TSTP Solution File: SWW399-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:26:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 44.38s 44.62s
% Output : Refutation 44.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 16:15:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sat Jun 4 16:15:26 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10264.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [copy,14,flip.1] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.13/0.38 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.13/0.38 distinct function count: 3
% 0.13/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.33/3.52
% 3.33/3.52
% 3.33/3.52 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 3.33/3.52
% 3.33/3.52 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.33/3.52
% 3.33/3.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.33/3.52
% 3.33/3.52 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 35 givens.
% 3.33/3.52
% 31.07/31.30
% 31.07/31.30
% 31.07/31.30 Changing weight limit from 57 to 52.
% 31.07/31.30
% 31.07/31.30 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 95 givens.
% 31.07/31.30
% 33.26/33.49
% 33.26/33.49
% 33.26/33.49 Changing weight limit from 52 to 44.
% 33.26/33.49
% 33.26/33.49 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 100 givens.
% 33.26/33.49
% 34.37/34.58
% 34.37/34.58
% 34.37/34.58 Changing weight limit from 44 to 42.
% 34.37/34.58
% 34.37/34.58 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 105 givens.
% 34.37/34.58
% 36.08/36.34
% 36.08/36.34
% 36.08/36.34 Changing weight limit from 42 to 40.
% 36.08/36.34
% 36.08/36.34 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 115 givens.
% 36.08/36.34
% 39.05/39.27
% 39.05/39.27
% 39.05/39.27 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 39.05/39.27
% 39.05/39.27 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 135 givens.
% 39.05/39.27
% 41.17/41.35
% 41.17/41.35
% 41.17/41.35 Changing weight limit from 39 to 38.
% 41.17/41.35
% 41.17/41.35 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 140 givens.
% 41.17/41.35
% 42.81/43.03
% 42.81/43.03
% 42.81/43.03 Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 42.81/43.03
% 42.81/43.03 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 145 givens.
% 42.81/43.03
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 44.21 sec ----> 27462 [binary,27461.1,12.1] {+} $F.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 5.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 44.38/44.62 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 44.38/44.62 % SZS output start Refutation
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 1 [] {+} -heap(sep(next(nil,A),B)).
% 44.38/44.62 2 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(nil,A),B))|A=nil.
% 44.38/44.62 6 [] {+} -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)).
% 44.38/44.62 12 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)).
% 44.38/44.62 14 [] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 44.38/44.62 16,15 [] {+} sep(lseg(A,A),B)=B.
% 44.38/44.62 17 [] {-} heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)).
% 44.38/44.62 66 [para_into,17.1.1.1.1,2.2.1,unit_del,1] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(nil,x1),A)).
% 44.38/44.62 364 [para_into,66.1.1,14.1.1] {+} -heap(sep(A,sep(lseg(nil,x1),B))).
% 44.38/44.62 921 [para_into,364.1.1.2.1.2,6.2.1] {+} -heap(sep(A,sep(lseg(nil,B),C)))| -heap(sep(next(x1,B),sep(lseg(B,D),E)))|heap(sep(lseg(x1,D),E)).
% 44.38/44.62 949 [factor,921.1.2,demod,16] {+} -heap(sep(next(x1,nil),A))|heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),A)).
% 44.38/44.62 27461 [hyper,949,17] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)).
% 44.38/44.62 27462 [binary,27461.1,12.1] {+} $F.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 % SZS output end Refutation
% 44.38/44.62 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 ============ end of search ============
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 true clauses given 56 (37.6%)
% 44.38/44.62 false clauses given 93
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 FALSE TRUE
% 44.38/44.62 12 0 32
% 44.38/44.62 13 0 20
% 44.38/44.62 14 0 67
% 44.38/44.62 15 0 21
% 44.38/44.62 16 0 194
% 44.38/44.62 17 0 33
% 44.38/44.62 18 0 243
% 44.38/44.62 19 16 37
% 44.38/44.62 20 168 416
% 44.38/44.62 21 23 43
% 44.38/44.62 22 182 419
% 44.38/44.62 23 89 78
% 44.38/44.62 24 234 747
% 44.38/44.62 25 47 114
% 44.38/44.62 26 183 349
% 44.38/44.62 27 103 26
% 44.38/44.62 28 241 276
% 44.38/44.62 29 41 17
% 44.38/44.62 30 386 221
% 44.38/44.62 31 81 58
% 44.38/44.62 32 344 169
% 44.38/44.62 33 41 26
% 44.38/44.62 34 255 74
% 44.38/44.62 35 63 56
% 44.38/44.62 36 147 105
% 44.38/44.62 37 45 42
% 44.38/44.62 tot: 2689 3883 (59.1% true)
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 44.38/44.62
% 44.38/44.62 Process 10264 finished Sat Jun 4 16:16:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------