TSTP Solution File: SWW417-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWW417-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:11:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   3 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   7 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unfolding_2,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p',unfolding_2) ).

cnf(associative_commutative,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p',associative_commutative) ).

cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p',premise_3) ).

cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
    x2 != x1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p',premise_2) ).

cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p',conclusion_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    unfolding_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    associative_commutative ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(next(X1,X2),X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
    premise_3 ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    x2 != x1,
    premise_2 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    conclusion_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SWW417-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 22:12:43 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MAymsTIFpK/E---3.1_2392.p
% 0.14/0.41  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2469 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 226s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2475 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.14/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.14/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.14/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 215
% 0.14/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 163
% 0.14/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.14/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 404
% 0.14/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 384
% 0.14/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 404
% 0.14/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.14/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.14/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.14/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.14/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 0.14/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 190
% 0.14/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 362
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.14/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 203
% 0.14/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 203
% 0.14/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 50
% 0.14/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.14/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 48
% 0.14/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 46
% 0.14/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4738
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  # User time                : 0.048 s
% 0.14/0.41  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Total time               : 0.055 s
% 0.14/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.14/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------