TSTP Solution File: SWW412-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWW412-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:07:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 63.61s 51.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 63.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  21 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  17   ~;  18   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (;  56   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ heap > sep > next > lseg > #nlpp > x4 > x3 > x2 > x1 > nil > emp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lseg,type,
    lseg: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sep,type,
    sep: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(x3,type,
    x3: $i ).

tff(x4,type,
    x4: $i ).

tff(x1,type,
    x1: $i ).

tff(heap,type,
    heap: $i > $o ).

tff(emp,type,
    emp: $i ).

tff(next,type,
    next: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: $i ).

tff(x2,type,
    x2: $i ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [S,T,Sigma] : ( sep(S,sep(T,Sigma)) = sep(T,sep(S,Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_137,axiom,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_128,axiom,
    x3 != x2,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_132,axiom,
    x1 != x4,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_135,axiom,
    heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x1,x4),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [X,Sigma] : ( sep(lseg(X,X),Sigma) = Sigma ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_96,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,Sigma] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),Sigma)))
      | ( X = Y )
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_102,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Sigma] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,nil),Sigma)))
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,nil),Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [T_2,S_1,Sigma_3] : ( sep(T_2,sep(S_1,Sigma_3)) = sep(S_1,sep(T_2,Sigma_3)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_40]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    x3 != x2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_128]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    x4 != x1,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_132]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x1,x4),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    ! [T_45,S_46,Sigma_47] : ( sep(T_45,sep(S_46,Sigma_47)) = sep(S_46,sep(T_45,Sigma_47)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_67,plain,
    ! [S_46,S_1,T_45,Sigma_47] : ( sep(S_46,sep(S_1,sep(T_45,Sigma_47))) = sep(S_1,sep(T_45,sep(S_46,Sigma_47))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_58,c_2]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_4,Sigma_5] : ( sep(lseg(X_4,X_4),Sigma_5) = Sigma_5 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_925,plain,
    ! [X_100,Z_101,Sigma_102,Y_103] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_100,Z_101),Sigma_102))
      | ( Y_103 = X_100 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X_100,Y_103),sep(lseg(Y_103,Z_101),Sigma_102))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_96]) ).

tff(c_1115,plain,
    ! [X_118,X_119,Sigma_120] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_118,X_119),Sigma_120))
      | ( X_119 = X_118 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X_118,X_119),Sigma_120)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_925]) ).

tff(c_76791,plain,
    ! [S_618,Sigma_617,T_619,X_616,X_620] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_620,X_616),sep(S_618,sep(T_619,Sigma_617))))
      | ( X_620 = X_616 )
      | ~ heap(sep(S_618,sep(T_619,sep(next(X_620,X_616),Sigma_617)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_67,c_1115]) ).

tff(c_77147,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x1,x4),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp)))))
    | ( x4 = x1 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_76791]) ).

tff(c_77184,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x4),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp))))),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_77147]) ).

tff(c_354,plain,
    ! [X_79,Sigma_80,Y_81] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_79,nil),Sigma_80))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_79,Y_81),sep(lseg(Y_81,nil),Sigma_80))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_102]) ).

tff(c_358,plain,
    ! [X_79,T_2,Sigma_3,Y_81] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_79,nil),sep(T_2,Sigma_3)))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_79,Y_81),sep(T_2,sep(lseg(Y_81,nil),Sigma_3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_354]) ).

tff(c_77210,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x2,x3),emp)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_77184,c_358]) ).

tff(c_1123,plain,
    ! [T_45,X_119,S_1,Sigma_47,X_118] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_118,X_119),sep(S_1,sep(T_45,Sigma_47))))
      | ( X_119 = X_118 )
      | ~ heap(sep(S_1,sep(T_45,sep(next(X_118,X_119),Sigma_47)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_67,c_1115]) ).

tff(c_77212,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp))))
    | ( x3 = x2 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_77210,c_1123]) ).

tff(c_77224,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp))))
    | ( x3 = x2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_77212]) ).

tff(c_77225,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp)))),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_77224]) ).

tff(c_4262,plain,
    ! [X_194,T_195,Sigma_196,Y_197] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_194,nil),sep(T_195,Sigma_196)))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_194,Y_197),sep(T_195,sep(lseg(Y_197,nil),Sigma_196)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_354]) ).

tff(c_4358,plain,
    ! [X_194,T_2,Sigma_196,Y_197] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_194,nil),sep(T_2,Sigma_196)))
      | ~ heap(sep(T_2,sep(lseg(X_194,Y_197),sep(lseg(Y_197,nil),Sigma_196)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_4262]) ).

tff(c_77238,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_77225,c_4358]) ).

tff(c_77250,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_77238]) ).

tff(c_77252,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_77250]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWW412-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:34:09 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 63.61/51.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 63.61/51.57  
% 63.61/51.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 63.61/51.60  
% 63.61/51.60  Inference rules
% 63.61/51.60  ----------------------
% 63.61/51.60  #Ref     : 0
% 63.61/51.60  #Sup     : 20997
% 63.61/51.61  #Fact    : 0
% 63.61/51.61  #Define  : 0
% 63.61/51.61  #Split   : 0
% 63.61/51.61  #Chain   : 0
% 63.61/51.61  #Close   : 0
% 63.61/51.61  
% 63.61/51.61  Ordering : KBO
% 63.61/51.61  
% 63.61/51.61  Simplification rules
% 63.61/51.61  ----------------------
% 63.61/51.61  #Subsume      : 8574
% 63.61/51.61  #Demod        : 1395
% 63.61/51.61  #Tautology    : 731
% 63.61/51.61  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 63.61/51.61  #BackRed      : 0
% 63.61/51.61  
% 63.61/51.61  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 63.61/51.61  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 63.61/51.61  
% 63.61/51.61  Timing (in seconds)
% 63.61/51.61  ----------------------
% 63.61/51.61  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 63.61/51.61  Parsing              : 0.25
% 63.61/51.61  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 63.61/51.61  Main loop            : 50.04
% 63.61/51.61  Inferencing          : 3.09
% 63.61/51.61  Reduction            : 44.33
% 63.61/51.61  Demodulation         : 43.81
% 63.61/51.61  BG Simplification    : 0.34
% 63.61/51.61  Subsumption          : 1.89
% 63.61/51.61  Abstraction          : 0.46
% 63.61/51.61  MUC search           : 0.00
% 63.61/51.61  Cooper               : 0.00
% 63.61/51.61  Total                : 50.58
% 63.61/51.61  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 63.61/51.61  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 63.61/51.61  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 63.61/51.61  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------