TSTP Solution File: SWW417-1 by CSE---1.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : SWW417-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:09:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09 % Problem : SWW417-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 04:53:08 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.53 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.57 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.52/0.57 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.57 % Transform :cnf
% 0.52/0.57 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.57 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.57
% 0.52/0.57 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.57 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.57 % File : SWW417-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.52/0.57 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.52/0.57 % Problem : Verification Condition generated by Smallfoot
% 0.52/0.57 % Version : Especial.
% 0.52/0.57 % English : This is one of the verification conditions that were gathered
% 0.52/0.57 % from the output of Smallfoot when checking assertions on list
% 0.52/0.57 % manipulating programs from its own benchmark suite.
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 % Refs : [BCO06] Berdine et al. (2006), Smallfoot: Modular Automatic As
% 0.52/0.58 % : [RN11] Rybalchenko & Navarro Perez (2011), Separation Logic +
% 0.52/0.58 % : [Nav11] Navarro Perez (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.58 % Source : [Nav11]
% 0.52/0.58 % Names : smallfoot-vc67 [Nav11]
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.58 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0
% 0.52/0.58 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% 0.52/0.58 % Number of literals : 25 ( 10 equ; 12 neg)
% 0.52/0.58 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.58 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.52/0.58 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.58 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.58 % Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn)
% 0.52/0.58 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 % Comments :
% 0.52/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.58 %----Include axioms for Lists in Separation Logic
% 0.52/0.58 include('Axioms/SWV013-0.ax').
% 0.52/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(premise_1,hypothesis,
% 0.52/0.58 nil != x1 ).
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
% 0.52/0.58 x2 != x1 ).
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
% 0.52/0.58 heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))) ).
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.58 ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)) ).
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.52/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.58 %ClaNum:25(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.52/0.58 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:38)
% 0.52/0.58 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.52/0.58 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.52/0.58 %SharedTerms:14
% 0.52/0.58 %goalClause: 16
% 0.52/0.58 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.52/0.58 [14]~E(a7,a4)
% 0.52/0.58 [15]~E(a7,a6)
% 0.52/0.58 [16]~P1(f3(f1(a7,a4),a2))
% 0.52/0.58 [13]P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),f3(f5(a7,a6),a2)))
% 0.52/0.58 [11]E(f3(f1(x111,x111),x112),x112)
% 0.52/0.58 [17]~P1(f3(f5(a4,x171),x172))
% 0.52/0.58 [12]E(f3(x121,f3(x122,x123)),f3(x122,f3(x121,x123)))
% 0.52/0.58 [18]~P1(f3(f5(x181,x182),f3(f5(x181,x183),x184)))
% 0.52/0.58 [19]E(x191,a4)+~P1(f3(f1(a4,x191),x192))
% 0.52/0.58 [22]P1(f3(f1(x221,a4),x222))+~P1(f3(f1(x221,x223),f3(f1(x223,a4),x222)))
% 0.52/0.58 [20]E(x201,x202)+~P1(f3(f5(x201,x203),f3(f1(x201,x202),x204)))
% 0.52/0.58 [24]P1(f3(f1(x241,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244)))+~P1(f3(f1(x241,x245),f3(f1(x245,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244))))
% 0.52/0.58 [21]E(x211,x212)+E(x211,x213)+~P1(f3(f1(x211,x213),f3(f1(x211,x212),x214)))
% 0.52/0.58 [23]E(x231,x232)+P1(f3(f1(x231,x233),x234))+~P1(f3(f5(x231,x232),f3(f1(x232,x233),x234)))
% 0.52/0.58 [25]E(x251,x252)+P1(f3(f1(x253,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254)))+~P1(f3(f1(x253,x255),f3(f1(x255,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254))))
% 0.52/0.58 %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.58 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.52/0.58 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.52/0.58 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.52/0.58 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.52/0.58 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.52/0.58 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.52/0.58 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.52/0.58 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.52/0.58 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.52/0.58 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.52/0.58
% 0.52/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.52/0.58 (E(x261,f3(f1(x262,x262),x261))),
% 0.52/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2])).
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.52/0.58 (E(f1(f3(f1(x401,x401),x402),x403),f1(x402,x403))),
% 0.52/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,4,2])).
% 0.52/0.58 cnf(46,plain,
% 0.52/0.58 ($false),
% 0.52/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,16,40,15,12,11,2,3,10,23]),
% 0.52/0.58 ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.58 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------