TSTP Solution File: SWW394+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.95s 2.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_asm,axiom,
! [X4,X7,X5] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5),tc_HOL_Obool)),X7),X4))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_asm) ).
fof(fact_subset__refl,axiom,
! [X10,X5] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X5,tc_HOL_Obool)),X10),X10)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_subset__refl) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X10),tc_HOL_Obool)),X9),X8))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X10,X8,X9) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_asm])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X11,X12] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X12,tc_HOL_Obool)),X11),X11)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_subset__refl]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)),X3),X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 12:47:03 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.95/2.14 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.95/2.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.95/2.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.161 s
% 0.95/2.14
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof found!
% 0.95/2.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/2.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.95/2.14 # Parsed axioms : 5224
% 0.95/2.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5123
% 0.95/2.14 # Initial clauses : 163
% 0.95/2.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.95/2.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 157
% 0.95/2.14 # Processed clauses : 158
% 0.95/2.14 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # ...subsumed : 37
% 0.95/2.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 119
% 0.95/2.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.95/2.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Generated clauses : 715
% 0.95/2.14 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 601
% 0.95/2.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.95/2.14 # Paramodulations : 694
% 0.95/2.14 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Equation resolutions : 22
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 103
% 0.95/2.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.95/2.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.95/2.14 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 598
% 0.95/2.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 1796
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1971
% 0.95/2.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1326
% 0.95/2.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 38
% 0.95/2.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.95/2.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 38
% 0.95/2.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.95/2.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 168258
% 0.95/2.14
% 0.95/2.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/2.14 # User time : 0.170 s
% 0.95/2.14 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.95/2.14 # Total time : 0.180 s
% 0.95/2.14 # Maximum resident set size: 13668 pages
% 0.95/24.13 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.95/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.95/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.21 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------