TSTP Solution File: SWW400-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWW400-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:11:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 13 unt; 4 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 10 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unfolding_2,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
| ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',unfolding_2) ).
cnf(normalization,axiom,
sep(lseg(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',normalization) ).
cnf(associative_commutative,axiom,
sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
heap(sep(next(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),emp))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',premise_3) ).
cnf(unfolding_3,axiom,
( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))
| ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',unfolding_3) ).
cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
nil != x2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',premise_2) ).
cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p',conclusion_1) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| heap(sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))
| ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,X3),X4))) ),
unfolding_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
sep(lseg(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
normalization ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = X2
| heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ heap(sep(next(X1,X2),X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
sep(X1,sep(X2,X3)) = sep(X2,sep(X1,X3)),
associative_commutative ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
heap(sep(next(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),emp))),
premise_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))
| ~ heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))) ),
unfolding_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X1 = X2
| heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X3,X4)))
| ~ heap(sep(X3,sep(next(X1,X2),X4))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(next(x2,nil),emp))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
nil != x2,
premise_2 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),X2))
| ~ heap(sep(lseg(X3,nil),sep(lseg(X1,X3),X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),emp))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
conclusion_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWW400-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:43:09 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E8UUklObfF/E---3.1_26577.p
% 0.16/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 26700 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.57 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26704 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.57 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 15
% 0.16/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Initial clauses : 15
% 0.16/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 0.16/0.57 # Processed clauses : 1261
% 0.16/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # ...subsumed : 1145
% 0.16/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 116
% 0.16/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.16/0.57 # Generated clauses : 10036
% 0.16/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9990
% 0.16/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Paramodulations : 10036
% 0.16/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 138
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 100
% 0.16/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.16/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.16/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 61
% 0.16/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8759
% 0.16/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 15650
% 0.16/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.16/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1822
% 0.16/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1822
% 0.16/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 347
% 0.16/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 53
% 0.16/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1705
% 0.16/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 694
% 0.16/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 133834
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 # User time : 0.139 s
% 0.16/0.57 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.57 # Total time : 0.144 s
% 0.16/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 # User time : 0.140 s
% 0.16/0.57 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.57 # Total time : 0.147 s
% 0.16/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.16/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------