TSTP Solution File: SWW413-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:26:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 23:01:31 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Sun Jun 5 23:01:31 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4454.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 17
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.14/0.41 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.14/0.41 distinct function count: 3
% 0.14/0.41 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.04 sec ----> 148 [hyper,137,6,unit_del,14,19] {-} $F.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 6 [] {+} -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)).
% 0.22/0.45 14 [] {+} x3!=x2.
% 0.22/0.45 19 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)).
% 0.22/0.45 21 [] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.22/0.45 24 [] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))).
% 0.22/0.45 137 [para_into,24.1.1,21.1.1] {-} heap(sep(next(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp))).
% 0.22/0.45 148 [hyper,137,6,unit_del,14,19] {-} $F.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.45 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 ============ end of search ============
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.22/0.45 false clauses given 4
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 FALSE TRUE
% 0.22/0.45 3 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 6 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 8 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 9 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 11 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 12 0 3
% 0.22/0.45 13 0 4
% 0.22/0.45 15 2 4
% 0.22/0.45 16 3 6
% 0.22/0.45 17 2 0
% 0.22/0.45 18 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 19 0 4
% 0.22/0.45 20 5 7
% 0.22/0.45 22 2 2
% 0.22/0.45 23 1 13
% 0.22/0.45 24 1 7
% 0.22/0.45 25 1 2
% 0.22/0.45 26 0 4
% 0.22/0.45 27 0 10
% 0.22/0.45 28 1 7
% 0.22/0.45 29 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 30 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 31 0 5
% 0.22/0.45 32 0 2
% 0.22/0.45 34 0 5
% 0.22/0.45 36 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 37 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 39 0 2
% 0.22/0.45 40 0 2
% 0.22/0.45 41 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 46 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 47 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 56 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 58 0 1
% 0.22/0.45 tot: 18 104 (85.2% true)
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Process 4454 finished Sun Jun 5 23:01:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------