401,x1401),f4(f3(f1(x1402,x1402),a7),x1403)))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[68,81,108,123,10,3])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(147,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~E(f3(f1(x1471,x1471),f1(a6,a8)),f3(f1(x1472,x1472),f4(f3(f1(x1473,x1473),a7),x1474)))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,27,140,6,3])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(165,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~E(f3(f1(x1651,x1651),f4(f3(f1(x1652,x1652),a7),x1653)),f3(f1(x1654,x1654),f1(a6,a8)))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,28,27,147,53,24,22,7,3,2])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(167,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (~E(f4(f3(f1(x1671,x1671),a7),x1672),f1(a6,a8))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[165,7])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(224,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 (E(f1(f3(f1(x2241,x2241),x2242),x2243),f1(x2242,x2243))),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(rename_variables,[],[37])).
% 0.20/0.80 cnf(226,plain,
% 0.20/0.80 ($false),
% 0.20/0.80 inference(scs_inference,[],[37,224,167,44,138,11,3,2,10]),
% 0.20/0.80 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.80 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.80 % Total time :0.150000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------