TSTP Solution File: SWW410-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWW410-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:07:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 44.69s 33.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 44.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  20 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  18   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (;  61   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ heap > sep > next > lseg > #nlpp > x3 > x2 > x1 > nil > emp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lseg,type,
    lseg: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sep,type,
    sep: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(x3,type,
    x3: $i ).

tff(x1,type,
    x1: $i ).

tff(heap,type,
    heap: $i > $o ).

tff(emp,type,
    emp: $i ).

tff(next,type,
    next: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: $i ).

tff(x2,type,
    x2: $i ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [X,Sigma] : ( sep(lseg(X,X),Sigma) = Sigma ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [S,T,Sigma] : ( sep(S,sep(T,Sigma)) = sep(T,sep(S,Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_131,axiom,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x2,x3),emp))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    x1 != x3,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_129,axiom,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x1,x3),emp)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_96,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,Sigma] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),Sigma)))
      | ( X = Y )
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_118,axiom,
    ! [Sigma,W,Z,X,Y] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),sep(lseg(Z,W),Sigma))))
      | ( Z = W )
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),sep(lseg(Z,W),Sigma))) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_102,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Sigma] :
      ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,nil),Sigma)))
      | heap(sep(lseg(X,nil),Sigma)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_4,Sigma_5] : ( sep(lseg(X_4,X_4),Sigma_5) = Sigma_5 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [T_2,S_1,Sigma_3] : ( sep(T_2,sep(S_1,Sigma_3)) = sep(S_1,sep(T_2,Sigma_3)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(lseg(x2,x3),emp))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_131]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_34]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    x3 != x1,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x1,x3),emp)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_129]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    ! [T_49,S_50,Sigma_51] : ( sep(T_49,sep(S_50,Sigma_51)) = sep(S_50,sep(T_49,Sigma_51)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    ! [T_49,T_2,S_1,Sigma_3] : ( sep(T_49,sep(T_2,sep(S_1,Sigma_3))) = sep(S_1,sep(T_49,sep(T_2,Sigma_3))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_53]) ).

tff(c_1018,plain,
    ! [X_109,Z_110,Sigma_111,Y_112] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_109,Z_110),Sigma_111))
      | ( Y_112 = X_109 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X_109,Y_112),sep(lseg(Y_112,Z_110),Sigma_111))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_96]) ).

tff(c_1109,plain,
    ! [X_118,X_119,Sigma_120] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_118,X_119),Sigma_120))
      | ( X_119 = X_118 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X_118,X_119),Sigma_120)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_1018]) ).

tff(c_61790,plain,
    ! [X_568,T_571,T_569,Sigma_570,X_572] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_572,X_568),sep(T_571,sep(T_569,Sigma_570))))
      | ( X_572 = X_568 )
      | ~ heap(sep(T_571,sep(T_569,sep(next(X_572,X_568),Sigma_570)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_120,c_1109]) ).

tff(c_62104,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp))))
    | ( x3 = x1 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_61790]) ).

tff(c_62139,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp)))),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_62104]) ).

tff(c_1126,plain,
    ! [W_125,Z_122,Sigma_123,Y_124,X_121] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_121,Z_122),sep(lseg(Z_122,W_125),Sigma_123)))
      | ( Z_122 = W_125 )
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_121,Y_124),sep(lseg(Y_124,Z_122),sep(lseg(Z_122,W_125),Sigma_123)))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_1161,plain,
    ! [W_125,Z_122,Sigma_123,Y_124,X_121] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_121,Z_122),sep(lseg(Z_122,W_125),Sigma_123)))
      | ( Z_122 = W_125 )
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(Y_124,Z_122),sep(lseg(X_121,Y_124),sep(lseg(Z_122,W_125),Sigma_123)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_1126]) ).

tff(c_62154,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp)))
    | ( x3 = nil ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62139,c_1161]) ).

tff(c_62170,plain,
    x3 = nil,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_35,c_62154]) ).

tff(c_62174,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(nil,nil),emp))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62170,c_62170,c_35]) ).

tff(c_62179,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_62174]) ).

tff(c_460,plain,
    ! [X_93,Sigma_94,Y_95] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_93,nil),Sigma_94))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_93,Y_95),sep(lseg(Y_95,nil),Sigma_94))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_102]) ).

tff(c_464,plain,
    ! [X_93,T_2,Sigma_3,Y_95] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_93,nil),sep(T_2,Sigma_3)))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X_93,Y_95),sep(T_2,sep(lseg(Y_95,nil),Sigma_3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_460]) ).

tff(c_62171,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),sep(lseg(x2,x1),emp))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62139,c_464]) ).

tff(c_468,plain,
    ! [X_93,Sigma_3,Y_95] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X_93,nil),Sigma_3))
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(Y_95,nil),sep(lseg(X_93,Y_95),Sigma_3))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_460]) ).

tff(c_62188,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62171,c_468]) ).

tff(c_62194,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_62179,c_62188]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW410-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:27:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 44.69/33.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 44.69/33.36  
% 44.69/33.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 44.69/33.39  
% 44.69/33.39  Inference rules
% 44.69/33.39  ----------------------
% 44.69/33.39  #Ref     : 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Sup     : 16858
% 44.69/33.39  #Fact    : 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Define  : 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Split   : 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Chain   : 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Close   : 0
% 44.69/33.39  
% 44.69/33.39  Ordering : KBO
% 44.69/33.39  
% 44.69/33.39  Simplification rules
% 44.69/33.39  ----------------------
% 44.69/33.39  #Subsume      : 7131
% 44.69/33.39  #Demod        : 1005
% 44.69/33.39  #Tautology    : 623
% 44.69/33.39  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 44.69/33.39  #BackRed      : 5
% 44.69/33.39  
% 44.69/33.39  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 44.69/33.39  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 44.69/33.39  
% 44.69/33.39  Timing (in seconds)
% 44.69/33.39  ----------------------
% 44.69/33.40  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 44.69/33.40  Parsing              : 0.25
% 44.69/33.40  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 44.69/33.40  Main loop            : 31.86
% 44.69/33.40  Inferencing          : 2.36
% 44.69/33.40  Reduction            : 27.57
% 44.69/33.40  Demodulation         : 27.18
% 44.69/33.40  BG Simplification    : 0.25
% 44.69/33.40  Subsumption          : 1.39
% 44.69/33.40  Abstraction          : 0.34
% 44.69/33.40  MUC search           : 0.00
% 44.69/33.40  Cooper               : 0.00
% 44.69/33.40  Total                : 32.40
% 44.69/33.40  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 44.69/33.40  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 44.69/33.40  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 44.69/33.40  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------