TSTP Solution File: SWW399-1 by CSE_E---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.6
% Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jun 18 08:37:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.52s 2.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Jun 17 17:05:24 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.51 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 2.52/2.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.6
% 2.52/2.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/2.61 % Proof found
% 2.52/2.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/2.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.52/2.61 [26]~E(a4,a6)
% 2.52/2.61 [27]P1(f3(f5(a6,a4),a2))
% 2.52/2.61 [28]~P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),a2))
% 2.52/2.61 [16]E(f3(f1(x161,x161),x162),x162)
% 2.52/2.61 [17]~P1(f3(f5(a4,x171),x172))
% 2.52/2.61 [15]E(f3(x151,f3(x152,x153)),f3(x152,f3(x151,x153)))
% 2.52/2.61 [19]~P1(f3(f5(x191,x192),f3(f5(x191,x193),x194)))
% 2.52/2.61 [18]E(x181,a4)+~P1(f3(f1(a4,x181),x182))
% 2.52/2.61 [23]P1(f3(f1(x231,a4),x232))+~P1(f3(f1(x231,x233),f3(f1(x233,a4),x232)))
% 2.52/2.61 [20]E(x201,x202)+~P1(f3(f5(x201,x203),f3(f1(x201,x202),x204)))
% 2.52/2.61 [24]P1(f3(f1(x241,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244)))+~P1(f3(f1(x241,x245),f3(f1(x245,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244))))
% 2.52/2.61 [21]E(x211,x212)+E(x211,x213)+~P1(f3(f1(x211,x213),f3(f1(x211,x212),x214)))
% 2.52/2.61 [22]E(x221,x222)+P1(f3(f1(x221,x223),x224))+~P1(f3(f5(x221,x222),f3(f1(x222,x223),x224)))
% 2.52/2.61 [25]E(x251,x252)+P1(f3(f1(x253,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254)))+~P1(f3(f1(x253,x255),f3(f1(x255,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254))))
% 2.52/2.61 [29]E(x291,x291)
% 2.52/2.61 [30]E(x302,x301)+~E(x301,x302)
% 2.52/2.61 [31]E(x311,x313)+~E(x311,x312)+~E(x312,x313)
% 2.52/2.61 [32]~E(x321,x322)+E(f1(x321,x323),f1(x322,x323))
% 2.52/2.61 [33]~E(x331,x332)+E(f1(x333,x331),f1(x333,x332))
% 2.52/2.61 [34]~E(x341,x342)+E(f3(x341,x343),f3(x342,x343))
% 2.52/2.61 [35]~E(x351,x352)+E(f3(x353,x351),f3(x353,x352))
% 2.52/2.61 [36]~E(x361,x362)+E(f5(x361,x363),f5(x362,x363))
% 2.52/2.61 [37]~E(x371,x372)+E(f5(x373,x371),f5(x373,x372))
% 2.52/2.62 [38]~P1(x381)+P1(x382)+~E(x381,x382)
% 2.52/2.62 cnf(39,plain,
% 2.52/2.62 (E(x391,f3(f1(x392,x392),x391))),
% 2.52/2.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,30])).
% 2.52/2.62 cnf(45,plain,
% 2.52/2.62 (P1(f3(f1(x451,x451),f3(f5(a6,a4),a2)))),
% 2.52/2.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,27,38])).
% 2.52/2.62 cnf(59,plain,
% 2.52/2.62 ($false),
% 2.52/2.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[45,28,26,15,16,38,22,31,30]),
% 2.52/2.62 ['proof']).
% 2.52/2.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.52/2.62 % Total time : 2.080000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------