TSTP Solution File: SWW399-1 by CSE---1.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:09:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 05:18:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.55/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.56/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.56/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 % File : SWW399-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.56/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.56/0.62 % Problem : Verification Condition generated by Smallfoot
% 0.56/0.62 % Version : Especial.
% 0.56/0.62 % English : This is one of the verification conditions that were gathered
% 0.56/0.62 % from the output of Smallfoot when checking assertions on list
% 0.56/0.62 % manipulating programs from its own benchmark suite.
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 % Refs : [BCO06] Berdine et al. (2006), Smallfoot: Modular Automatic As
% 0.56/0.62 % : [RN11] Rybalchenko & Navarro Perez (2011), Separation Logic +
% 0.56/0.62 % : [Nav11] Navarro Perez (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.62 % Source : [Nav11]
% 0.56/0.62 % Names : smallfoot-vc25 [Nav11]
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.62 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.08 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0
% 0.56/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 12 RR)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of literals : 24 ( 9 equ; 11 neg)
% 0.56/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.56/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn)
% 0.56/0.62 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 % Comments :
% 0.56/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 %----Include axioms for Lists in Separation Logic
% 0.56/0.62 include('Axioms/SWV013-0.ax').
% 0.56/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 cnf(premise_1,hypothesis,
% 0.56/0.62 nil != x1 ).
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
% 0.56/0.62 heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)) ).
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.62 ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)) ).
% 0.56/0.62
% 0.56/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.56/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.62 %ClaNum:24(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.56/0.62 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:38)
% 0.56/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.56/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.56/0.62 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.56/0.62 %goalClause: 15
% 0.56/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.56/0.62 [14]~E(a4,a6)
% 0.56/0.62 [12]P1(f3(f5(a6,a4),a2))
% 0.56/0.62 [15]~P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),a2))
% 0.56/0.62 [11]E(f3(f1(x111,x111),x112),x112)
% 0.56/0.62 [16]~P1(f3(f5(a4,x161),x162))
% 0.56/0.62 [13]E(f3(x131,f3(x132,x133)),f3(x132,f3(x131,x133)))
% 0.56/0.62 [17]~P1(f3(f5(x171,x172),f3(f5(x171,x173),x174)))
% 0.56/0.62 [18]E(x181,a4)+~P1(f3(f1(a4,x181),x182))
% 0.56/0.62 [21]P1(f3(f1(x211,a4),x212))+~P1(f3(f1(x211,x213),f3(f1(x213,a4),x212)))
% 0.56/0.62 [19]E(x191,x192)+~P1(f3(f5(x191,x193),f3(f1(x191,x192),x194)))
% 0.56/0.62 [23]P1(f3(f1(x231,x232),f3(f5(x232,x233),x234)))+~P1(f3(f1(x231,x235),f3(f1(x235,x232),f3(f5(x232,x233),x234))))
% 0.56/0.62 [20]E(x201,x202)+E(x201,x203)+~P1(f3(f1(x201,x203),f3(f1(x201,x202),x204)))
% 0.56/0.62 [22]E(x221,x222)+P1(f3(f1(x221,x223),x224))+~P1(f3(f5(x221,x222),f3(f1(x222,x223),x224)))
% 0.56/0.62 [24]E(x241,x242)+P1(f3(f1(x243,x241),f3(f1(x241,x242),x244)))+~P1(f3(f1(x243,x245),f3(f1(x245,x241),f3(f1(x241,x242),x244))))
% 0.56/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.62 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.62 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.62 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.63 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.56/0.63 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.56/0.63 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.56/0.63 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.56/0.63 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.56/0.63 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.56/0.63 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (E(x251,f3(f1(x252,x252),x251))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (E(f3(f1(x271,x271),x272),x272)),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (~E(a4,f3(f1(x281,x281),a6))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,14,11,27,2,10,3])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (P1(f3(f1(x301,x301),f3(f5(a6,a4),a2)))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,12,10])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (~E(a4,f3(f1(x321,x321),f3(f1(x322,x322),a6)))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,28,12,11,10,3])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 ($false),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,30,32,13,14,11,10,3,22,2]),
% 0.56/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------