TSTP Solution File: SWW392+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWW392+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:23:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.54s
% Output : Proof 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_Q)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,sK1(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)),sK2(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_Q)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_conseq2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_hoare__derivs_OSkip)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_Q)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,sK1(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)),sK2(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_conseq2)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,sK1(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)),sK2(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,sK1(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a)),sK2(v_Q,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,v_G,t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW392+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 22:26:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.54 % symbols: 1213
% 0.18/0.54 % clauses: 8584
% 0.18/0.54 % start clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.54 % iterative deepening steps: 34
% 0.18/0.54 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.18/0.54 % literal attempts: 4403
% 0.18/0.54 % depth failures: 4176
% 0.18/0.54 % regularity failures: 5
% 0.18/0.54 % tautology failures: 73
% 0.18/0.54 % reductions: 97
% 0.18/0.54 % extensions: 4294
% 0.18/0.54 % SAT variables: 4991
% 0.18/0.54 % SAT clauses: 3713
% 0.18/0.54 % WalkSAT solutions: 3712
% 0.18/0.54 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------