TSTP Solution File: SWW385+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.13s 25.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 4 sgn 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_3,conjecture,
! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X3),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody)))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X3))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).
fof(fact_MGF,axiom,
! [X7] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
=> ( c_Com_OWT__bodies
=> ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X7))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X7)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_MGF) ).
fof(fact_domIff,axiom,
! [X94,X16,X6,X5] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X5),X6),c_Map_Odom(X5,X16,X94)))
<=> hAPP(X94,X6) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_domIff) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(fact_WT_OBody,axiom,
! [X37] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X37) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X37))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_WT_OBody) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X3),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody)))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X3))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X8] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X8))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X8)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_MGF])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X95,X96,X97,X98,X95,X96,X97,X98] :
( ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X98),X97),c_Map_Odom(X98,X96,X95)))
| hAPP(X95,X97) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X96) )
& ( hAPP(X95,X97) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X96)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X98),X97),c_Map_Odom(X98,X96,X95))) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_domIff])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),esk1_0),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody)))
& ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,esk1_0))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X4,X3,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),esk1_0),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X38] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X38) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X38))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_WT_OBody])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,esk1_0))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,esk1_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,esk1_0) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWW385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 11:58:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 1.13/24.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/24.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/24.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/24.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/25.33 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 1.13/25.33
% 1.13/25.33 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.13/25.33 # OLD status Res
% 1.13/25.33 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.13/25.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.179 s
% 1.13/25.33 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 1.13/25.33 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 1.13/25.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.171 s
% 1.13/25.33
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof found!
% 1.13/25.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.13/25.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object total steps : 23
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 1.13/25.33 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 1.13/25.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.13/25.33 # Parsed axioms : 5243
% 1.13/25.33 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5114
% 1.13/25.33 # Initial clauses : 208
% 1.13/25.33 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16
% 1.13/25.33 # Initial clauses in saturation : 192
% 1.13/25.33 # Processed clauses : 262
% 1.13/25.33 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 1.13/25.33 # ...subsumed : 66
% 1.13/25.33 # ...remaining for further processing : 189
% 1.13/25.33 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 1.13/25.33 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Generated clauses : 1123
% 1.13/25.33 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 888
% 1.13/25.33 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 1.13/25.33 # Paramodulations : 1100
% 1.13/25.33 # Factorizations : 2
% 1.13/25.33 # Equation resolutions : 22
% 1.13/25.33 # Current number of processed clauses : 184
% 1.13/25.33 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 1.13/25.33 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 1.13/25.33 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 1.13/25.33 # Non-unit-clauses : 132
% 1.13/25.33 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 818
% 1.13/25.33 # ...number of literals in the above : 2629
% 1.13/25.33 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5973
% 1.13/25.33 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3510
% 1.13/25.33 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 42
% 1.13/25.33 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 511
% 1.13/25.33 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # BW rewrite match attempts : 194
% 1.13/25.33 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 1.13/25.33 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.13/25.33 # Termbank termtop insertions : 190930
% 1.13/25.33
% 1.13/25.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/25.33 # User time : 0.190 s
% 1.13/25.33 # System time : 0.010 s
% 1.13/25.33 # Total time : 0.200 s
% 1.13/25.33 # Maximum resident set size: 15088 pages
% 1.13/47.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/47.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/47.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.13/47.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.13/47.24 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------