TSTP Solution File: SWW406-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW406-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:26:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s 300.21s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWW406-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 05:55:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37  Mon Jun  6 05:55:49 2022
% 0.14/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22488.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.14/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,26,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.21/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 21
% 0.21/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.21/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.21/0.39     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.21/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.21/0.39     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.83/3.01  
% 2.83/3.01  
% 2.83/3.01  Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 2.83/3.01  
% 2.83/3.01  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.83/3.01  
% 2.83/3.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.83/3.01  
% 2.83/3.01  Resetting weight limit to 57 after 35 givens.
% 2.83/3.01  
% 13.97/14.14  
% 13.97/14.14  
% 13.97/14.14  Changing weight limit from 57 to 49.
% 13.97/14.14  
% 13.97/14.14  Resetting weight limit to 49 after 65 givens.
% 13.97/14.14  
% 16.39/16.56  
% 16.39/16.56  
% 16.39/16.56  Changing weight limit from 49 to 42.
% 16.39/16.56  
% 16.39/16.56  Resetting weight limit to 42 after 70 givens.
% 16.39/16.56  
% 18.50/18.69  
% 18.50/18.69  
% 18.50/18.69  Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 18.50/18.69  
% 18.50/18.69  Resetting weight limit to 41 after 85 givens.
% 18.50/18.69  
% 18.98/19.20  
% 18.98/19.20  
% 18.98/19.20  Changing weight limit from 41 to 40.
% 18.98/19.20  
% 18.98/19.20  Resetting weight limit to 40 after 90 givens.
% 18.98/19.20  
% 20.92/21.13  
% 20.92/21.13  
% 20.92/21.13  Changing weight limit from 40 to 36.
% 20.92/21.13  
% 20.92/21.13  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 95 givens.
% 20.92/21.13  
% 21.29/21.50  
% 21.29/21.50  
% 21.29/21.50  Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 21.29/21.50  
% 21.29/21.50  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 100 givens.
% 21.29/21.50  
% 22.49/22.67  
% 22.49/22.67  
% 22.49/22.67  Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 22.49/22.67  
% 22.49/22.67  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 115 givens.
% 22.49/22.67  
% 23.39/23.59  
% 23.39/23.59  
% 23.39/23.59  Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 23.39/23.59  
% 23.39/23.59  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 130 givens.
% 23.39/23.59  
% 28.21/28.40  
% 28.21/28.40  
% 28.21/28.40  Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 28.21/28.40  
% 28.21/28.40  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 185 givens.
% 28.21/28.40  
% 35.46/35.65  
% 35.46/35.65  
% 35.46/35.65  Changing weight limit from 30 to 28.
% 35.46/35.65  
% 35.46/35.65  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 250 givens.
% 35.46/35.65  
% 39.00/39.22  
% 39.00/39.22  
% 39.00/39.22  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 39.00/39.22  
% 39.00/39.22  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 280 givens.
% 39.00/39.22  
% 39.35/39.52  
% 39.35/39.52  
% 39.35/39.52  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 39.35/39.52  
% 39.35/39.52  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 285 givens.
% 39.35/39.52  
% 46.38/46.58  
% 46.38/46.58  
% 46.38/46.58  Changing weight limit from 26 to 24.
% 46.38/46.58  
% 46.38/46.58  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 46.38/46.58  
% 46.38/46.58  
% 46.38/46.58  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 515 givens.
% 46.38/46.58  
% 300.04/300.21  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------