TSTP Solution File: SWW409-1 by E-SAT---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem  : SWW409-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d SAT

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:14:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.18s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  16 unt;   5 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (  13 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unfolding_2,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',unfolding_2) ).

cnf(unfolding_3,axiom,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',unfolding_3) ).

cnf(normalization,axiom,
    sep(lseg(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',normalization) ).

cnf(associative_commutative,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',associative_commutative) ).

cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
    x1 != x3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',premise_3) ).

cnf(premise_5,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x1,x3),emp)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',premise_5) ).

cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p',conclusion_1) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unfolding_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unfolding_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    sep(lseg(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
    normalization ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
    associative_commutative ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(X3,X4))) = sep(X3,sep(X1,sep(X2,X4))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    x1 != x3,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[premise_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),sep(X2,X3)))
    | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X4),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X4,nil),X3)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X3,sep(X4,X5))))
    | ~ heap(sep(X3,sep(X4,sep(next(X1,X2),X5)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x3,nil),sep(next(x1,x3),emp)))),
    premise_5 ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    x1 != x3,
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),sep(X2,X3)))
    | ~ heap(sep(X2,sep(lseg(X1,X4),sep(lseg(X4,nil),X3)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x3,nil),emp)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conclusion_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),emp)),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWW409-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 07:56:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aL6VJzb3IM/E---3.1_17433.p
% 1.18/0.65  # Version: 3.2.0
% 1.18/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.18/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 17510 completed with status 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.18/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.18/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.18/0.65  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 1.18/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting sh5l with 226s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 17515 completed with status 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.18/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.18/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.18/0.65  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 1.18/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.18/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.18/0.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.18/0.65  
% 1.18/0.65  # Proof found!
% 1.18/0.65  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.18/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.18/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 1.18/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 1.18/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 1.18/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 1200
% 1.18/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 1.18/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 1068
% 1.18/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 128
% 1.18/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 1.18/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 10624
% 1.18/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10555
% 1.18/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 10624
% 1.18/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 188
% 1.18/0.65  # ...of those cached                   : 109
% 1.18/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.18/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 108
% 1.18/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 1.18/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 1.18/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 24
% 1.18/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 67
% 1.18/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9386
% 1.18/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 16873
% 1.18/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 1.18/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2277
% 1.18/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2277
% 1.18/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 424
% 1.18/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62
% 1.18/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1817
% 1.18/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 686
% 1.18/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.18/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 145279
% 1.18/0.65  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 35
% 1.18/0.65  
% 1.18/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.18/0.65  # User time                : 0.113 s
% 1.18/0.65  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 1.18/0.65  # Total time               : 0.122 s
% 1.18/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 1.18/0.65  
% 1.18/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.18/0.65  # User time                : 0.579 s
% 1.18/0.65  # System time              : 0.021 s
% 1.18/0.65  # Total time               : 0.599 s
% 1.18/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 1.18/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.18/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------