TSTP Solution File: SWW413-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:07:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.11s 2.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   9 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   7   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ heap > sep > next > lseg > #nlpp > x4 > x3 > x2 > x1 > nil > emp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lseg,type,
    lseg: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sep,type,
    sep: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(x3,type,
    x3: $i ).

tff(x4,type,
    x4: $i ).

tff(x1,type,
    x1: $i ).

tff(heap,type,
    heap: $i > $o ).

tff(emp,type,
    emp: $i ).

tff(next,type,
    next: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: $i ).

tff(x2,type,
    x2: $i ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    x3 != x2,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_135,axiom,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_133,axiom,
    heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [S,T,Sigma] : ( sep(S,sep(T,Sigma)) = sep(T,sep(S,Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_96,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,Sigma] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),Sigma)))
      | ( X = Y )
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    x3 != x2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_133]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [T_2,S_1,Sigma_3] : ( sep(T_2,sep(S_1,Sigma_3)) = sep(S_1,sep(T_2,Sigma_3)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_443,plain,
    ! [X_91,Z_92,Sigma_93,Y_94] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_91,Z_92),Sigma_93))
      | ( Y_94 = X_91 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X_91,Y_94),sep(lseg(Y_94,Z_92),Sigma_93))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_96]) ).

tff(c_4185,plain,
    ! [X_190,Z_191,Sigma_192,Y_193] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_190,Z_191),Sigma_192))
      | ( Y_193 = X_190 )
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(Y_193,Z_191),sep(next(X_190,Y_193),Sigma_192))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_443]) ).

tff(c_4240,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp))
    | ( x3 = x2 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_4185]) ).

tff(c_4264,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_38,c_4240]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW413-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:34:07 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.11/2.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.11/2.82  
% 7.11/2.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.36/2.85  
% 7.36/2.85  Inference rules
% 7.36/2.85  ----------------------
% 7.36/2.85  #Ref     : 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Sup     : 1085
% 7.36/2.85  #Fact    : 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Define  : 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Split   : 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Chain   : 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Close   : 0
% 7.36/2.85  
% 7.36/2.85  Ordering : KBO
% 7.36/2.85  
% 7.36/2.85  Simplification rules
% 7.36/2.85  ----------------------
% 7.36/2.85  #Subsume      : 495
% 7.36/2.85  #Demod        : 68
% 7.36/2.85  #Tautology    : 110
% 7.36/2.85  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 7.36/2.85  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.36/2.85  
% 7.36/2.85  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.36/2.85  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.36/2.85  
% 7.36/2.85  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.36/2.85  ----------------------
% 7.81/2.86  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 7.81/2.86  Parsing              : 0.27
% 7.81/2.86  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 7.81/2.86  Main loop            : 1.30
% 7.81/2.86  Inferencing          : 0.39
% 7.81/2.86  Reduction            : 0.65
% 7.81/2.86  Demodulation         : 0.57
% 7.81/2.86  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 7.81/2.86  Subsumption          : 0.17
% 7.81/2.86  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 7.81/2.86  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.81/2.86  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.81/2.86  Total                : 1.87
% 7.81/2.86  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.81/2.86  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.81/2.86  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.81/2.86  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------