TSTP Solution File: SWW387+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW387+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.93s 2.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  15   ~;  11   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   6   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_5,conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_5) ).

fof(fact_MGF,axiom,
    ! [X7] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
     => ( c_Com_OWT__bodies
       => ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X7))
         => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X7)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_MGF) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(fact_WT_Oequations_I7_J,axiom,
    ! [X6] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X6)))
    <=> ? [X13] : hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X6) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_WT_Oequations_I7_J) ).

fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
    hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_3) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
      | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X8))
      | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X8)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_MGF])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
    | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X14,X14,X16] :
      ( ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X14)))
        | hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X14) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),esk3_1(X14)) )
      & ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X14) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X16)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X14))) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_WT_Oequations_I7_J])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
    | hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
    | hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWW387+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 02:21:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.93/2.10  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.93/2.10  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.93/2.10  # Preprocessing time       : 0.234 s
% 0.93/2.10  
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof found!
% 0.93/2.10  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.93/2.10  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object clause steps            : 10
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object formula steps           : 10
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.93/2.10  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.93/2.10  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.93/2.10  # Parsed axioms                        : 5249
% 0.93/2.10  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5148
% 0.93/2.10  # Initial clauses                      : 132
% 0.93/2.10  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.93/2.10  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 129
% 0.93/2.10  # Processed clauses                    : 139
% 0.93/2.10  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.93/2.10  # ...subsumed                          : 21
% 0.93/2.10  # ...remaining for further processing  : 116
% 0.93/2.10  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.93/2.10  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.93/2.10  # Generated clauses                    : 1053
% 0.93/2.10  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1019
% 0.93/2.10  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Paramodulations                      : 1033
% 0.93/2.10  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Equation resolutions                 : 20
% 0.93/2.10  # Current number of processed clauses  : 110
% 0.93/2.10  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.93/2.10  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 0.93/2.10  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.93/2.10  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 79
% 0.93/2.10  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 956
% 0.93/2.10  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2498
% 0.93/2.10  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.93/2.10  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1906
% 0.93/2.10  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1299
% 0.93/2.10  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.93/2.10  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95
% 0.93/2.10  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 18
% 0.93/2.10  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 100
% 0.93/2.10  # BW rewrite match successes           : 25
% 0.93/2.10  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.93/2.10  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 189942
% 0.93/2.10  
% 0.93/2.10  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/2.10  # User time                : 0.268 s
% 0.93/2.10  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.93/2.10  # Total time               : 0.276 s
% 0.93/2.10  # Maximum resident set size: 14300 pages
% 0.93/24.10  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.93/24.10  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.93/24.11  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.93/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.13  Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------