TSTP Solution File: SWW412-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW412-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:26:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.07s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWW412-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 09:52:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Sat Jun  4 09:52:44 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5262.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [copy,24,flip.1] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [copy,28,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.22/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 23
% 0.22/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.22/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.22/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.22/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.22/0.40     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.22/0.40     distinct function count: 3
% 0.22/0.40     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.86 sec ----> 1778 [hyper,1495,6,unit_del,19,48] {-} $F.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  6 [] {+} -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)).
% 1.07/1.27  15 [] {+} x3!=x2.
% 1.07/1.27  18 [] {-} x1!=x4.
% 1.07/1.27  19 [copy,18,flip.1] {+} x4!=x1.
% 1.07/1.27  22 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))).
% 1.07/1.27  24 [] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 1.07/1.27  27 [] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x1,x4),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))))).
% 1.07/1.27  29 [para_into,24.1.1.2,24.1.1] {+} sep(A,sep(B,sep(C,D)))=sep(C,sep(A,sep(B,D))).
% 1.07/1.27  48 [para_from,24.1.1,22.1.1] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp))).
% 1.07/1.27  178 [para_into,27.1.1.2.2,24.1.1] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x4),emp))))).
% 1.07/1.27  339 [para_from,29.1.1,178.1.1] {-} heap(sep(next(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x1,x4),emp))))).
% 1.07/1.27  964 [hyper,339,6,unit_del,15] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x1,x4),emp)))).
% 1.07/1.27  1148 [para_into,964.1.1,29.1.1] {-} heap(sep(next(x1,x4),sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp)))).
% 1.07/1.27  1495 [para_into,1148.1.1.2,24.1.1] {-} heap(sep(next(x1,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)))).
% 1.07/1.27  1778 [hyper,1495,6,unit_del,19,48] {-} $F.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.07/1.27  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  ============ end of search ============
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  true clauses given           8      (36.4%)
% 1.07/1.27  false clauses given         14
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.07/1.27     8  0         2
% 1.07/1.27     9  0         1
% 1.07/1.27    10  0         4
% 1.07/1.27    11  0         1
% 1.07/1.27    12  0         7
% 1.07/1.27    13  0         4
% 1.07/1.27    14  1         5
% 1.07/1.27    15  0         8
% 1.07/1.27    16  2         9
% 1.07/1.27    17  0         3
% 1.07/1.27    18  9         9
% 1.07/1.27    19  0         16
% 1.07/1.27    20  16        35
% 1.07/1.27    21  0         5
% 1.07/1.27    22  0         4
% 1.07/1.27    23  0         15
% 1.07/1.27    24  64        73
% 1.07/1.27    25  0         11
% 1.07/1.27    26  16        12
% 1.07/1.27    27  24        41
% 1.07/1.27    28  83        45
% 1.07/1.27    29  0         18
% 1.07/1.27    30  32        53
% 1.07/1.27    31  58        88
% 1.07/1.27    32  11        33
% 1.07/1.27    33  0         11
% 1.07/1.27    34  11        55
% 1.07/1.27    35  36        57
% 1.07/1.27    36  11        53
% 1.07/1.27    37  0         10
% 1.07/1.27    38  11        35
% 1.07/1.27    39  14        19
% 1.07/1.27    40  7         35
% 1.07/1.27    41  0         23
% 1.07/1.27    42  7         64
% 1.07/1.27    43  6         17
% 1.07/1.27    44  7         42
% 1.07/1.27    45  0         29
% 1.07/1.27    46  7         19
% 1.07/1.27    47  14        27
% 1.07/1.27    48  0         45
% 1.07/1.27    49  0         12
% 1.07/1.27    50  0         23
% 1.07/1.27    51  8         18
% 1.07/1.27    52  0         25
% 1.07/1.27    53  0         26
% 1.07/1.27    54  0         13
% 1.07/1.27    55  14        15
% 1.07/1.27    56  0         11
% 1.07/1.27    57  0         27
% 1.07/1.27    58  0         14
% 1.07/1.27    59  0         12
% 1.07/1.27    60  0         9
% 1.07/1.27  tot:  469       1248      (72.7% true)
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  Process 5262 finished Sat Jun  4 09:52:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------