TSTP Solution File: SWW413-1 by CSE---1.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:09:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.15 % Problem : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 08:40:09 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.53/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.54/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.64
% 0.54/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.54/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.54/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 % File : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.54/0.65 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.54/0.65 % Problem : Verification Condition generated by Smallfoot
% 0.54/0.65 % Version : Especial.
% 0.54/0.65 % English : This is one of the verification conditions that were gathered
% 0.54/0.65 % from the output of Smallfoot when checking assertions on list
% 0.54/0.65 % manipulating programs from its own benchmark suite.
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 % Refs : [BCO06] Berdine et al. (2006), Smallfoot: Modular Automatic As
% 0.54/0.65 % : [RN11] Rybalchenko & Navarro Perez (2011), Separation Logic +
% 0.54/0.65 % : [Nav11] Navarro Perez (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.54/0.65 % Source : [Nav11]
% 0.54/0.65 % Names : smallfoot-vc46 [Nav11]
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.65 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.20 v6.4.0, 0.13 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0
% 0.54/0.65 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 12 unt; 3 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.54/0.65 % Number of literals : 29 ( 14 equ; 16 neg)
% 0.54/0.65 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.54/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.54/0.65 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.54/0.65 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.54/0.65 % Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn)
% 0.54/0.65 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 % Comments :
% 0.54/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 %----Include axioms for Lists in Separation Logic
% 0.54/0.65 include('Axioms/SWV013-0.ax').
% 0.54/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_1,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 nil != x1 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 nil != x2 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 x3 != x2 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_4,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 x4 != x1 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_5,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 x4 != x2 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_6,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 x1 != x2 ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(premise_7,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.65 heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))) ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.65 ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)) ).
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.54/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.65 %ClaNum:29(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.54/0.65 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:38)
% 0.54/0.65 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.54/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.54/0.65 %SharedTerms:20
% 0.54/0.65 %goalClause: 20
% 0.54/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.54/0.65 [14]~E(a8,a4)
% 0.54/0.65 [15]~E(a7,a4)
% 0.54/0.65 [16]~E(a8,a7)
% 0.54/0.65 [17]~E(a7,a6)
% 0.54/0.65 [18]~E(a9,a8)
% 0.54/0.65 [19]~E(a9,a7)
% 0.54/0.65 [20]~P1(f3(f1(a7,a4),a2))
% 0.54/0.65 [13]P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),f3(f5(a7,a6),a2)))
% 0.54/0.65 [11]E(f3(f1(x111,x111),x112),x112)
% 0.54/0.65 [21]~P1(f3(f5(a4,x211),x212))
% 0.54/0.65 [12]E(f3(x121,f3(x122,x123)),f3(x122,f3(x121,x123)))
% 0.54/0.65 [22]~P1(f3(f5(x221,x222),f3(f5(x221,x223),x224)))
% 0.54/0.65 [23]E(x231,a4)+~P1(f3(f1(a4,x231),x232))
% 0.54/0.65 [26]P1(f3(f1(x261,a4),x262))+~P1(f3(f1(x261,x263),f3(f1(x263,a4),x262)))
% 0.54/0.65 [24]E(x241,x242)+~P1(f3(f5(x241,x243),f3(f1(x241,x242),x244)))
% 0.54/0.65 [28]P1(f3(f1(x281,x282),f3(f5(x282,x283),x284)))+~P1(f3(f1(x281,x285),f3(f1(x285,x282),f3(f5(x282,x283),x284))))
% 0.54/0.65 [25]E(x251,x252)+E(x251,x253)+~P1(f3(f1(x251,x253),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254)))
% 0.54/0.65 [27]E(x271,x272)+P1(f3(f1(x271,x273),x274))+~P1(f3(f5(x271,x272),f3(f1(x272,x273),x274)))
% 0.54/0.65 [29]E(x291,x292)+P1(f3(f1(x293,x291),f3(f1(x291,x292),x294)))+~P1(f3(f1(x293,x295),f3(f1(x295,x291),f3(f1(x291,x292),x294))))
% 0.54/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.65 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.54/0.65 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.54/0.65 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.54/0.65 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.54/0.65 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.54/0.65 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.54/0.65 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.54/0.65 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.54/0.65 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.54/0.65 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.54/0.65
% 0.54/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.54/0.65 (E(x301,f3(f1(x302,x302),x301))),
% 0.54/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2])).
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.54/0.65 (E(f3(x491,f5(x492,x493)),f3(x491,f5(f3(f1(x494,x494),x492),x493)))),
% 0.54/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,7,8])).
% 0.54/0.65 cnf(56,plain,
% 0.54/0.65 ($false),
% 0.54/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,20,30,12,49,17,2,3,10,27]),
% 0.54/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.65 % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------