TSTP Solution File: SWW376+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.72s 156.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 9 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 26 sgn 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_impossible__Cons,axiom,
! [X41,X258,X257,X6] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X6)),X257)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X6)),X258)))
=> X257 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X6),X41),X258) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_impossible__Cons) ).
fof(fact_le__refl,axiom,
! [X136] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X136),X136)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_le__refl) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X67,X43,X19,X6,X5,X7] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X7,X5,X6),X19),X43),X67) = hAPP(hAPP(X19,X67),hAPP(X43,X67)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
! [X19,X6] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X6),X19) = X19,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_Collect__def) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X259,X260,X261,X262] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X262)),X261)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X262)),X260)))
| X261 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X262),X259),X260) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_impossible__Cons])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X137] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X137),X137)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_le__refl]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X4)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X2)),X1)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X2)),X4))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X1),X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X68,X69,X70,X71,X72,X73] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X73,X72,X71),X70),X69),X68) = hAPP(hAPP(X70,X68),hAPP(X69,X68)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1),X2),X3) != X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X20,X21] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X21),X20) = X20,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_Set_OCollect(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWW376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 11:50:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.07/24.13 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/24.13 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/24.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/47.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/47.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/47.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/47.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/70.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/70.17 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/70.17
% 1.29/70.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.40/93.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.40/93.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.40/93.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.40/93.22 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.52/116.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.52/116.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.52/116.22 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.52/116.24 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/139.23 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/139.23 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/139.24 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/139.26 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 1.006 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.253 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.945 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 1.156 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 1.041 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.72/156.88 # OLD status Res
% 1.72/156.88 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.182 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 1.72/156.88 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.72/156.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.303 s
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof found!
% 1.72/156.88 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.72/156.88 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 1.72/156.88 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.72/156.88 # Parsed axioms : 5243
% 1.72/156.88 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4092
% 1.72/156.88 # Initial clauses : 1692
% 1.72/156.88 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 67
% 1.72/156.88 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1625
% 1.72/156.88 # Processed clauses : 6573
% 1.72/156.88 # ...of these trivial : 172
% 1.72/156.88 # ...subsumed : 4514
% 1.72/156.88 # ...remaining for further processing : 1887
% 1.72/156.88 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1225
% 1.72/156.88 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 275230
% 1.72/156.88 # Backward-subsumed : 56
% 1.72/156.88 # Backward-rewritten : 386
% 1.72/156.88 # Generated clauses : 724143
% 1.72/156.88 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 712844
% 1.72/156.88 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 117
% 1.72/156.88 # Paramodulations : 722718
% 1.72/156.88 # Factorizations : 112
% 1.72/156.88 # Equation resolutions : 1315
% 1.72/156.88 # Current number of processed clauses : 1407
% 1.72/156.88 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 353
% 1.72/156.88 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 40
% 1.72/156.88 # Negative unit clauses : 131
% 1.72/156.88 # Non-unit-clauses : 883
% 1.72/156.88 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 99566
% 1.72/156.88 # ...number of literals in the above : 268462
% 1.72/156.88 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Current number of archived clauses : 442
% 1.72/156.88 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 257144
% 1.72/156.88 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 188693
% 1.72/156.88 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4049
% 1.72/156.88 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17469
% 1.72/156.88 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 283
% 1.72/156.88 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5061
% 1.72/156.88 # BW rewrite match successes : 446
% 1.72/156.88 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.72/156.88 # Termbank termtop insertions : 20737998
% 1.72/156.88
% 1.72/156.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.72/156.88 # User time : 16.788 s
% 1.72/156.88 # System time : 0.142 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Total time : 16.930 s
% 1.72/156.88 # Maximum resident set size: 162676 pages
% 1.72/162.25 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/162.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.72/162.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.72/162.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.27 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/162.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.72/162.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.72/162.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.28 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/162.29 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.72/162.29 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.29 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.29 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/162.31 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------